用加权最小二乘方法组合了三个全局莫霍密度对比模型

IF 1.2 Q4 REMOTE SENSING Journal of Applied Geodesy Pub Date : 2022-05-06 DOI:10.1515/jag-2022-0004
L. Sjöberg, M. Abrehdary
{"title":"用加权最小二乘方法组合了三个全局莫霍密度对比模型","authors":"L. Sjöberg, M. Abrehdary","doi":"10.1515/jag-2022-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Due to different structures of the Earth’s crust and mantle, there is a significant density contrast at their boundary, the Moho Density Contrast (or shortly MDC). Frequently one assumes that the MDC is about 600 kg/m3, but seismic and gravimetric data show a considerable variation from region to region, and today there are few such studies, and global models are utterly rare. This research determines a new global model, called MDC21, which is a weighted least-squares combination of three available MDC models, pixel by pixel at a resolution of 1° × 1°. For proper weighting among the models, the study starts by estimating lacking standard errors and (frequently high) correlations among them. The numerical investigation shows that MDC21 varies from 21 to 504 kg/m3 in ocean areas and ranges from 132 to 629 kg/m3 in continental regions. The global average is 335 kg/m3. The standard errors estimated in ocean regions are mostly less than 40 kg/m3, while for continental regions it grows to 80 kg/m3. Most standard errors are small, but they reach to notable values in some specific regions. The estimated MDCs (as well as Moho depths) at mid-ocean ridges are small but show significant variations and qualities.","PeriodicalId":45494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","volume":"16 1","pages":"331 - 339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combination of three global Moho density contrast models by a weighted least-squares procedure\",\"authors\":\"L. Sjöberg, M. Abrehdary\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jag-2022-0004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Due to different structures of the Earth’s crust and mantle, there is a significant density contrast at their boundary, the Moho Density Contrast (or shortly MDC). Frequently one assumes that the MDC is about 600 kg/m3, but seismic and gravimetric data show a considerable variation from region to region, and today there are few such studies, and global models are utterly rare. This research determines a new global model, called MDC21, which is a weighted least-squares combination of three available MDC models, pixel by pixel at a resolution of 1° × 1°. For proper weighting among the models, the study starts by estimating lacking standard errors and (frequently high) correlations among them. The numerical investigation shows that MDC21 varies from 21 to 504 kg/m3 in ocean areas and ranges from 132 to 629 kg/m3 in continental regions. The global average is 335 kg/m3. The standard errors estimated in ocean regions are mostly less than 40 kg/m3, while for continental regions it grows to 80 kg/m3. Most standard errors are small, but they reach to notable values in some specific regions. The estimated MDCs (as well as Moho depths) at mid-ocean ridges are small but show significant variations and qualities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Geodesy\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"331 - 339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Geodesy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2022-0004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2022-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于地壳和地幔的结构不同,在它们的边界处存在明显的密度反差,即莫霍密度反差(Moho density contrast,简称MDC)。人们经常假设MDC约为600 kg/m3,但地震和重力数据显示区域之间有相当大的差异,今天很少有这样的研究,全球模型也非常罕见。本研究确定了一种新的全局模型MDC21,它是三个可用MDC模型的加权最小二乘组合,分辨率为1°× 1°。为了在模型之间进行适当的加权,研究从估计缺乏标准误差和(通常是高)相关性开始。数值研究表明,海洋区域MDC21变化范围为21 ~ 504 kg/m3,大陆区域MDC21变化范围为132 ~ 629 kg/m3。全球平均值为335公斤/立方米。海洋区域估计的标准误差大多小于40 kg/m3,而大陆区域则增加到80 kg/m3。大多数标准误差很小,但在某些特定区域会达到显著值。在大洋中脊估计的MDCs(以及莫霍深度)很小,但显示出显著的变化和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Combination of three global Moho density contrast models by a weighted least-squares procedure
Abstract Due to different structures of the Earth’s crust and mantle, there is a significant density contrast at their boundary, the Moho Density Contrast (or shortly MDC). Frequently one assumes that the MDC is about 600 kg/m3, but seismic and gravimetric data show a considerable variation from region to region, and today there are few such studies, and global models are utterly rare. This research determines a new global model, called MDC21, which is a weighted least-squares combination of three available MDC models, pixel by pixel at a resolution of 1° × 1°. For proper weighting among the models, the study starts by estimating lacking standard errors and (frequently high) correlations among them. The numerical investigation shows that MDC21 varies from 21 to 504 kg/m3 in ocean areas and ranges from 132 to 629 kg/m3 in continental regions. The global average is 335 kg/m3. The standard errors estimated in ocean regions are mostly less than 40 kg/m3, while for continental regions it grows to 80 kg/m3. Most standard errors are small, but they reach to notable values in some specific regions. The estimated MDCs (as well as Moho depths) at mid-ocean ridges are small but show significant variations and qualities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geodesy
Journal of Applied Geodesy REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal postseismic due to the 2018 Lombok earthquake based on insar revealed multi mechanisms with long duration afterslip Differential synthetic aperture radar (SAR) interferometry for detection land subsidence in Derna City, Libya Improving the approximation quality of tensor product B-spline surfaces by local parameterization Advanced topographic-geodetic surveys and GNSS methodologies in urban planning Detection of GNSS ionospheric scintillations in multiple directions over a low latitude station
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1