底层收入群体的储蓄行为:财务效能和风险偏好是否有作用?

IF 2.1 Q2 ECONOMICS Economics & Sociology Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.14254/2071-789x.2021/14-2/3
S. Muhamad, Kusairi Suhal, N. Zamri
{"title":"底层收入群体的储蓄行为:财务效能和风险偏好是否有作用?","authors":"S. Muhamad, Kusairi Suhal, N. Zamri","doi":"10.14254/2071-789x.2021/14-2/3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"DOI: 10.14254/2071789X.2021/14-2/3 ABSTRACT. An immense concern of governments globalwide today is financial inclusion as one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Governments arrive at many solutions by addressing the policies to improve financial achievement, mainly through financial education programmes and specifically personal finance. Yet, financial management has such a broad scope and is not limited to just knowledge and financial literacy. Individuals are born with different confidence levels and non-identical financial abilities. This study investigates financial self-efficacy by applying psychometric instruments, risk preference and demography characteristics towards saving decision behaviour. The sample in the survey consisted of 479 respondents in Peninsular Malaysia that then became subject to structural equation modelling. The results show that financial self-efficacy is one of the critical factors that explain individual saving decision behaviour. Also, risk preference, gender and area (rural or urban) determine the saving decision behaviour. This paper also implicates that there might be a gap between the rural and urban levels of financial efficacy that needs government’s action to narrow it.","PeriodicalId":51663,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Sociology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Savings behaviour of bottom income group: Is there any role for financial efficacy and risk preference?\",\"authors\":\"S. Muhamad, Kusairi Suhal, N. Zamri\",\"doi\":\"10.14254/2071-789x.2021/14-2/3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"DOI: 10.14254/2071789X.2021/14-2/3 ABSTRACT. An immense concern of governments globalwide today is financial inclusion as one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Governments arrive at many solutions by addressing the policies to improve financial achievement, mainly through financial education programmes and specifically personal finance. Yet, financial management has such a broad scope and is not limited to just knowledge and financial literacy. Individuals are born with different confidence levels and non-identical financial abilities. This study investigates financial self-efficacy by applying psychometric instruments, risk preference and demography characteristics towards saving decision behaviour. The sample in the survey consisted of 479 respondents in Peninsular Malaysia that then became subject to structural equation modelling. The results show that financial self-efficacy is one of the critical factors that explain individual saving decision behaviour. Also, risk preference, gender and area (rural or urban) determine the saving decision behaviour. This paper also implicates that there might be a gap between the rural and urban levels of financial efficacy that needs government’s action to narrow it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics & Sociology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics & Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2021/14-2/3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789x.2021/14-2/3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

DOI: 10.14254 / 2071789 x。2021/14-2/3抽象。作为可持续发展目标(sdg)之一的普惠金融是当今全球各国政府非常关注的问题。各国政府主要通过金融教育方案,特别是个人理财,制定改善财务成就的政策,从而得出许多解决办法。然而,财务管理具有如此广泛的范围,并不仅仅局限于知识和金融素养。每个人生来都有不同的自信水平和不同的财务能力。本研究运用心理测量工具、风险偏好及人口学特征,探讨理财自我效能对储蓄决策行为的影响。调查样本由马来西亚半岛的479名受访者组成,然后成为结构方程模型的对象。结果表明,财务自我效能感是解释个体储蓄决策行为的关键因素之一。此外,风险偏好、性别和地区(农村或城市)决定了储蓄决策行为。本文还指出,城乡财政效能水平之间可能存在差距,需要政府采取行动来缩小差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Savings behaviour of bottom income group: Is there any role for financial efficacy and risk preference?
DOI: 10.14254/2071789X.2021/14-2/3 ABSTRACT. An immense concern of governments globalwide today is financial inclusion as one of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Governments arrive at many solutions by addressing the policies to improve financial achievement, mainly through financial education programmes and specifically personal finance. Yet, financial management has such a broad scope and is not limited to just knowledge and financial literacy. Individuals are born with different confidence levels and non-identical financial abilities. This study investigates financial self-efficacy by applying psychometric instruments, risk preference and demography characteristics towards saving decision behaviour. The sample in the survey consisted of 479 respondents in Peninsular Malaysia that then became subject to structural equation modelling. The results show that financial self-efficacy is one of the critical factors that explain individual saving decision behaviour. Also, risk preference, gender and area (rural or urban) determine the saving decision behaviour. This paper also implicates that there might be a gap between the rural and urban levels of financial efficacy that needs government’s action to narrow it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Economics and Sociology (ISSN 2306-3459 Online, ISSN 2071-789X Print) is a quarterly international academic open access journal published by Centre of Sociological Research in co-operation with University of Szczecin (Poland), Mykolas Romeris University (Lithuania), Dubcek University of Trencín, Faculty of Social and Economic Relations, (Slovak Republic) and University of Entrepreneurship and Law, (Czech Republic). The general topical framework of our publication include (but is not limited to): advancing socio-economic analysis of societies and economies, institutions and organizations, social groups, networks and relationships.[...] We welcome articles written by professional scholars and practitioners in: economic studies and philosophy of economics, political sciences and political economy, research in history of economics and sociological phenomena, sociology and gender studies, economic and social issues of education, socio-economic and institutional issues in environmental management, business administration and management of SMEs, state governance and socio-economic implications, economic and sociological development of the NGO sector, cultural sociology, urban and rural sociology and demography, migration studies, international issues in business risk and state security, economics of welfare.
期刊最新文献
Home-based telework: aspects of communication. Evidence from Hungary The role of information in shaping sustainable human behaviour Perceptions of the socioeconomic effects of Venezuelan migration among informal traders in Cartagena de Indias (Colombia) The effect of job insecurity on organizational trust during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from the aviation sector University-industry collaboration in R&D to reduce the informal economy and strengthen sustainable development
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1