斯莫尔特:调查潜力和劣势

Nirwana Wijayanti, Eka N. KENCANA, I. W. Sumarjaya
{"title":"斯莫尔特:调查潜力和劣势","authors":"Nirwana Wijayanti, Eka N. KENCANA, I. W. Sumarjaya","doi":"10.24843/mtk.2021.v10.i04.p348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Imbalanced data is a problem that is often found in real-world cases of classification. Imbalanced data causes misclassification will tend to occur in the minority class. This can lead to errors in decision-making if the minority class has important information and it’s the focus of attention in research. Generally, there are two approaches that can be taken to deal with the problem of imbalanced data, the data level approach and the algorithm level approach. The data level approach has proven to be very effective in dealing with imbalanced data and more flexible. The oversampling method is one of the data level approaches that generally gives better results than the undersampling method. SMOTE is the most popular oversampling method used in more applications. In this study, we will discuss in more detail the SMOTE method, potential, and disadvantages of this method. In general, this method is intended to avoid overfitting and improve classification performance in the minority class. However, this method also causes overgeneralization which tends to be overlapping.","PeriodicalId":11600,"journal":{"name":"E-Jurnal Matematika","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SMOTE: POTENSI DAN KEKURANGANNYA PADA SURVEI\",\"authors\":\"Nirwana Wijayanti, Eka N. KENCANA, I. W. Sumarjaya\",\"doi\":\"10.24843/mtk.2021.v10.i04.p348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Imbalanced data is a problem that is often found in real-world cases of classification. Imbalanced data causes misclassification will tend to occur in the minority class. This can lead to errors in decision-making if the minority class has important information and it’s the focus of attention in research. Generally, there are two approaches that can be taken to deal with the problem of imbalanced data, the data level approach and the algorithm level approach. The data level approach has proven to be very effective in dealing with imbalanced data and more flexible. The oversampling method is one of the data level approaches that generally gives better results than the undersampling method. SMOTE is the most popular oversampling method used in more applications. In this study, we will discuss in more detail the SMOTE method, potential, and disadvantages of this method. In general, this method is intended to avoid overfitting and improve classification performance in the minority class. However, this method also causes overgeneralization which tends to be overlapping.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"E-Jurnal Matematika\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"E-Jurnal Matematika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24843/mtk.2021.v10.i04.p348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Jurnal Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/mtk.2021.v10.i04.p348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

数据不平衡是一个经常出现在现实世界分类案例中的问题。数据不平衡导致的错误分类往往会发生在少数群体中。如果少数群体掌握了重要信息,这可能会导致决策失误,而这正是研究的重点。一般来说,有两种方法可以用来处理数据不平衡的问题,数据级方法和算法级方法。事实证明,数据级方法在处理不平衡数据方面非常有效,而且更加灵活。过采样方法是数据级方法之一,通常比欠采样方法给出更好的结果。SMOTE是在更多应用中使用的最流行的过采样方法。在本研究中,我们将更详细地讨论SMOTE方法、该方法的潜力和缺点。通常,这种方法旨在避免过拟合,并提高少数类的分类性能。然而,这种方法也会导致过度概括,这往往是重叠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SMOTE: POTENSI DAN KEKURANGANNYA PADA SURVEI
Imbalanced data is a problem that is often found in real-world cases of classification. Imbalanced data causes misclassification will tend to occur in the minority class. This can lead to errors in decision-making if the minority class has important information and it’s the focus of attention in research. Generally, there are two approaches that can be taken to deal with the problem of imbalanced data, the data level approach and the algorithm level approach. The data level approach has proven to be very effective in dealing with imbalanced data and more flexible. The oversampling method is one of the data level approaches that generally gives better results than the undersampling method. SMOTE is the most popular oversampling method used in more applications. In this study, we will discuss in more detail the SMOTE method, potential, and disadvantages of this method. In general, this method is intended to avoid overfitting and improve classification performance in the minority class. However, this method also causes overgeneralization which tends to be overlapping.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Potential Impact of Agouti Related Peptide and Asprosin on Metabolic Parameters and Eating Behavior in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. PENGELOMPOKKAN KABUPATEN DI PROVINSI JAWA TENGAH BERDASARKAN KARAKTERISTIK IKLIM MENGGUNAKAN FUZZY CLUSTERING Perhitungan Premi Asuransi Menggunakan Model Select Table Pada Asuransi Joint Life PENERAPAN MODEL INVENTORI PROBABILISTIK FUZZY MULTIOBJEKTIF PADA SISTEM PERSEDIAAN BUAH SALAK KAUSALITAS ANTARA ANXIETY, SOCIAL PHOBIA TERHADAP PEMAIN VIDEO GAME
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1