加性高斯白噪声和瑞利衰落信道中16-QAM和64-QAM调制的比较分析

Khoirun Ni’amah, M. J. K. Praja, Yuninda Dwianti Marimbun
{"title":"加性高斯白噪声和瑞利衰落信道中16-QAM和64-QAM调制的比较分析","authors":"Khoirun Ni’amah, M. J. K. Praja, Yuninda Dwianti Marimbun","doi":"10.24114/cess.v7i1.26729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This reseach simulates and analyzes paramaters bit error rate (BER) of 16-QAM and 64-QAM modulation on Additive White Gaussian Noise and Rayleigh Fading channels. This research aims to determine 5G modulation with the level of data quality after the transmission process is carried out. The modulation simulation results obtained will be compared with the theoretical bit error rate (BER). The simulation results obtained from the two channel scenarios used are 16-QAM modulation reaching BER 10-4, AWGN channel only requires 15 dB Eb/N0 and for Rayleigh Fading channel it requires 38 dB Eb/N0. The BER theoretical results obtained for the 16-QAM modulation of the AWGN channel have a difference of 3 dB with the simulation results, while for the Rayleigh Fading channel it is 5 dB. Then, the simulation results of 64-QAM modulation AWGN channel to achieve BER 10-4 requires Eb/N0 of 24.6 dB, Rayleigh Fading of 47 dB. The theoretical results of BER obtained for the 64-QAM modulation of the AWGN channel have a difference of 1 dB with the simulation results, while for the Rayleigh Fading channel it is 0.5 dB. In this study, between 16-QAM and 64-QAM 5G modulation is more suitable to use 16-QAM modulation because it requires less power to achieve the desired BER 10-4.","PeriodicalId":53361,"journal":{"name":"CESS Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of 16-QAM and 64-QAM Modulation in Additive White Gaussian Noise and Rayleigh Fading Channels\",\"authors\":\"Khoirun Ni’amah, M. J. K. Praja, Yuninda Dwianti Marimbun\",\"doi\":\"10.24114/cess.v7i1.26729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This reseach simulates and analyzes paramaters bit error rate (BER) of 16-QAM and 64-QAM modulation on Additive White Gaussian Noise and Rayleigh Fading channels. This research aims to determine 5G modulation with the level of data quality after the transmission process is carried out. The modulation simulation results obtained will be compared with the theoretical bit error rate (BER). The simulation results obtained from the two channel scenarios used are 16-QAM modulation reaching BER 10-4, AWGN channel only requires 15 dB Eb/N0 and for Rayleigh Fading channel it requires 38 dB Eb/N0. The BER theoretical results obtained for the 16-QAM modulation of the AWGN channel have a difference of 3 dB with the simulation results, while for the Rayleigh Fading channel it is 5 dB. Then, the simulation results of 64-QAM modulation AWGN channel to achieve BER 10-4 requires Eb/N0 of 24.6 dB, Rayleigh Fading of 47 dB. The theoretical results of BER obtained for the 64-QAM modulation of the AWGN channel have a difference of 1 dB with the simulation results, while for the Rayleigh Fading channel it is 0.5 dB. In this study, between 16-QAM and 64-QAM 5G modulation is more suitable to use 16-QAM modulation because it requires less power to achieve the desired BER 10-4.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CESS Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CESS Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24114/cess.v7i1.26729\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CESS Journal of Computer Engineering System and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24114/cess.v7i1.26729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究模拟分析了16-QAM和64-QAM调制在加性高斯白噪声和瑞利衰落信道上的参数误码率。本研究旨在确定5G调制与传输过程后的数据质量水平。将获得的调制模拟结果与理论误码率(BER)进行比较。从使用的两种信道场景中获得的模拟结果是达到BER 10-4的16-QAM调制,AWGN信道只需要15dB Eb/N0,对于瑞利衰落信道,它需要38dB Eb/NO。AWGN信道的16-QAM调制的BER理论结果与仿真结果相差3dB,而瑞利衰落信道的BER为5dB。然后,对64-QAM调制AWGN信道实现BER 10-4的仿真结果要求Eb/N0为24.6dB,瑞利衰落为47dB。AWGN信道的64-QAM调制的BER理论结果与仿真结果相差1dB,而瑞利衰落信道的BER为0.5dB。在本研究中,在16-QAM和64-QAM之间,5G调制更适合使用16-QAM调制,因为它需要更少的功率来实现所需的BER 10-4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis of 16-QAM and 64-QAM Modulation in Additive White Gaussian Noise and Rayleigh Fading Channels
This reseach simulates and analyzes paramaters bit error rate (BER) of 16-QAM and 64-QAM modulation on Additive White Gaussian Noise and Rayleigh Fading channels. This research aims to determine 5G modulation with the level of data quality after the transmission process is carried out. The modulation simulation results obtained will be compared with the theoretical bit error rate (BER). The simulation results obtained from the two channel scenarios used are 16-QAM modulation reaching BER 10-4, AWGN channel only requires 15 dB Eb/N0 and for Rayleigh Fading channel it requires 38 dB Eb/N0. The BER theoretical results obtained for the 16-QAM modulation of the AWGN channel have a difference of 3 dB with the simulation results, while for the Rayleigh Fading channel it is 5 dB. Then, the simulation results of 64-QAM modulation AWGN channel to achieve BER 10-4 requires Eb/N0 of 24.6 dB, Rayleigh Fading of 47 dB. The theoretical results of BER obtained for the 64-QAM modulation of the AWGN channel have a difference of 1 dB with the simulation results, while for the Rayleigh Fading channel it is 0.5 dB. In this study, between 16-QAM and 64-QAM 5G modulation is more suitable to use 16-QAM modulation because it requires less power to achieve the desired BER 10-4.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Implementation of the Multimedia Development Life Cycle in Making Educational Games About Indonesia Data Mining Algorithm Decision Tree Itterative Dechotomiser 3 (ID3) for Classification of Stroke Implementation of Weight Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) on the Selection of Online English Course Platforms Usability of Brain Tumor Detection Using the DNN (Deep Neural Network) Method Based on Medical Image on DICOM Performance Comparison Analysis of Multi Prime RSA and Multi Power RSA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1