结合一个健康概念的基于问题的学习现场模拟方法的有效性

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of veterinary medical education Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-07 DOI:10.3138/jvme-2022-0132
Farina Mustaffa-Kamal, Intan Nur Fatiha Shafie, Siti Zulaikha Zakariah, Wan Nor Syaheera Wan Mohd Sanusi, Zoharah Omar, Aizad Azahar, Syafinaz Amin Nordin, Sharina Omar, Nur Indah Ahmad, Rozanah Asmah Abd Samad, Mohd Shafarin Shamsuddin, Siti Suri Arshad
{"title":"结合一个健康概念的基于问题的学习现场模拟方法的有效性","authors":"Farina Mustaffa-Kamal, Intan Nur Fatiha Shafie, Siti Zulaikha Zakariah, Wan Nor Syaheera Wan Mohd Sanusi, Zoharah Omar, Aizad Azahar, Syafinaz Amin Nordin, Sharina Omar, Nur Indah Ahmad, Rozanah Asmah Abd Samad, Mohd Shafarin Shamsuddin, Siti Suri Arshad","doi":"10.3138/jvme-2022-0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One Health problem-based learning (PBL) is known as an effective method in teaching zoonotic diseases. However, the classic classroom setting limits real-life exposure for students. Simulation-based learning may improve the learning experience without exposing the students to unnecessary risks. Hence, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of field simulation PBL compared to a classic classroom setting using a module developed based on the One Health concept by examining the students' reactions to the learning and by assessing the students' performance. A quasi-experimental design was adopted in this study. Veterinary and medical undergraduate students participated in both types of PBL settings, and their knowledge and satisfaction were evaluated through a pre- and post-test as well as a feedback survey. The mean satisfaction score of students undergoing field simulation was significantly higher than the mean satisfaction score of students undergoing classic PBL (<i>p</i> > .05). The respondents from both programs found the field simulation, in comparison to classic PBL, was more effective, and they were more satisfied with the overall learning experience, workloads, and facilitation. The attainment of the cognitive domain was comparable between both PBL groups, which was possibly due to the type of assessment used. In conclusion, field simulation enhanced the students' positive learning experiences as they exhibited better attitudes toward learning. Future studies on the impact of the simulation on long-term knowledge retention and psychomotor skills are thus warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":17575,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary medical education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Field Simulation Approach for Problem-Based Learning That Incorporates the One Health Concept.\",\"authors\":\"Farina Mustaffa-Kamal, Intan Nur Fatiha Shafie, Siti Zulaikha Zakariah, Wan Nor Syaheera Wan Mohd Sanusi, Zoharah Omar, Aizad Azahar, Syafinaz Amin Nordin, Sharina Omar, Nur Indah Ahmad, Rozanah Asmah Abd Samad, Mohd Shafarin Shamsuddin, Siti Suri Arshad\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/jvme-2022-0132\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>One Health problem-based learning (PBL) is known as an effective method in teaching zoonotic diseases. However, the classic classroom setting limits real-life exposure for students. Simulation-based learning may improve the learning experience without exposing the students to unnecessary risks. Hence, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of field simulation PBL compared to a classic classroom setting using a module developed based on the One Health concept by examining the students' reactions to the learning and by assessing the students' performance. A quasi-experimental design was adopted in this study. Veterinary and medical undergraduate students participated in both types of PBL settings, and their knowledge and satisfaction were evaluated through a pre- and post-test as well as a feedback survey. The mean satisfaction score of students undergoing field simulation was significantly higher than the mean satisfaction score of students undergoing classic PBL (<i>p</i> > .05). The respondents from both programs found the field simulation, in comparison to classic PBL, was more effective, and they were more satisfied with the overall learning experience, workloads, and facilitation. The attainment of the cognitive domain was comparable between both PBL groups, which was possibly due to the type of assessment used. In conclusion, field simulation enhanced the students' positive learning experiences as they exhibited better attitudes toward learning. Future studies on the impact of the simulation on long-term knowledge retention and psychomotor skills are thus warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17575,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of veterinary medical education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2022-0132\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary medical education","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2022-0132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个健康基于问题的学习(PBL)被认为是人畜共患疾病教学的有效方法。然而,传统的课堂设置限制了学生在现实生活中的接触。基于模拟的学习可以改善学习体验,而不会使学生面临不必要的风险。因此,本研究旨在通过检查学生对学习的反应和评估学生的表现,来评估现场模拟PBL与经典课堂设置相比的有效性,该模块是基于“同一个健康”概念开发的。本研究采用准实验设计。兽医和医学本科学生分别参与了两种PBL环境,并通过前后测试和反馈调查对其知识和满意度进行了评价。实地模拟学生的平均满意度得分显著高于经典PBL学生的平均满意度得分(p < 0.05)。来自两个项目的受访者都发现,与经典的PBL相比,现场模拟更有效,他们对整体学习体验、工作量和促进更满意。两个PBL组之间的认知领域的成就具有可比性,这可能是由于所使用的评估类型。综上所述,实地模拟增强了学生的积极学习体验,表现出更好的学习态度。因此,未来关于模拟对长期知识保留和精神运动技能影响的研究是有必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Field Simulation Approach for Problem-Based Learning That Incorporates the One Health Concept.

One Health problem-based learning (PBL) is known as an effective method in teaching zoonotic diseases. However, the classic classroom setting limits real-life exposure for students. Simulation-based learning may improve the learning experience without exposing the students to unnecessary risks. Hence, this study aimed to assess the effectiveness of field simulation PBL compared to a classic classroom setting using a module developed based on the One Health concept by examining the students' reactions to the learning and by assessing the students' performance. A quasi-experimental design was adopted in this study. Veterinary and medical undergraduate students participated in both types of PBL settings, and their knowledge and satisfaction were evaluated through a pre- and post-test as well as a feedback survey. The mean satisfaction score of students undergoing field simulation was significantly higher than the mean satisfaction score of students undergoing classic PBL (p > .05). The respondents from both programs found the field simulation, in comparison to classic PBL, was more effective, and they were more satisfied with the overall learning experience, workloads, and facilitation. The attainment of the cognitive domain was comparable between both PBL groups, which was possibly due to the type of assessment used. In conclusion, field simulation enhanced the students' positive learning experiences as they exhibited better attitudes toward learning. Future studies on the impact of the simulation on long-term knowledge retention and psychomotor skills are thus warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
30.00%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (JVME) is the peer-reviewed scholarly journal of the Association of American Veterinary Medical Colleges (AAVMC). As an internationally distributed journal, JVME provides a forum for the exchange of ideas, research, and discoveries about veterinary medical education. This exchange benefits veterinary faculty, students, and the veterinary profession as a whole by preparing veterinarians to better perform their professional activities and to meet the needs of society. The journal’s areas of focus include best practices and educational methods in veterinary education; recruitment, training, and mentoring of students at all levels of education, including undergraduate, graduate, veterinary technology, and continuing education; clinical instruction and assessment; institutional policy; and other challenges and issues faced by veterinary educators domestically and internationally. Veterinary faculty of all countries are encouraged to participate as contributors, reviewers, and institutional representatives.
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Analysis of Intern Applications and its Relationship to Performance. Case-Based Learning: An Analysis of Student Groupwork and Instructional Design that Promotes Collaborative Discussion. The Effect of Repeated Review of Course Content on Medium- and Long-Term Retention in an Elective Veterinary Cardiology Course. Companion Animal Cadaver Donation for Teaching Purposes at Veterinary Medicine Colleges: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Changing Perceptions of Veterinary Undergraduates to Module Re-Structuring as They Progress Through the Curriculum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1