从挤压到挤压

IF 1.6 Q2 COMMUNICATION Journal of Language and Sexuality Pub Date : 2023-07-13 DOI:10.1075/jls.22004.fin
J. Fine
{"title":"从挤压到挤压","authors":"J. Fine","doi":"10.1075/jls.22004.fin","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Previous research on language, sexuality, and affect has focused primarily on the presence rather than the absence\n of desire. This analysis investigates the linguistic manifestations of non-desire on two subreddits: r/AskReddit and r/Asexual.\n Contrasting asexual redditors’ responses to threads such as When and how did you realize you were asexual? with\n straight, allosexual redditors’ responses to a thread titled Straight redditors, when did you realize you were\n straight?, I find that allosexual and asexual redditors’ responses differ in agency and emotionality. While straight\n allosexual redditors attribute their lack of homosexual desire to factors other than themselves, asexual redditors attribute their\n lack of allosexual desire to their own identity. Additionally, asexual redditors frame their realizations of their asexuality as\n processual and emotional, using feel and felt more often than straight allosexual redditors’\n responses. These results expose the importance of emotionality – including lack of desire – as a resource for asexual identity\n construction.","PeriodicalId":36680,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From crushes to squishes\",\"authors\":\"J. Fine\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/jls.22004.fin\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Previous research on language, sexuality, and affect has focused primarily on the presence rather than the absence\\n of desire. This analysis investigates the linguistic manifestations of non-desire on two subreddits: r/AskReddit and r/Asexual.\\n Contrasting asexual redditors’ responses to threads such as When and how did you realize you were asexual? with\\n straight, allosexual redditors’ responses to a thread titled Straight redditors, when did you realize you were\\n straight?, I find that allosexual and asexual redditors’ responses differ in agency and emotionality. While straight\\n allosexual redditors attribute their lack of homosexual desire to factors other than themselves, asexual redditors attribute their\\n lack of allosexual desire to their own identity. Additionally, asexual redditors frame their realizations of their asexuality as\\n processual and emotional, using feel and felt more often than straight allosexual redditors’\\n responses. These results expose the importance of emotionality – including lack of desire – as a resource for asexual identity\\n construction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Language and Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.22004.fin\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Language and Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.22004.fin","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前关于语言、性和情感的研究主要集中在欲望的存在而不是不存在上。本分析调查了非欲望在两个子版块r/AskReddit和r/As无性上的语言表现。对比无性红编辑对诸如你何时以及如何意识到自己是无性恋之类的话题的反应?异性恋的redditors对一个名为straight redditors的帖子的回应,你什么时候意识到自己是异性恋的?,我发现异性恋者和无性恋者的反应在能动性和情感性上有所不同。异性恋红人将他们缺乏同性恋欲望归因于自身以外的因素,而无性恋红人则将他们缺乏异性欲望归因于自己的身份。此外,无性恋Redditor将他们对无性恋的认识界定为过程性和情感性的,比异性恋redditors的反应更频繁地使用感觉和感觉。这些结果揭示了情感的重要性——包括缺乏欲望——作为无性身份构建的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From crushes to squishes
Previous research on language, sexuality, and affect has focused primarily on the presence rather than the absence of desire. This analysis investigates the linguistic manifestations of non-desire on two subreddits: r/AskReddit and r/Asexual. Contrasting asexual redditors’ responses to threads such as When and how did you realize you were asexual? with straight, allosexual redditors’ responses to a thread titled Straight redditors, when did you realize you were straight?, I find that allosexual and asexual redditors’ responses differ in agency and emotionality. While straight allosexual redditors attribute their lack of homosexual desire to factors other than themselves, asexual redditors attribute their lack of allosexual desire to their own identity. Additionally, asexual redditors frame their realizations of their asexuality as processual and emotional, using feel and felt more often than straight allosexual redditors’ responses. These results expose the importance of emotionality – including lack of desire – as a resource for asexual identity construction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Language and Sexuality
Journal of Language and Sexuality Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.50%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Review of Pakuła (2021): Linguistic Perspectives on Sexuality in Education: Representations, Constructions, and Negotiations Review of Myketiak (2020): Online Sex Talk and the Social World: Mediated Desire Do “Chinese gays” come out? “You’re a woman now” Give it to her
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1