摄影与非殖民化想象

IF 0.4 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Visual Anthropology Pub Date : 2021-05-27 DOI:10.1080/08949468.2021.1908185
Pamila Gupta
{"title":"摄影与非殖民化想象","authors":"Pamila Gupta","doi":"10.1080/08949468.2021.1908185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The idea of a photographic image as “unfixed” is intriguing, full of possibility. Jennifer Bajorek takes this idea as her starting point for reading a range of historic images—studio portraits, popular magazines (Bingo specifically), advertisements, photojournalism, bureaucratic ID cards, and political photography, from the West African countries of Senegal and Benin. All these images are both beautiful and beautifully laid out in her monograph. The book is at the same time a fruitful project committed to decolonizing knowledge production around what old photographs produced during the second half of the longue dur ee of the 20th century can potentially mean, say and imagine for their subjects and for subsequent viewers (including those persons in the images, their future descendants and a global “we”) in the here-and-now of the 21st century. It is a form of ethnographic play in the image archive, and theory-making from and grounded in West Africa, two exciting endeavors that Bajorek urges scholars of African photography to participate in, and rightly so. The book includes small acts of decolonization, for example, that of changing West to “west” Africa (xiii), since the former is associated with the AOF (l’AfriqueOccidentale française), the French colonial administration that included Senegal, Benin, and six other colonies, which ended in 1960. Such writerly steps make possible a kind of sustained anticolonial reading and gesture to the potential of photography to do the hard work of decolonization. Bajorek smartly suggests (18) that a second “scramble for Africa” is currently taking place, more than a century after the Berlin Conference of 1884–85 (also known as the West Africa Conference), an event that saw rival colonial powers carving out niches across the subcontinent; only this time around it is curators and collectors swooping in to grab up and discover unknown African collections and artists to sell on the international art market. This second scramble for Africa then makes the urgency of visual research like hers that much more timely and important for self-determined decolonial preservation. The archive of images Bajorek unearths showcases human vulnerability at its sensorial best; emergent themes of belonging, affiliation, worldliness, and affect are just a sample few that help render the democratic power of this set of arresting (and mostly black-and-white) images produced at the tapered end of colonialism and through to the cusp and aftermath of colonial independence (1950s–80s). Photographs also effect change, a point not lost on Bajorek for","PeriodicalId":44055,"journal":{"name":"Visual Anthropology","volume":"34 1","pages":"274 - 275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08949468.2021.1908185","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Photography and Decolonial Imagination\",\"authors\":\"Pamila Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08949468.2021.1908185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The idea of a photographic image as “unfixed” is intriguing, full of possibility. Jennifer Bajorek takes this idea as her starting point for reading a range of historic images—studio portraits, popular magazines (Bingo specifically), advertisements, photojournalism, bureaucratic ID cards, and political photography, from the West African countries of Senegal and Benin. All these images are both beautiful and beautifully laid out in her monograph. The book is at the same time a fruitful project committed to decolonizing knowledge production around what old photographs produced during the second half of the longue dur ee of the 20th century can potentially mean, say and imagine for their subjects and for subsequent viewers (including those persons in the images, their future descendants and a global “we”) in the here-and-now of the 21st century. It is a form of ethnographic play in the image archive, and theory-making from and grounded in West Africa, two exciting endeavors that Bajorek urges scholars of African photography to participate in, and rightly so. The book includes small acts of decolonization, for example, that of changing West to “west” Africa (xiii), since the former is associated with the AOF (l’AfriqueOccidentale française), the French colonial administration that included Senegal, Benin, and six other colonies, which ended in 1960. Such writerly steps make possible a kind of sustained anticolonial reading and gesture to the potential of photography to do the hard work of decolonization. Bajorek smartly suggests (18) that a second “scramble for Africa” is currently taking place, more than a century after the Berlin Conference of 1884–85 (also known as the West Africa Conference), an event that saw rival colonial powers carving out niches across the subcontinent; only this time around it is curators and collectors swooping in to grab up and discover unknown African collections and artists to sell on the international art market. This second scramble for Africa then makes the urgency of visual research like hers that much more timely and important for self-determined decolonial preservation. The archive of images Bajorek unearths showcases human vulnerability at its sensorial best; emergent themes of belonging, affiliation, worldliness, and affect are just a sample few that help render the democratic power of this set of arresting (and mostly black-and-white) images produced at the tapered end of colonialism and through to the cusp and aftermath of colonial independence (1950s–80s). Photographs also effect change, a point not lost on Bajorek for\",\"PeriodicalId\":44055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visual Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"274 - 275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08949468.2021.1908185\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visual Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2021.1908185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2021.1908185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摄影图像“未固定”的想法很有趣,充满了可能性。詹妮弗·巴乔雷克将这个想法作为她阅读一系列历史图像的起点——来自西非国家塞内加尔和贝宁的工作室肖像、流行杂志(特别是Bingo)、广告、新闻摄影、官僚身份证和政治摄影。所有这些图像都是美丽的,并在她的专论中得到了很好的阐述。这本书同时也是一个富有成果的项目,致力于围绕20世纪后半叶制作的旧照片可能意味着的知识生产非殖民化,在21世纪的此时此地,为他们的主体和随后的观众(包括图像中的人、他们未来的后代和一个全球性的“我们”)说话和想象。这是图像档案中的一种民族志游戏,以及从西非出发并以西非为基础的理论制作,这是巴乔雷克敦促非洲摄影学者参与的两项令人兴奋的努力,这是正确的,由于前者与AOF(l'AfriqueOccidentale française)有关联,AOF是法国的殖民管理机构,包括塞内加尔、贝宁和其他六个殖民地,于1960年结束。这样的写作步骤使一种持续的反殖民阅读成为可能,并表明摄影有可能为非殖民化做艰苦的工作。巴乔雷克巧妙地提出(18)第二次“争夺非洲”目前正在发生,距离1884-85年的柏林会议(也称为西非会议)已经过去了一个多世纪,当时敌对的殖民大国在次大陆上开辟了一席之地;只是这一次,策展人和收藏家们蜂拥而至,寻找未知的非洲藏品和艺术家,在国际艺术市场上出售。第二次对非洲的争夺使得像她这样的视觉研究的紧迫性对于自决的非殖民化保护来说更加及时和重要。巴乔雷克发掘的图像档案展示了人类在感官上的脆弱性;归属、归属、世俗和情感等新兴主题只是少数几个例子,它们有助于展现这组引人注目(大多是黑白)的图像的民主力量,这些图像是在殖民主义逐渐结束,一直到殖民独立(20世纪50年代至80年代)的风口浪尖和余波中产生的。照片也会影响变化,这一点在巴焦雷克没有丢失
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Photography and Decolonial Imagination
The idea of a photographic image as “unfixed” is intriguing, full of possibility. Jennifer Bajorek takes this idea as her starting point for reading a range of historic images—studio portraits, popular magazines (Bingo specifically), advertisements, photojournalism, bureaucratic ID cards, and political photography, from the West African countries of Senegal and Benin. All these images are both beautiful and beautifully laid out in her monograph. The book is at the same time a fruitful project committed to decolonizing knowledge production around what old photographs produced during the second half of the longue dur ee of the 20th century can potentially mean, say and imagine for their subjects and for subsequent viewers (including those persons in the images, their future descendants and a global “we”) in the here-and-now of the 21st century. It is a form of ethnographic play in the image archive, and theory-making from and grounded in West Africa, two exciting endeavors that Bajorek urges scholars of African photography to participate in, and rightly so. The book includes small acts of decolonization, for example, that of changing West to “west” Africa (xiii), since the former is associated with the AOF (l’AfriqueOccidentale française), the French colonial administration that included Senegal, Benin, and six other colonies, which ended in 1960. Such writerly steps make possible a kind of sustained anticolonial reading and gesture to the potential of photography to do the hard work of decolonization. Bajorek smartly suggests (18) that a second “scramble for Africa” is currently taking place, more than a century after the Berlin Conference of 1884–85 (also known as the West Africa Conference), an event that saw rival colonial powers carving out niches across the subcontinent; only this time around it is curators and collectors swooping in to grab up and discover unknown African collections and artists to sell on the international art market. This second scramble for Africa then makes the urgency of visual research like hers that much more timely and important for self-determined decolonial preservation. The archive of images Bajorek unearths showcases human vulnerability at its sensorial best; emergent themes of belonging, affiliation, worldliness, and affect are just a sample few that help render the democratic power of this set of arresting (and mostly black-and-white) images produced at the tapered end of colonialism and through to the cusp and aftermath of colonial independence (1950s–80s). Photographs also effect change, a point not lost on Bajorek for
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Visual Anthropology
Visual Anthropology ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Visual Anthropology is a scholarly journal presenting original articles, commentary, discussions, film reviews, and book reviews on anthropological and ethnographic topics. The journal focuses on the study of human behavior through visual means. Experts in the field also examine visual symbolic forms from a cultural-historical framework and provide a cross-cultural study of art and artifacts. Visual Anthropology also promotes the study, use, and production of anthropological and ethnographic films, videos, and photographs for research and teaching.
期刊最新文献
“The People’s Garibaldi”: Twentieth-Century Politics of a Risorgimento Icon Into the Twentieth Century: Science and Entertainment, Two Realms Apart? The Material Politics of Graffiti Removal Contemporary Ethnographic Aesthetics: The TikTok Turn Photographing the Igbo Funeral: The Materiality of its Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1