{"title":"石头、纸莎草、剪刀","authors":"Silas Klein Cardoso","doi":"10.15448/0103-314x.2020.2.39481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article problematizes the use of different disciplines in the interpretation of the so-called “Biblical World.” Arguing that a first step towards the critical biblical interpretation is the decision of a framework on which sources and related disciplines work, it presents different methodological frameworks for the juxtaposition, intersection, transcendence, or avoidance of disciplines to favor the critical biblical interpretation. Ultimately, the article presents a taxonomy of historical sources to tentatively propose an antidisciplinary framework to fuel innovation by focusing the research object.","PeriodicalId":30005,"journal":{"name":"Teocomunicacao","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rock, Papyrus, Scissors\",\"authors\":\"Silas Klein Cardoso\",\"doi\":\"10.15448/0103-314x.2020.2.39481\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article problematizes the use of different disciplines in the interpretation of the so-called “Biblical World.” Arguing that a first step towards the critical biblical interpretation is the decision of a framework on which sources and related disciplines work, it presents different methodological frameworks for the juxtaposition, intersection, transcendence, or avoidance of disciplines to favor the critical biblical interpretation. Ultimately, the article presents a taxonomy of historical sources to tentatively propose an antidisciplinary framework to fuel innovation by focusing the research object.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teocomunicacao\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teocomunicacao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15448/0103-314x.2020.2.39481\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teocomunicacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15448/0103-314x.2020.2.39481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The article problematizes the use of different disciplines in the interpretation of the so-called “Biblical World.” Arguing that a first step towards the critical biblical interpretation is the decision of a framework on which sources and related disciplines work, it presents different methodological frameworks for the juxtaposition, intersection, transcendence, or avoidance of disciplines to favor the critical biblical interpretation. Ultimately, the article presents a taxonomy of historical sources to tentatively propose an antidisciplinary framework to fuel innovation by focusing the research object.