{"title":"吊舱式破冰船冰上性能的全尺寸/模型尺寸比较及抗弯强度测试研究","authors":"Jungyong Wang, Jeffrey Brown, R. Frederking","doi":"10.5957/josr.09210031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This paper provides the results of model tests in ice to evaluate the performance of the USCG Mackinaw Icebreaker that was equipped with two podded propulsors and compares with the data obtained from the full-scale ice trials. The objective of this collaborative model test program between the NRC and USCG was to understand the capability and limitation of the model tests with podded vessels in ice. As a result, the model tests showed a good agreement with attainable speeds at selected power levels but an overestimation of the ice resistance by an average of 7% (from 10% to 25%). Further discussion of podded icebreaker performance including turning circle tests in ice is provided and future work is proposed. This paper also provides a discussion of two different flexural strength test methods, which are simple beam and cantilever beam tests.\n \n \n \n The number of icebreakers with podded propulsors has been increasing in recent years and many new icebreakers are planning to use the pods because of high maneuverability and additional benefits such as low noise and vibration, and various usages of the propeller wake. The first pod unit (1.3 MW) was installed in a utility vessel Seili in 1990. Since then, several ice-going tankers/ icebreakers have used single or multiple pod units, which had up to 16 MW power (Wilkman et al. 2018).\n","PeriodicalId":50052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ship Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Full-Scale/Model-Scale Comparison of Podded Icebreaker’s Performance in Ice with Flexural Strength Measurement Study\",\"authors\":\"Jungyong Wang, Jeffrey Brown, R. Frederking\",\"doi\":\"10.5957/josr.09210031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n This paper provides the results of model tests in ice to evaluate the performance of the USCG Mackinaw Icebreaker that was equipped with two podded propulsors and compares with the data obtained from the full-scale ice trials. The objective of this collaborative model test program between the NRC and USCG was to understand the capability and limitation of the model tests with podded vessels in ice. As a result, the model tests showed a good agreement with attainable speeds at selected power levels but an overestimation of the ice resistance by an average of 7% (from 10% to 25%). Further discussion of podded icebreaker performance including turning circle tests in ice is provided and future work is proposed. This paper also provides a discussion of two different flexural strength test methods, which are simple beam and cantilever beam tests.\\n \\n \\n \\n The number of icebreakers with podded propulsors has been increasing in recent years and many new icebreakers are planning to use the pods because of high maneuverability and additional benefits such as low noise and vibration, and various usages of the propeller wake. The first pod unit (1.3 MW) was installed in a utility vessel Seili in 1990. Since then, several ice-going tankers/ icebreakers have used single or multiple pod units, which had up to 16 MW power (Wilkman et al. 2018).\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":50052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ship Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ship Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5957/josr.09210031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ship Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5957/josr.09210031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Full-Scale/Model-Scale Comparison of Podded Icebreaker’s Performance in Ice with Flexural Strength Measurement Study
This paper provides the results of model tests in ice to evaluate the performance of the USCG Mackinaw Icebreaker that was equipped with two podded propulsors and compares with the data obtained from the full-scale ice trials. The objective of this collaborative model test program between the NRC and USCG was to understand the capability and limitation of the model tests with podded vessels in ice. As a result, the model tests showed a good agreement with attainable speeds at selected power levels but an overestimation of the ice resistance by an average of 7% (from 10% to 25%). Further discussion of podded icebreaker performance including turning circle tests in ice is provided and future work is proposed. This paper also provides a discussion of two different flexural strength test methods, which are simple beam and cantilever beam tests.
The number of icebreakers with podded propulsors has been increasing in recent years and many new icebreakers are planning to use the pods because of high maneuverability and additional benefits such as low noise and vibration, and various usages of the propeller wake. The first pod unit (1.3 MW) was installed in a utility vessel Seili in 1990. Since then, several ice-going tankers/ icebreakers have used single or multiple pod units, which had up to 16 MW power (Wilkman et al. 2018).
期刊介绍:
Original and Timely technical papers addressing problems of shipyard techniques and production of merchant and naval ships appear in this quarterly publication. Since its inception, the Journal of Ship Production and Design (formerly the Journal of Ship Production) has been a forum for peer-reviewed, professionally edited papers from academic and industry sources. As such, it has influenced the worldwide development of ship production engineering as a fully qualified professional discipline. The expanded scope seeks papers in additional areas, specifically ship design, including design for production, plus other marine technology topics, such as ship operations, shipping economic, and safety. Each issue contains a well-rounded selection of technical papers relevant to marine professionals.