小说对以文本为导向的电影研究的挑战

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 0 FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION New Review of Film and Television Studies Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1080/17400309.2022.2132072
Mario Slugan
{"title":"小说对以文本为导向的电影研究的挑战","authors":"Mario Slugan","doi":"10.1080/17400309.2022.2132072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Fiction film remains the privileged focus of text-oriented film studies despite the growing interest in other film forms. Fiction as a concept also organizes the field’s key taxonomy – fiction v. nonfiction – yet little work has been devoted to the notion of fiction itself. The work that does exist is either textualist or spectator centred. The article argues that this leads to significant issues. First, categorization of numerous films diverges significantly from the ordinary understanding of the fiction/nonfiction divide. Second, such categorization may lead to both misunderstanding of audience experience and ethical problems alike. Third, theoretical commitments revolving around indexicality although partially applicable to documentary cannot shed light on fiction contrary to numerous attempts to do so. Fourth, one of discipline’s key assumptions – fiction films change real-life beliefs – demands a theory of the relationship between fiction and belief that is currently absent in film studies. Closer scrutiny of the notion of fiction, the article argues, is necessary to dispel these issues. Specifically, the article advocates for 1) non-textualist accounts of fiction and 2) a theory of the relationship of fiction to imagination and belief.","PeriodicalId":43549,"journal":{"name":"New Review of Film and Television Studies","volume":"21 1","pages":"427 - 450"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiction as a challenge to text-oriented film studies\",\"authors\":\"Mario Slugan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17400309.2022.2132072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Fiction film remains the privileged focus of text-oriented film studies despite the growing interest in other film forms. Fiction as a concept also organizes the field’s key taxonomy – fiction v. nonfiction – yet little work has been devoted to the notion of fiction itself. The work that does exist is either textualist or spectator centred. The article argues that this leads to significant issues. First, categorization of numerous films diverges significantly from the ordinary understanding of the fiction/nonfiction divide. Second, such categorization may lead to both misunderstanding of audience experience and ethical problems alike. Third, theoretical commitments revolving around indexicality although partially applicable to documentary cannot shed light on fiction contrary to numerous attempts to do so. Fourth, one of discipline’s key assumptions – fiction films change real-life beliefs – demands a theory of the relationship between fiction and belief that is currently absent in film studies. Closer scrutiny of the notion of fiction, the article argues, is necessary to dispel these issues. Specifically, the article advocates for 1) non-textualist accounts of fiction and 2) a theory of the relationship of fiction to imagination and belief.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Review of Film and Television Studies\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"427 - 450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Review of Film and Television Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2022.2132072\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Review of Film and Television Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2022.2132072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"FILM, RADIO, TELEVISION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管人们对其他电影形式越来越感兴趣,但小说电影仍然是文本电影研究的重点。小说作为一个概念也组织了该领域的关键分类法——小说与非小说——但很少有工作致力于小说本身的概念。现存的作品要么是文本主义的,要么是以观众为中心的。文章认为,这导致了重大问题。首先,对众多电影的分类与对小说/非小说划分的普通理解大相径庭。其次,这种分类可能会导致对观众体验的误解和道德问题。第三,围绕指数性的理论承诺,尽管部分适用于纪录片,但与许多尝试相反,并不能揭示小说。第四,该学科的关键假设之一——小说电影改变了现实生活中的信念——要求建立一种关于小说和信念之间关系的理论,而这在电影研究中是缺失的。文章认为,有必要对小说的概念进行更仔细的审查,以消除这些问题。具体而言,本文主张1)对小说的非文本主义描述,2)关于小说与想象和信仰关系的理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fiction as a challenge to text-oriented film studies
ABSTRACT Fiction film remains the privileged focus of text-oriented film studies despite the growing interest in other film forms. Fiction as a concept also organizes the field’s key taxonomy – fiction v. nonfiction – yet little work has been devoted to the notion of fiction itself. The work that does exist is either textualist or spectator centred. The article argues that this leads to significant issues. First, categorization of numerous films diverges significantly from the ordinary understanding of the fiction/nonfiction divide. Second, such categorization may lead to both misunderstanding of audience experience and ethical problems alike. Third, theoretical commitments revolving around indexicality although partially applicable to documentary cannot shed light on fiction contrary to numerous attempts to do so. Fourth, one of discipline’s key assumptions – fiction films change real-life beliefs – demands a theory of the relationship between fiction and belief that is currently absent in film studies. Closer scrutiny of the notion of fiction, the article argues, is necessary to dispel these issues. Specifically, the article advocates for 1) non-textualist accounts of fiction and 2) a theory of the relationship of fiction to imagination and belief.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
The Australian film revival: 1970s, 1980s, and beyond Transformational ethics of film: thinking the cinemakeover in the film-philosophy debate A note of introduction Starmaker: David O. Selznick and the production of stars in the Hollywood studio system Mediating the elemental: an immaterialist ethics for ecomaterialist media theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1