{"title":"登记“性别意识形态”","authors":"Rodrigo Borba","doi":"10.1075/jls.21003.bor","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Mobilizations against gender equality and sexual diversity have gained political traction globally despite their\n hyperbolic modes of action and conspiracist rhetoric. These anti-gender campaigns rally around “gender ideology,” a trope used to\n anathemize feminist and LGBTQIA+ activism/scholarship. This paper argues that anti-genderism is a register – a conventionalized\n aggregate of expressive forms and enactable person-types – of which “gender ideology” is the most famous shibboleth. The paper\n shows how inchoate collections of words, modes of action, and images of people (i.e. signs) have been enregistered into the\n cohesive but heterogeneous whole of anti-genderism through semiotic processes of clasping, relaying, and grafting (Gal 2018; 2019). The paper offers a\n sociolinguistic analysis of anti-genderism to understand the challenges it poses to the enfranchisement of women, queer, trans,\n and nonbinary people.","PeriodicalId":36680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enregistering “gender ideology”\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Borba\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jls.21003.bor\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Mobilizations against gender equality and sexual diversity have gained political traction globally despite their\\n hyperbolic modes of action and conspiracist rhetoric. These anti-gender campaigns rally around “gender ideology,” a trope used to\\n anathemize feminist and LGBTQIA+ activism/scholarship. This paper argues that anti-genderism is a register – a conventionalized\\n aggregate of expressive forms and enactable person-types – of which “gender ideology” is the most famous shibboleth. The paper\\n shows how inchoate collections of words, modes of action, and images of people (i.e. signs) have been enregistered into the\\n cohesive but heterogeneous whole of anti-genderism through semiotic processes of clasping, relaying, and grafting (Gal 2018; 2019). The paper offers a\\n sociolinguistic analysis of anti-genderism to understand the challenges it poses to the enfranchisement of women, queer, trans,\\n and nonbinary people.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.21003.bor\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.21003.bor","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mobilizations against gender equality and sexual diversity have gained political traction globally despite their
hyperbolic modes of action and conspiracist rhetoric. These anti-gender campaigns rally around “gender ideology,” a trope used to
anathemize feminist and LGBTQIA+ activism/scholarship. This paper argues that anti-genderism is a register – a conventionalized
aggregate of expressive forms and enactable person-types – of which “gender ideology” is the most famous shibboleth. The paper
shows how inchoate collections of words, modes of action, and images of people (i.e. signs) have been enregistered into the
cohesive but heterogeneous whole of anti-genderism through semiotic processes of clasping, relaying, and grafting (Gal 2018; 2019). The paper offers a
sociolinguistic analysis of anti-genderism to understand the challenges it poses to the enfranchisement of women, queer, trans,
and nonbinary people.