婴儿利什曼原虫原性和无性系无尾线虫细胞免疫的比较

A. Najafi-Dastanaei, S. Ajdary, Khaze, Haiedeh Darabi, M. Alimohammadian
{"title":"婴儿利什曼原虫原性和无性系无尾线虫细胞免疫的比较","authors":"A. Najafi-Dastanaei, S. Ajdary, Khaze, Haiedeh Darabi, M. Alimohammadian","doi":"10.29252/vacres.5.2.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Leishmania infantum is the causative agent of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Cell-mediated immunity (CMI) is required to control leishmaniases. Therefore, simple tests that can evaluate the cellular immunity of the target populations can help to understand the immune status of the human subjects, their immunity to the re-infection and the evaluation of the effectiveness of the potential vaccines. Here, we compared antigens based on single clones of L. infantum promastigotes and axenic amastigotes by in vitro and in vivo tests. Methods: Using serial dilutions, L. infantum promastigotes were selected as single clones (PSC) or were grown under axenic conditions with succinate-tris to prepare amastigote-like single clones (ASC). Antigens prepared from PSC and ASC were then compared with typical Leishmania major and L. infantum amastigotes by SDS-PAGE, Western-blotting and proliferation tests as well as an in vivo delayed-type hypersensitivity test on guinea pigs. Results Both PSC and ASC exhibited a distinctive ~50-kDa band could be detected by Western-blotting. The proliferation tests results indicated that both PSC and ASC could cause higher lymphocyte proliferation compared to typical L. infantum and L. major promastigotes; however the differences were not significant. Moreover, both PSC and ASC had an ability to induce comparable DTH and hence CMI. Conclusion: Similar proliferation or delayed-type hypersensitivity could be caused with antigens based on PSC, ASC or the typical promastigotes and any of these reagents could potentially be used for in vivo detection of CMI in VL epidemiological or vaccine studies.","PeriodicalId":52727,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of cell-mediated immunity due to Leishmania infantum promastigotes and axenic amastigotes\",\"authors\":\"A. Najafi-Dastanaei, S. Ajdary, Khaze, Haiedeh Darabi, M. Alimohammadian\",\"doi\":\"10.29252/vacres.5.2.63\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Leishmania infantum is the causative agent of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Cell-mediated immunity (CMI) is required to control leishmaniases. Therefore, simple tests that can evaluate the cellular immunity of the target populations can help to understand the immune status of the human subjects, their immunity to the re-infection and the evaluation of the effectiveness of the potential vaccines. Here, we compared antigens based on single clones of L. infantum promastigotes and axenic amastigotes by in vitro and in vivo tests. Methods: Using serial dilutions, L. infantum promastigotes were selected as single clones (PSC) or were grown under axenic conditions with succinate-tris to prepare amastigote-like single clones (ASC). Antigens prepared from PSC and ASC were then compared with typical Leishmania major and L. infantum amastigotes by SDS-PAGE, Western-blotting and proliferation tests as well as an in vivo delayed-type hypersensitivity test on guinea pigs. Results Both PSC and ASC exhibited a distinctive ~50-kDa band could be detected by Western-blotting. The proliferation tests results indicated that both PSC and ASC could cause higher lymphocyte proliferation compared to typical L. infantum and L. major promastigotes; however the differences were not significant. Moreover, both PSC and ASC had an ability to induce comparable DTH and hence CMI. Conclusion: Similar proliferation or delayed-type hypersensitivity could be caused with antigens based on PSC, ASC or the typical promastigotes and any of these reagents could potentially be used for in vivo detection of CMI in VL epidemiological or vaccine studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29252/vacres.5.2.63\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/vacres.5.2.63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:婴儿利什曼原虫是内脏利什曼病(VL)的病原体。细胞介导免疫(CMI)是控制利什曼原虫所必需的。因此,可以评估目标人群细胞免疫的简单测试有助于了解人类受试者的免疫状态、他们对再次感染的免疫力以及对潜在疫苗有效性的评估。在这里,我们通过体外和体内测试比较了基于婴儿乳杆菌前鞭毛体和无菌无鞭毛体克隆的抗原。方法:采用连续稀释法,选择婴儿乳杆菌前鞭毛体作为单克隆(PSC),或在无菌条件下用琥珀酸三酯培养制备无鞭毛体样单克隆(ASC)。然后,通过SDS-PAGE、蛋白质印迹和增殖试验以及豚鼠体内延迟型超敏试验,将PSC和ASC制备的抗原与典型的主要利什曼原虫和婴儿利什曼氏无鞭毛虫进行比较。结果PSC和ASC均表现出明显的~(50)kDa条带。增殖试验结果表明,与典型的婴儿乳杆菌和主要前鞭毛乳杆菌相比,PSC和ASC均可引起更高的淋巴细胞增殖;但差异不显著。此外,PSC和ASC都具有诱导可比DTH的能力,从而诱导CMI。结论:基于PSC、ASC或典型前鞭毛体的抗原可能引起类似的增殖或迟发型超敏反应,这些试剂中的任何一种都有可能用于VL流行病学或疫苗研究中CMI的体内检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of cell-mediated immunity due to Leishmania infantum promastigotes and axenic amastigotes
Introduction: Leishmania infantum is the causative agent of visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Cell-mediated immunity (CMI) is required to control leishmaniases. Therefore, simple tests that can evaluate the cellular immunity of the target populations can help to understand the immune status of the human subjects, their immunity to the re-infection and the evaluation of the effectiveness of the potential vaccines. Here, we compared antigens based on single clones of L. infantum promastigotes and axenic amastigotes by in vitro and in vivo tests. Methods: Using serial dilutions, L. infantum promastigotes were selected as single clones (PSC) or were grown under axenic conditions with succinate-tris to prepare amastigote-like single clones (ASC). Antigens prepared from PSC and ASC were then compared with typical Leishmania major and L. infantum amastigotes by SDS-PAGE, Western-blotting and proliferation tests as well as an in vivo delayed-type hypersensitivity test on guinea pigs. Results Both PSC and ASC exhibited a distinctive ~50-kDa band could be detected by Western-blotting. The proliferation tests results indicated that both PSC and ASC could cause higher lymphocyte proliferation compared to typical L. infantum and L. major promastigotes; however the differences were not significant. Moreover, both PSC and ASC had an ability to induce comparable DTH and hence CMI. Conclusion: Similar proliferation or delayed-type hypersensitivity could be caused with antigens based on PSC, ASC or the typical promastigotes and any of these reagents could potentially be used for in vivo detection of CMI in VL epidemiological or vaccine studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vaccine Innovation for Dengue, Chikungunya, Zika and Yellow Fever: Accelerating Global Development Agenda and Partnerships in Post-COVID Era Immunoinformatics Approach for Designing an HPV Epitope-Based Vaccine Candidate Harboring Built-in Adjuvants The predominance of Newcastle disease virus genotype VII: genome diversity or poor cross-immunity of non-matched vaccines Commentary on Corneal Graft Rejection after COVID-19 Vaccination: Our Experience and Concerns The Healthcare Workers’ Vaccination – current Policy and Recommendations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1