什么样的预测?评估基于主体的社会模拟中预测的不同方面

IF 3 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Social Research Methodology Pub Date : 2022-11-02 DOI:10.1080/13645579.2022.2137919
D. Anzola, César García-Díaz
{"title":"什么样的预测?评估基于主体的社会模拟中预测的不同方面","authors":"D. Anzola, César García-Díaz","doi":"10.1080/13645579.2022.2137919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Researchers have become increasingly interested in the potential use of agent-based modelling for the prediction of social phenomena, motivated by the desire, first, to further cement the method’s scientific status and, second, to participate in other scenarios, particularly in the aid of decision-making. This article contributes to the current discussion on prediction from the perspective of the disciplinary organisation of agent-based social simulation. It addresses conceptual and practical challenges pertaining to the community of practitioners, rather than individual instances of modelling. As such, it provides recommendations that invite both collective critical discussion and cooperation. The first two sections review conceptual challenges associated with the concept of prediction and its instantiation in the computational modelling of complex social phenomena. They identify methodological gaps and disagreements that warrant further analysis. The second two sections consider practical challenges related to the lack of a prediction framework that, on one hand, gives meaning and accommodates everyday prediction practices and, on the other hand, establishes more clearly the connection between prediction and other epistemic goals. This coordination at the practical level, it is claimed, might help to better position prediction with agent-based modelling within the larger social science’s methodological landscape.","PeriodicalId":14272,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology","volume":"26 1","pages":"171 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What kind of prediction? Evaluating different facets of prediction in agent-based social simulation\",\"authors\":\"D. Anzola, César García-Díaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13645579.2022.2137919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Researchers have become increasingly interested in the potential use of agent-based modelling for the prediction of social phenomena, motivated by the desire, first, to further cement the method’s scientific status and, second, to participate in other scenarios, particularly in the aid of decision-making. This article contributes to the current discussion on prediction from the perspective of the disciplinary organisation of agent-based social simulation. It addresses conceptual and practical challenges pertaining to the community of practitioners, rather than individual instances of modelling. As such, it provides recommendations that invite both collective critical discussion and cooperation. The first two sections review conceptual challenges associated with the concept of prediction and its instantiation in the computational modelling of complex social phenomena. They identify methodological gaps and disagreements that warrant further analysis. The second two sections consider practical challenges related to the lack of a prediction framework that, on one hand, gives meaning and accommodates everyday prediction practices and, on the other hand, establishes more clearly the connection between prediction and other epistemic goals. This coordination at the practical level, it is claimed, might help to better position prediction with agent-based modelling within the larger social science’s methodological landscape.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"171 - 191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2022.2137919\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2022.2137919","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要研究人员对基于代理的建模在预测社会现象中的潜在用途越来越感兴趣,其动机是:首先,希望进一步巩固该方法的科学地位,其次,希望参与其他场景,特别是帮助决策。本文从基于主体的社会模拟的学科组织的角度为当前关于预测的讨论做出了贡献。它解决了与从业者群体有关的概念和实践挑战,而不是建模的个别实例。因此,它提出了一些建议,既邀请集体批判性讨论,也邀请合作。前两节回顾了与预测概念及其在复杂社会现象计算建模中的实例化相关的概念挑战。它们确定了需要进一步分析的方法上的差距和分歧。后两部分考虑了与缺乏预测框架有关的实际挑战,该框架一方面赋予意义并适应日常预测实践,另一方面更明确地建立预测与其他认识目标之间的联系。据称,这种实践层面的协调可能有助于在更大的社会科学方法论视野中通过基于主体的建模更好地进行定位预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What kind of prediction? Evaluating different facets of prediction in agent-based social simulation
ABSTRACT Researchers have become increasingly interested in the potential use of agent-based modelling for the prediction of social phenomena, motivated by the desire, first, to further cement the method’s scientific status and, second, to participate in other scenarios, particularly in the aid of decision-making. This article contributes to the current discussion on prediction from the perspective of the disciplinary organisation of agent-based social simulation. It addresses conceptual and practical challenges pertaining to the community of practitioners, rather than individual instances of modelling. As such, it provides recommendations that invite both collective critical discussion and cooperation. The first two sections review conceptual challenges associated with the concept of prediction and its instantiation in the computational modelling of complex social phenomena. They identify methodological gaps and disagreements that warrant further analysis. The second two sections consider practical challenges related to the lack of a prediction framework that, on one hand, gives meaning and accommodates everyday prediction practices and, on the other hand, establishes more clearly the connection between prediction and other epistemic goals. This coordination at the practical level, it is claimed, might help to better position prediction with agent-based modelling within the larger social science’s methodological landscape.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
International Journal of Social Research Methodology SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Linking survey and Facebook data: mechanisms of consent and linkage Tate Liverpool’s Democracies: curatorial methodologies for exploring democracy An empirical evaluation of probing questions investigating question comprehensibility in web surveys A brief reply to David Byrne Effects of objective and perceived burden on response quality in web surveys
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1