离岸威胁和劳动力份额改变的产业关系——一个实证博弈分析

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Globalization and Development Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1515/jgd-2020-0060
T. Tamura, Natsuka Tokumaru
{"title":"离岸威胁和劳动力份额改变的产业关系——一个实证博弈分析","authors":"T. Tamura, Natsuka Tokumaru","doi":"10.1515/jgd-2020-0060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Research indicates that the labor share of the aggregate income has decreased steadily since the mid-1970s, i.e. when the globalization process began. This paper discusses the ways in which qualitative changes in globalization, coupled with increased offshoring, have changed industrial relationships. In our analysis, we consider a simple Nash bargaining model between employers and employees. Our model proposes the hypotheses that employees gain the power to increase their wages when employers do not have the option of offshoring. However, employees typically lose this power when employers possess an offshoring threat, culminating in wage deduction. Leveraging a panel set of data obtained from 18 OECD countries during the period 1975–2017, we have empirically confirmed these hypotheses by comparing the first phase of globalization—not characterized by an offshoring threat—with the second phase, which entails an offshoring threat. Our findings reveal that workers’ bargaining power, positively affects labor share in the first phase; however, it loses its effect in the second phase when offshoring exerts its negative effects on labor share. We conclude that a qualitative change in globalization with increased offshoring radically changed industrial relationship through the threat effect.","PeriodicalId":38929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Globalization and Development","volume":"12 1","pages":"117 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changed Industrial Relationship by Offshoring Threat and Labor Share: An Empirical Game-Theoretic Analysis\",\"authors\":\"T. Tamura, Natsuka Tokumaru\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/jgd-2020-0060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Research indicates that the labor share of the aggregate income has decreased steadily since the mid-1970s, i.e. when the globalization process began. This paper discusses the ways in which qualitative changes in globalization, coupled with increased offshoring, have changed industrial relationships. In our analysis, we consider a simple Nash bargaining model between employers and employees. Our model proposes the hypotheses that employees gain the power to increase their wages when employers do not have the option of offshoring. However, employees typically lose this power when employers possess an offshoring threat, culminating in wage deduction. Leveraging a panel set of data obtained from 18 OECD countries during the period 1975–2017, we have empirically confirmed these hypotheses by comparing the first phase of globalization—not characterized by an offshoring threat—with the second phase, which entails an offshoring threat. Our findings reveal that workers’ bargaining power, positively affects labor share in the first phase; however, it loses its effect in the second phase when offshoring exerts its negative effects on labor share. We conclude that a qualitative change in globalization with increased offshoring radically changed industrial relationship through the threat effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Globalization and Development\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 143\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Globalization and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2020-0060\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Globalization and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jgd-2020-0060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究表明,自20世纪70年代中期,即全球化进程开始以来,劳动收入占总收入的比例一直在稳步下降。本文讨论了全球化的质变,加上离岸外包的增加,如何改变了产业关系。在我们的分析中,我们考虑雇主和雇员之间的一个简单的纳什议价模型。我们的模型提出了这样的假设:当雇主没有离岸外包的选择时,雇员获得了提高工资的权力。然而,当雇主面临离岸外包威胁时,雇员通常会失去这种权力,最终导致工资被扣。利用1975年至2017年期间从18个经合组织国家获得的一组数据,我们通过比较全球化的第一阶段(不以离岸外包威胁为特征)和第二阶段(需要离岸外包威胁),从经验上证实了这些假设。我们的研究发现,在第一阶段,工人的议价能力正影响劳动份额;然而,在第二阶段,当离岸外包对劳动份额产生负面影响时,它的作用就消失了。我们的结论是,随着离岸外包的增加,全球化的质变通过威胁效应从根本上改变了产业关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Changed Industrial Relationship by Offshoring Threat and Labor Share: An Empirical Game-Theoretic Analysis
Abstract Research indicates that the labor share of the aggregate income has decreased steadily since the mid-1970s, i.e. when the globalization process began. This paper discusses the ways in which qualitative changes in globalization, coupled with increased offshoring, have changed industrial relationships. In our analysis, we consider a simple Nash bargaining model between employers and employees. Our model proposes the hypotheses that employees gain the power to increase their wages when employers do not have the option of offshoring. However, employees typically lose this power when employers possess an offshoring threat, culminating in wage deduction. Leveraging a panel set of data obtained from 18 OECD countries during the period 1975–2017, we have empirically confirmed these hypotheses by comparing the first phase of globalization—not characterized by an offshoring threat—with the second phase, which entails an offshoring threat. Our findings reveal that workers’ bargaining power, positively affects labor share in the first phase; however, it loses its effect in the second phase when offshoring exerts its negative effects on labor share. We conclude that a qualitative change in globalization with increased offshoring radically changed industrial relationship through the threat effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Globalization and Development
Journal of Globalization and Development Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Journal of Globalization and Development (JGD) publishes academic research and policy analysis on globalization, development, and in particular the complex interactions between them. The journal is dedicated to stimulating a creative dialogue between theoretical advances and rigorous empirical studies to push forward the frontiers of development analysis. It also seeks to combine innovative academic insights with the in-depth knowledge of practitioners to address important policy issues. JGD encourages diverse perspectives on all aspects of development and globalization, and attempts to integrate the best development research from across different fields with contributions from scholars in developing and developed countries. Topics: -Economic development- Financial investments- Development Aid- Development policies- Growth models- Sovereign debt
期刊最新文献
Grassroots Organizations and Women’s Empowerment in a Post-Conflict Region: Evidence from Women Organizations in Northern Uganda Income Inequality and External Wealth of Nations Capital Account Liberalization, Structural Change, and Female Employment Trade Liberalization and Gender Inequality in India: A Task Content of Occupations Approach The Gendered Effects of Globalization: Recent Evidence from Developing Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1