推动温室气体排放强度的是收入和投资,而不是能源政策

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Economic Systems Research Pub Date : 2022-11-26 DOI:10.1080/09535314.2022.2133598
Joel F. Bruneau, M. Ghosh, D. Luo, Yunfa Zhu
{"title":"推动温室气体排放强度的是收入和投资,而不是能源政策","authors":"Joel F. Bruneau, M. Ghosh, D. Luo, Yunfa Zhu","doi":"10.1080/09535314.2022.2133598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions continue to rise but, at the same time, emission intensities associated with domestic consumption and territorial production have declined albeit at vastly different rates across economies. To identify the socioeconomic factors that drive this cross-country variation, we combine input–output modelling with panel data analysis. Using the World Input–Output Database, we estimate GHG intensities separately for domestic consumption and for territorial production. For the regression analysis, we consider several socioeconomic factors that capture development features, exposure to international trade, as well as energy prices and GHG-relevant programmes. Our results show that development-type factors, such as per capita income, capital-labour ratios, and investments, are the primary drivers of cross-country differences. Energy prices and domestic GHG policies are not major drivers. We also find that reductions in intensities are primarily through changes in techniques rather than compositional changes in the structure of economies.","PeriodicalId":47760,"journal":{"name":"Economic Systems Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"438 - 457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Income and investment, not energy policy, are driving GHG emission intensities\",\"authors\":\"Joel F. Bruneau, M. Ghosh, D. Luo, Yunfa Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09535314.2022.2133598\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions continue to rise but, at the same time, emission intensities associated with domestic consumption and territorial production have declined albeit at vastly different rates across economies. To identify the socioeconomic factors that drive this cross-country variation, we combine input–output modelling with panel data analysis. Using the World Input–Output Database, we estimate GHG intensities separately for domestic consumption and for territorial production. For the regression analysis, we consider several socioeconomic factors that capture development features, exposure to international trade, as well as energy prices and GHG-relevant programmes. Our results show that development-type factors, such as per capita income, capital-labour ratios, and investments, are the primary drivers of cross-country differences. Energy prices and domestic GHG policies are not major drivers. We also find that reductions in intensities are primarily through changes in techniques rather than compositional changes in the structure of economies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Systems Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"438 - 457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Systems Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2022.2133598\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Systems Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09535314.2022.2133598","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球温室气体(GHG)排放量继续上升,但与此同时,与国内消费和领土生产相关的排放强度下降了,尽管不同经济体的下降速度差异很大。为了确定驱动这种跨国差异的社会经济因素,我们将投入产出模型与面板数据分析相结合。利用世界投入产出数据库,我们分别估算了国内消费和领土生产的温室气体强度。对于回归分析,我们考虑了几个社会经济因素,这些因素反映了发展特征、国际贸易、能源价格和温室气体相关计划。我们的研究结果表明,发展类型的因素,如人均收入、资本劳动比率和投资,是国家间差异的主要驱动因素。能源价格和国内温室气体政策不是主要驱动因素。我们还发现,强度的降低主要是通过技术的变化,而不是经济结构的组成变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Income and investment, not energy policy, are driving GHG emission intensities
Global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions continue to rise but, at the same time, emission intensities associated with domestic consumption and territorial production have declined albeit at vastly different rates across economies. To identify the socioeconomic factors that drive this cross-country variation, we combine input–output modelling with panel data analysis. Using the World Input–Output Database, we estimate GHG intensities separately for domestic consumption and for territorial production. For the regression analysis, we consider several socioeconomic factors that capture development features, exposure to international trade, as well as energy prices and GHG-relevant programmes. Our results show that development-type factors, such as per capita income, capital-labour ratios, and investments, are the primary drivers of cross-country differences. Energy prices and domestic GHG policies are not major drivers. We also find that reductions in intensities are primarily through changes in techniques rather than compositional changes in the structure of economies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Economic Systems Research is a double blind peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to the furtherance of theoretical and factual knowledge about economic systems, structures and processes, and their change through time and space, at the subnational, national and international level. The journal contains sensible, matter-of-fact tools and data for modelling, policy analysis, planning and decision making in large economic environments. It promotes understanding in economic thinking and between theoretical schools of East and West, North and South.
期刊最新文献
Coupling an integrated assessment model with an input–output database Storm in the Cloud: A Study on the Macroeconomic Impact of the UK’s Digital Service Tax Structural change and socio-economic disparities in a net zero transition Risk-based dynamic inoperability input-output and non-linear optimisation models to analyse resilience in the construction industry Forced labour in the fashion industry: a hypothetical EU-driven reorganisation of textile value chains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1