2%盐酸利多卡因和肾上腺素(1:200000)对控制性高血压和非高血压患者牙科麻醉期间血压影响的比较研究

L. Tuladhar, Meen Bahadur Budhathoki, A. Bhattarai, K. Bimb, N. Acharya, E. Tuladhar
{"title":"2%盐酸利多卡因和肾上腺素(1:200000)对控制性高血压和非高血压患者牙科麻醉期间血压影响的比较研究","authors":"L. Tuladhar, Meen Bahadur Budhathoki, A. Bhattarai, K. Bimb, N. Acharya, E. Tuladhar","doi":"10.22502/JLMC.V9I1.415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Local anesthetic used for dental extraction is 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:200000). Lidocaine is cardiac depressant and adrenaline is cardiac stimulant; it decreases or increases blood pressure respectively. Methods: A total of 100 patients (50 controlled hypertensive and 50 non-hypertensive) were selected. The study was conducted over a period of 14 months from January 2020 to February 2021. Blood pressure was measured for patients who were planned for dental extraction by auscultatory method. Following that, 1.5-3 ml (depending upon the nerve block) 2% lidocaine with adrenaline (1:200000) was injected using a 3ml syringe (26 Gauge). Blood pressure was re-recorded after 10 minutes from the time of injection. Visual analog scale pain score was obtained during administration of local anesthesia. Paired t-test was applied to compare blood pressure change before and after administration of local anesthesia in controlled hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients. Results: There was a statistically significant increase in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in non-hypertensive patients (p = 0.008, p = 0.017). This, however, was not the case with controlled hypertensive patients. There was statistically significant increase in systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001). Pain on injection (50% in non-hypertensive and 48% in controlled hypertensive patients) was the only adverse drug reaction that was reported in both groups. Conclusion: 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:200000) increased systolic but not diastolic blood pressure in controlled hypertensive patients","PeriodicalId":16109,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Lumbini Medical College","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study on Effects of 2% Lidocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:200000) on Blood Pressure Among Controlled Hypertensive and Non-hypertensive Patients During Dental Anesthesia\",\"authors\":\"L. Tuladhar, Meen Bahadur Budhathoki, A. Bhattarai, K. Bimb, N. Acharya, E. Tuladhar\",\"doi\":\"10.22502/JLMC.V9I1.415\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Local anesthetic used for dental extraction is 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:200000). Lidocaine is cardiac depressant and adrenaline is cardiac stimulant; it decreases or increases blood pressure respectively. Methods: A total of 100 patients (50 controlled hypertensive and 50 non-hypertensive) were selected. The study was conducted over a period of 14 months from January 2020 to February 2021. Blood pressure was measured for patients who were planned for dental extraction by auscultatory method. Following that, 1.5-3 ml (depending upon the nerve block) 2% lidocaine with adrenaline (1:200000) was injected using a 3ml syringe (26 Gauge). Blood pressure was re-recorded after 10 minutes from the time of injection. Visual analog scale pain score was obtained during administration of local anesthesia. Paired t-test was applied to compare blood pressure change before and after administration of local anesthesia in controlled hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients. Results: There was a statistically significant increase in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in non-hypertensive patients (p = 0.008, p = 0.017). This, however, was not the case with controlled hypertensive patients. There was statistically significant increase in systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001). Pain on injection (50% in non-hypertensive and 48% in controlled hypertensive patients) was the only adverse drug reaction that was reported in both groups. Conclusion: 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:200000) increased systolic but not diastolic blood pressure in controlled hypertensive patients\",\"PeriodicalId\":16109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Lumbini Medical College\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Lumbini Medical College\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22502/JLMC.V9I1.415\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Lumbini Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22502/JLMC.V9I1.415","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:用于拔牙的局部麻醉剂是2%盐酸利多卡因和肾上腺素(1:200000)。利多卡因是心脏抑制剂,肾上腺素是心脏兴奋剂;它分别降低或升高血压。方法:选择100例患者,其中50例为高血压对照组,50例为非高血压对照组。这项研究从2020年1月到2021年2月,历时14个月。通过听诊法测量计划拔牙的患者的血压。随后,使用3ml注射器(26号)注射1.5-3ml(取决于神经阻滞)2%利多卡因和肾上腺素(1:200000)。在注射后10分钟后重新记录血压。在局部麻醉期间获得视觉模拟量表疼痛评分。应用配对t检验比较高血压对照组和非高血压对照组局部麻醉前后的血压变化。结果:非高血压患者的收缩压和舒张压均有统计学意义的升高(p=0.008,p=0.017)。然而,对照高血压患者的情况并非如此。收缩压有统计学意义的升高(p<0.001)。注射疼痛(非高血压患者为50%,对照高血压患者为48%)是两组中唯一报告的药物不良反应。结论:2%盐酸利多卡因和肾上腺素(1:200000)可提高高血压患者的收缩压,但不能提高舒张压
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study on Effects of 2% Lidocaine Hydrochloride with Adrenaline (1:200000) on Blood Pressure Among Controlled Hypertensive and Non-hypertensive Patients During Dental Anesthesia
Introduction: Local anesthetic used for dental extraction is 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:200000). Lidocaine is cardiac depressant and adrenaline is cardiac stimulant; it decreases or increases blood pressure respectively. Methods: A total of 100 patients (50 controlled hypertensive and 50 non-hypertensive) were selected. The study was conducted over a period of 14 months from January 2020 to February 2021. Blood pressure was measured for patients who were planned for dental extraction by auscultatory method. Following that, 1.5-3 ml (depending upon the nerve block) 2% lidocaine with adrenaline (1:200000) was injected using a 3ml syringe (26 Gauge). Blood pressure was re-recorded after 10 minutes from the time of injection. Visual analog scale pain score was obtained during administration of local anesthesia. Paired t-test was applied to compare blood pressure change before and after administration of local anesthesia in controlled hypertensive and non-hypertensive patients. Results: There was a statistically significant increase in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in non-hypertensive patients (p = 0.008, p = 0.017). This, however, was not the case with controlled hypertensive patients. There was statistically significant increase in systolic blood pressure (p < 0.001). Pain on injection (50% in non-hypertensive and 48% in controlled hypertensive patients) was the only adverse drug reaction that was reported in both groups. Conclusion: 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:200000) increased systolic but not diastolic blood pressure in controlled hypertensive patients
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Anatomical Variations of Renal Artery in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography of Abdomen: A Hospital-based Cross-sectional Study Knowledge, Practices and Anxiety related to Corona Virus Disease-19 (COVID -19) among Nursing Students in Nepal Clinical Nurses’ Knowledge and Attitude on Palliative Care: A Cross-Sectional Study Pregnant Women’s Mental Health Status and its Related Factors Amidst COVID-19: A Cross- Sectional Study Morphological Variation of Circle of Willis in Nepali Population: A 3D Time-of-Flight Magnetic Resonance Angiography Based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1