吊舱式破冰船冰上性能的全尺寸/模型尺寸比较及抗弯强度测试研究

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Ship Research Pub Date : 2020-10-02 DOI:10.5957/josr.09210031
Jungyong Wang, Jeffrey Brown, R. Frederking
{"title":"吊舱式破冰船冰上性能的全尺寸/模型尺寸比较及抗弯强度测试研究","authors":"Jungyong Wang, Jeffrey Brown, R. Frederking","doi":"10.5957/josr.09210031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n This paper provides the results of model tests in ice to evaluate the performance of the USCG Mackinaw Icebreaker that was equipped with two podded propulsors and compares with the data obtained from the full-scale ice trials. The objective of this collaborative model test program between the NRC and USCG was to understand the capability and limitation of the model tests with podded vessels in ice. As a result, the model tests showed a good agreement with attainable speeds at selected power levels but an overestimation of the ice resistance by an average of 7% (from 10% to 25%). Further discussion of podded icebreaker performance including turning circle tests in ice is provided and future work is proposed. This paper also provides a discussion of two different flexural strength test methods, which are simple beam and cantilever beam tests.\n \n \n \n The number of icebreakers with podded propulsors has been increasing in recent years and many new icebreakers are planning to use the pods because of high maneuverability and additional benefits such as low noise and vibration, and various usages of the propeller wake. The first pod unit (1.3 MW) was installed in a utility vessel Seili in 1990. Since then, several ice-going tankers/ icebreakers have used single or multiple pod units, which had up to 16 MW power (Wilkman et al. 2018).\n","PeriodicalId":50052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ship Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Full-Scale/Model-Scale Comparison of Podded Icebreaker’s Performance in Ice with Flexural Strength Measurement Study\",\"authors\":\"Jungyong Wang, Jeffrey Brown, R. Frederking\",\"doi\":\"10.5957/josr.09210031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n This paper provides the results of model tests in ice to evaluate the performance of the USCG Mackinaw Icebreaker that was equipped with two podded propulsors and compares with the data obtained from the full-scale ice trials. The objective of this collaborative model test program between the NRC and USCG was to understand the capability and limitation of the model tests with podded vessels in ice. As a result, the model tests showed a good agreement with attainable speeds at selected power levels but an overestimation of the ice resistance by an average of 7% (from 10% to 25%). Further discussion of podded icebreaker performance including turning circle tests in ice is provided and future work is proposed. This paper also provides a discussion of two different flexural strength test methods, which are simple beam and cantilever beam tests.\\n \\n \\n \\n The number of icebreakers with podded propulsors has been increasing in recent years and many new icebreakers are planning to use the pods because of high maneuverability and additional benefits such as low noise and vibration, and various usages of the propeller wake. The first pod unit (1.3 MW) was installed in a utility vessel Seili in 1990. Since then, several ice-going tankers/ icebreakers have used single or multiple pod units, which had up to 16 MW power (Wilkman et al. 2018).\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":50052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ship Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ship Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5957/josr.09210031\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ship Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5957/josr.09210031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提供了在冰上进行的模型试验结果,以评估配备两个吊舱推进器的美国海军陆战队“麦基诺”号破冰船的性能,并与在冰上进行的全尺寸试验数据进行了比较。NRC和USCG之间的合作模型测试项目的目的是了解冰舱模型测试的能力和局限性。因此,模型试验表明,在选定的功率水平下,与可达到的速度很好地吻合,但对冰阻力的估计平均高估了7%(从10%到25%)。对破冰船的性能进行了进一步的讨论,包括在冰上的回转试验,并提出了今后的工作。本文还讨论了两种不同的抗弯强度试验方法,即简支梁试验和悬臂梁试验。近年来,采用吊舱式推进器的破冰船数量不断增加,许多新破冰船都计划采用吊舱式推进器,因为它具有高机动性和低噪音、低振动等附加优势,而且螺旋桨尾流的用途多种多样。首个吊舱装置(1.3 MW)于1990年安装在一艘多功能船Seili上。从那时起,几艘冰船/破冰船使用了单个或多个吊舱装置,其功率高达16兆瓦(Wilkman等人,2018)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Full-Scale/Model-Scale Comparison of Podded Icebreaker’s Performance in Ice with Flexural Strength Measurement Study
This paper provides the results of model tests in ice to evaluate the performance of the USCG Mackinaw Icebreaker that was equipped with two podded propulsors and compares with the data obtained from the full-scale ice trials. The objective of this collaborative model test program between the NRC and USCG was to understand the capability and limitation of the model tests with podded vessels in ice. As a result, the model tests showed a good agreement with attainable speeds at selected power levels but an overestimation of the ice resistance by an average of 7% (from 10% to 25%). Further discussion of podded icebreaker performance including turning circle tests in ice is provided and future work is proposed. This paper also provides a discussion of two different flexural strength test methods, which are simple beam and cantilever beam tests. The number of icebreakers with podded propulsors has been increasing in recent years and many new icebreakers are planning to use the pods because of high maneuverability and additional benefits such as low noise and vibration, and various usages of the propeller wake. The first pod unit (1.3 MW) was installed in a utility vessel Seili in 1990. Since then, several ice-going tankers/ icebreakers have used single or multiple pod units, which had up to 16 MW power (Wilkman et al. 2018).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ship Research
Journal of Ship Research 工程技术-工程:海洋
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Original and Timely technical papers addressing problems of shipyard techniques and production of merchant and naval ships appear in this quarterly publication. Since its inception, the Journal of Ship Production and Design (formerly the Journal of Ship Production) has been a forum for peer-reviewed, professionally edited papers from academic and industry sources. As such, it has influenced the worldwide development of ship production engineering as a fully qualified professional discipline. The expanded scope seeks papers in additional areas, specifically ship design, including design for production, plus other marine technology topics, such as ship operations, shipping economic, and safety. Each issue contains a well-rounded selection of technical papers relevant to marine professionals.
期刊最新文献
Experimental Investigation of Paint Roughness on the Resistance of a Flat Plate Risk Assessment Based on KDE of Ship Collision Candidates for Ship Routing Waterway Unmanned Underwater Vehicle Autonomy and Control near Submarines Using Actively Sampled Surrogates An Improved Emergency Blow Theoretical Model for Naval Submarine Blowing System and Experimental Verification Numerical Modeling of the Low-Medium Frequency Vibration and Acoustic Radiation of Underwater Vehicles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1