全球历史上的医学文化、治疗特性和规律

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Osiris Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1086/713990
H. Tilley
{"title":"全球历史上的医学文化、治疗特性和规律","authors":"H. Tilley","doi":"10.1086/713990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This volume ofOsiris takes as its central goal the need to bridge studies of medical cultures, past and present, with studies of the law and legal cultures, encouraging a sustained and historically informed dialogue across all thesefields. It deliberately concentrates most attention on the nineteenth and twentieth centuries when medical and legal connections intensified, institutional structures proliferated, and a diverse set of laws and regulations arguably achieved global impact. The field of medical history, for all its accomplishments, still lacks clear and persuasive grand narratives that take all these dynamics into account or that explain their consequences. At the same time, disciplines focused on (bio)medical phenomena today—such as critical global health studies, medical humanities, and science and technology studies—are still insufficiently engaged with the voluminous literature produced by historians, including those focused on science, medicine, and technology. The blind spots this produces matter. Indeed, anyonewho ignores themultifaceted and entangled roots ofmedical and legal phenomena, or believes that the past is irrelevant because recent bioscientific and institutional changes have been so radical and rapid, tends to analyze current trends in ways that are themselvesmisleading. Put simply, disciplinary and professional silos continue to prevent scholars from developing empirically robust and historically nuanced studies of medicine and law on a global scale. This volume offers one path forward. Therapeutic Properties is premised on the idea that boundary work in medical activities has always been mediated and constituted by laws and legal thinking. It","PeriodicalId":54659,"journal":{"name":"Osiris","volume":"36 1","pages":"1 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/713990","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medical Cultures, Therapeutic Properties, and Laws in Global History\",\"authors\":\"H. Tilley\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/713990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This volume ofOsiris takes as its central goal the need to bridge studies of medical cultures, past and present, with studies of the law and legal cultures, encouraging a sustained and historically informed dialogue across all thesefields. It deliberately concentrates most attention on the nineteenth and twentieth centuries when medical and legal connections intensified, institutional structures proliferated, and a diverse set of laws and regulations arguably achieved global impact. The field of medical history, for all its accomplishments, still lacks clear and persuasive grand narratives that take all these dynamics into account or that explain their consequences. At the same time, disciplines focused on (bio)medical phenomena today—such as critical global health studies, medical humanities, and science and technology studies—are still insufficiently engaged with the voluminous literature produced by historians, including those focused on science, medicine, and technology. The blind spots this produces matter. Indeed, anyonewho ignores themultifaceted and entangled roots ofmedical and legal phenomena, or believes that the past is irrelevant because recent bioscientific and institutional changes have been so radical and rapid, tends to analyze current trends in ways that are themselvesmisleading. Put simply, disciplinary and professional silos continue to prevent scholars from developing empirically robust and historically nuanced studies of medicine and law on a global scale. This volume offers one path forward. Therapeutic Properties is premised on the idea that boundary work in medical activities has always been mediated and constituted by laws and legal thinking. It\",\"PeriodicalId\":54659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osiris\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/713990\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osiris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/713990\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osiris","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/713990","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

《奥西里斯》这本书的中心目标是将过去和现在的医学文化研究与法律和法律文化研究联系起来,鼓励在所有这些领域进行持续的、历史上知情的对话。它有意将大部分注意力集中在十九世纪和二十世纪,当时医疗和法律联系加强,体制结构激增,一套多样的法律法规可以说产生了全球影响。尽管医学史领域取得了诸多成就,但它仍然缺乏清晰而有说服力的宏大叙事,无法将所有这些动态考虑在内,也无法解释其后果。与此同时,当今关注(生物)医学现象的学科,如批判性全球健康研究、医学人文学科和科学技术研究,仍然没有充分参与历史学家撰写的大量文献,包括那些关注科学、医学和技术的文献。产生物质的盲点。事实上,任何人如果忽视了医学和法律现象的多方面和纠缠的根源,或者认为过去是无关紧要的,因为最近的生物科学和制度变革是如此激进和迅速,他们往往会以自己误导的方式分析当前的趋势。简言之,学科和专业的筒仓继续阻碍学者们在全球范围内对医学和法律进行实证研究和历史细致入微的研究。本卷提供了一条前进的道路。治疗性质的前提是,医疗活动中的边界工作始终是由法律和法律思维调解和构成的。它
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Medical Cultures, Therapeutic Properties, and Laws in Global History
This volume ofOsiris takes as its central goal the need to bridge studies of medical cultures, past and present, with studies of the law and legal cultures, encouraging a sustained and historically informed dialogue across all thesefields. It deliberately concentrates most attention on the nineteenth and twentieth centuries when medical and legal connections intensified, institutional structures proliferated, and a diverse set of laws and regulations arguably achieved global impact. The field of medical history, for all its accomplishments, still lacks clear and persuasive grand narratives that take all these dynamics into account or that explain their consequences. At the same time, disciplines focused on (bio)medical phenomena today—such as critical global health studies, medical humanities, and science and technology studies—are still insufficiently engaged with the voluminous literature produced by historians, including those focused on science, medicine, and technology. The blind spots this produces matter. Indeed, anyonewho ignores themultifaceted and entangled roots ofmedical and legal phenomena, or believes that the past is irrelevant because recent bioscientific and institutional changes have been so radical and rapid, tends to analyze current trends in ways that are themselvesmisleading. Put simply, disciplinary and professional silos continue to prevent scholars from developing empirically robust and historically nuanced studies of medicine and law on a global scale. This volume offers one path forward. Therapeutic Properties is premised on the idea that boundary work in medical activities has always been mediated and constituted by laws and legal thinking. It
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osiris
Osiris 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1936 by George Sarton, and relaunched by the History of Science Society in 1985, Osiris is an annual thematic journal that highlights research on significant themes in the history of science. Recent volumes have included Scientific Masculinities, History of Science and the Emotions, and Data Histories.
期刊最新文献
Front and Back Matter Notes on the Contributors Acknowledgments Statecraft by Algorithms Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1