风湿性二尖瓣狭窄患者的左心室功能

S. Mukherjee
{"title":"风湿性二尖瓣狭窄患者的左心室功能","authors":"S. Mukherjee","doi":"10.19080/JOCCT.2018.11.555825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The most common pathophysiologic cause of Mitral Stenosis (MS) is rheumatic disease [1]. Generally Left Ventricular (LV) systolic function is well preserved in isolated MS. LV chamber typically is normal or small. However, coexisting Mitral Regurgitation (MR), aortic valve disease, ischaemic heart disease, systemic hypertension, cardiomyopathy all may be responsible for elevation of Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure (LVEDP) [2]. Left Ventricular (LV) dysfunction has been described in pure Mitral Stenosis (MS), which may be a due to change in interaction between right and left ventricles, myocardial fibrosis or a chronic decrease in preload [3]. Even with normal ejection fraction (indicating preserved global left ventricular function), there can be impairment in long-axis function (measured by tissue Doppler echocardiography) [4]. Altered LV long-axis movement has been shown to be a sensitive indicator of early myocardial dysfunction. Atrial fibrillation has shown to cause impairment of LV function. Pulsed-wave Doppler tissue velocities have been proven to be a good tool for assessment of long-axis ventricular shortening and lengthening. In the echocardiographical assessment of LV function, the Ejection Fraction (EF), Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI), Doppler strain, and 2D strain have been widely used [5]. EF is the most widely used index of contractile function, but due to the visual component, assessment of endocardial excursion is subjective and has high inter-observer variability [6]. TDI and Doppler strain are characterized by limitations of angle dependence, limited spatial resolution and deformation analysis in one dimension [7]. 2D strain is a novel technique which evaluates LV systolic functions more objectively and quantitatively, and does not have the limitations seen in EF, TDI, and Doppler strain; thus, it has become more commonly used in recent years [8]. In the diagnosis of LV dysfunction due to MS, some studies have shown EF, TDI, and Doppler strain to be useful however there is paucity of data. There are also very few studies combining both conventional and 2D strain echo for evaluation of LV systolic function after successful Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy (PBMV). There are also lack of evidences comparing LV systolic function before and after the above-mentioned procedure in patients with severe rheumatic MS.","PeriodicalId":73635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis\",\"authors\":\"S. Mukherjee\",\"doi\":\"10.19080/JOCCT.2018.11.555825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The most common pathophysiologic cause of Mitral Stenosis (MS) is rheumatic disease [1]. Generally Left Ventricular (LV) systolic function is well preserved in isolated MS. LV chamber typically is normal or small. However, coexisting Mitral Regurgitation (MR), aortic valve disease, ischaemic heart disease, systemic hypertension, cardiomyopathy all may be responsible for elevation of Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure (LVEDP) [2]. Left Ventricular (LV) dysfunction has been described in pure Mitral Stenosis (MS), which may be a due to change in interaction between right and left ventricles, myocardial fibrosis or a chronic decrease in preload [3]. Even with normal ejection fraction (indicating preserved global left ventricular function), there can be impairment in long-axis function (measured by tissue Doppler echocardiography) [4]. Altered LV long-axis movement has been shown to be a sensitive indicator of early myocardial dysfunction. Atrial fibrillation has shown to cause impairment of LV function. Pulsed-wave Doppler tissue velocities have been proven to be a good tool for assessment of long-axis ventricular shortening and lengthening. In the echocardiographical assessment of LV function, the Ejection Fraction (EF), Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI), Doppler strain, and 2D strain have been widely used [5]. EF is the most widely used index of contractile function, but due to the visual component, assessment of endocardial excursion is subjective and has high inter-observer variability [6]. TDI and Doppler strain are characterized by limitations of angle dependence, limited spatial resolution and deformation analysis in one dimension [7]. 2D strain is a novel technique which evaluates LV systolic functions more objectively and quantitatively, and does not have the limitations seen in EF, TDI, and Doppler strain; thus, it has become more commonly used in recent years [8]. In the diagnosis of LV dysfunction due to MS, some studies have shown EF, TDI, and Doppler strain to be useful however there is paucity of data. There are also very few studies combining both conventional and 2D strain echo for evaluation of LV systolic function after successful Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy (PBMV). There are also lack of evidences comparing LV systolic function before and after the above-mentioned procedure in patients with severe rheumatic MS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19080/JOCCT.2018.11.555825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/JOCCT.2018.11.555825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

二尖瓣狭窄(MS)最常见的病理生理原因是风湿性疾病[1]。一般来说,在孤立的MS中,左心室(LV)收缩功能保持良好。LV室通常正常或较小。然而,共存的二尖瓣反流(MR)、主动脉瓣疾病、缺血性心脏病、系统性高血压和心肌病都可能是左心室舒张末期压(LVEDP)升高的原因[2]。纯二尖瓣狭窄(MS)中描述了左心室(LV)功能障碍,这可能是由于左右心室之间相互作用的变化、心肌纤维化或预负荷的慢性降低[3]。即使射血分数正常(表明整体左心室功能保持),长轴功能也可能受损(通过组织多普勒超声心动图测量)[4]。左心室长轴运动改变已被证明是早期心肌功能障碍的敏感指标。心房颤动已显示会导致左心室功能受损。脉冲波多普勒组织速度已被证明是评估长轴心室缩短和延长的良好工具。在左心室功能的超声心动图评估中,射血分数(EF)、组织多普勒成像(TDI)、多普勒应变和2D应变已被广泛使用[5]。EF是最广泛使用的收缩功能指标,但由于视觉成分的原因,心内膜偏移的评估是主观的,并且具有很高的观察者间变异性[6]。TDI和多普勒应变的特点是角度依赖性有限、空间分辨率有限和一维变形分析[7]。2D应变是一种更客观、定量地评估左心室收缩功能的新技术,不具有EF、TDI和多普勒应变的局限性;因此,近年来它的使用越来越普遍[8]。在MS引起的左心室功能障碍的诊断中,一些研究表明EF、TDI和多普勒应变是有用的,但缺乏数据。也很少有研究结合传统和2D应变回波来评估经皮球囊二尖瓣切开术(PBMV)成功后的左心室收缩功能。在严重风湿性多发性硬化症患者中,也缺乏比较上述手术前后左心室收缩功能的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Rheumatic Mitral Stenosis
The most common pathophysiologic cause of Mitral Stenosis (MS) is rheumatic disease [1]. Generally Left Ventricular (LV) systolic function is well preserved in isolated MS. LV chamber typically is normal or small. However, coexisting Mitral Regurgitation (MR), aortic valve disease, ischaemic heart disease, systemic hypertension, cardiomyopathy all may be responsible for elevation of Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure (LVEDP) [2]. Left Ventricular (LV) dysfunction has been described in pure Mitral Stenosis (MS), which may be a due to change in interaction between right and left ventricles, myocardial fibrosis or a chronic decrease in preload [3]. Even with normal ejection fraction (indicating preserved global left ventricular function), there can be impairment in long-axis function (measured by tissue Doppler echocardiography) [4]. Altered LV long-axis movement has been shown to be a sensitive indicator of early myocardial dysfunction. Atrial fibrillation has shown to cause impairment of LV function. Pulsed-wave Doppler tissue velocities have been proven to be a good tool for assessment of long-axis ventricular shortening and lengthening. In the echocardiographical assessment of LV function, the Ejection Fraction (EF), Tissue Doppler Imaging (TDI), Doppler strain, and 2D strain have been widely used [5]. EF is the most widely used index of contractile function, but due to the visual component, assessment of endocardial excursion is subjective and has high inter-observer variability [6]. TDI and Doppler strain are characterized by limitations of angle dependence, limited spatial resolution and deformation analysis in one dimension [7]. 2D strain is a novel technique which evaluates LV systolic functions more objectively and quantitatively, and does not have the limitations seen in EF, TDI, and Doppler strain; thus, it has become more commonly used in recent years [8]. In the diagnosis of LV dysfunction due to MS, some studies have shown EF, TDI, and Doppler strain to be useful however there is paucity of data. There are also very few studies combining both conventional and 2D strain echo for evaluation of LV systolic function after successful Percutaneous Balloon Mitral Valvotomy (PBMV). There are also lack of evidences comparing LV systolic function before and after the above-mentioned procedure in patients with severe rheumatic MS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Detection of Myocarditis in Patients Recovered from COVID-19 Ldl-c Levels In Secondary Prevention: The Lower The Better and The Sooner The Better Mechanical Pulmonary Valve Thrombosis: Recurrence and Response to Thrombolytic Therapy Ocular Ischemic Syndrome as a Clue for Carotid Artery Stenosis The results of Percutaneous Transcatheter Pulmonary valvuloplasty in Adult Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1