他们看到我看到的了吗?更好地理解7Cs教学有效性框架

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Educational Assessment Pub Date : 2021-01-05 DOI:10.1080/10627197.2020.1858784
S. Phillips, Ronald F. Ferguson, Jacob F. S. Rowley
{"title":"他们看到我看到的了吗?更好地理解7Cs教学有效性框架","authors":"S. Phillips, Ronald F. Ferguson, Jacob F. S. Rowley","doi":"10.1080/10627197.2020.1858784","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT School systems are increasingly incorporating student perceptions of teaching effectiveness into educator accountability systems. Using Tripod’s 7Cs™ Framework of Teaching Effectiveness, this study examines key issues in validating student perception data for use in this manner. Analyses examine the internal structure of 7Cs scores and the extent to which scores predict key criteria. Results offer the first empirical evidence that 7Cs scores capture seven distinct dimensions of teaching effectiveness even as they also confirm prior research concluding 7Cs scores are largely unidimensional. At the same time, results demonstrate a modest relationship between 7Cs scores and teacher self-assessments of their own effectiveness. Together, findings suggest 7Cs scores can be used to collect meaningful information about over-arching effectiveness. However, additional evidence is warranted before giving 7Cs scores as much weight in high-stakes contexts as value-added test-score gains or expert classroom observations.","PeriodicalId":46209,"journal":{"name":"Educational Assessment","volume":"26 1","pages":"69 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10627197.2020.1858784","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do They See What I See? Toward a Better Understanding of the 7Cs Framework of Teaching Effectiveness\",\"authors\":\"S. Phillips, Ronald F. Ferguson, Jacob F. S. Rowley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10627197.2020.1858784\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT School systems are increasingly incorporating student perceptions of teaching effectiveness into educator accountability systems. Using Tripod’s 7Cs™ Framework of Teaching Effectiveness, this study examines key issues in validating student perception data for use in this manner. Analyses examine the internal structure of 7Cs scores and the extent to which scores predict key criteria. Results offer the first empirical evidence that 7Cs scores capture seven distinct dimensions of teaching effectiveness even as they also confirm prior research concluding 7Cs scores are largely unidimensional. At the same time, results demonstrate a modest relationship between 7Cs scores and teacher self-assessments of their own effectiveness. Together, findings suggest 7Cs scores can be used to collect meaningful information about over-arching effectiveness. However, additional evidence is warranted before giving 7Cs scores as much weight in high-stakes contexts as value-added test-score gains or expert classroom observations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Assessment\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"69 - 87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10627197.2020.1858784\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1858784\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1858784","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

摘要学校系统越来越多地将学生对教学有效性的看法纳入教育者问责制。使用三脚架的7Cs™ 在教学有效性框架下,本研究探讨了验证学生感知数据以这种方式使用的关键问题。分析考察了7Cs分数的内部结构以及分数预测关键标准的程度。研究结果提供了第一个经验证据,证明7Cs成绩反映了教学效果的七个不同维度,尽管它们也证实了先前的研究结论,即7Cs成绩在很大程度上是一维的。同时,研究结果表明,7Cs成绩与教师对自身效能的自我评估之间存在适度的关系。总之,研究结果表明,7Cs评分可以用来收集有关总体有效性的有意义的信息。然而,在高风险环境中,在给予7Cs分数与增值测试分数或专家课堂观察同等的权重之前,需要额外的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do They See What I See? Toward a Better Understanding of the 7Cs Framework of Teaching Effectiveness
ABSTRACT School systems are increasingly incorporating student perceptions of teaching effectiveness into educator accountability systems. Using Tripod’s 7Cs™ Framework of Teaching Effectiveness, this study examines key issues in validating student perception data for use in this manner. Analyses examine the internal structure of 7Cs scores and the extent to which scores predict key criteria. Results offer the first empirical evidence that 7Cs scores capture seven distinct dimensions of teaching effectiveness even as they also confirm prior research concluding 7Cs scores are largely unidimensional. At the same time, results demonstrate a modest relationship between 7Cs scores and teacher self-assessments of their own effectiveness. Together, findings suggest 7Cs scores can be used to collect meaningful information about over-arching effectiveness. However, additional evidence is warranted before giving 7Cs scores as much weight in high-stakes contexts as value-added test-score gains or expert classroom observations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Assessment
Educational Assessment EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Educational Assessment publishes original research and scholarship on the assessment of individuals, groups, and programs in educational settings. It includes theory, methodological approaches and empirical research in the appraisal of the learning and achievement of students and teachers, young children and adults, and novices and experts. The journal reports on current large-scale testing practices, discusses alternative approaches, presents scholarship on classroom assessment practices and includes assessment topics debated at the national level. It welcomes both conceptual and empirical pieces and encourages articles that provide a strong bridge between theory and/or empirical research and the implications for educational policy and/or practice.
期刊最新文献
Dialect and Mathematics Performance in African American Children Who Use AAE: Insights from Explanatory IRT and Error Analysis Raising the Bar: How Revising an English Language Proficiency Assessment for Initial English Learner Classification Affects Students’ Later Academic Achievements Monitoring Rater Quality in Observational Systems: Issues Due to Unreliable Estimates of Rater Quality Improving the Precision of Classroom Observation Scores Using a Multi-Rater and Multi-Timepoint Item Response Theory Model High Stakes Assessments in Primary Schools and Teachers’ Anxiety About Work
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1