{"title":"《爱-政治:20世纪20年代至70年代加拿大和美国的女同性恋婚礼实践》","authors":"Elise Chenier","doi":"10.7560/JHS27204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I n 1972 t h e B r o o k l y n B a s e d lesbian feminist periodical Echo of Sappho profiled Sandy and June, a white butch and femme couple, on the occasion of their recent wedding ceremony. Sandy and June were one among hundreds of same-sex couples who had exchanged vows at Father Robert Mary Clement’s Church of the Beloved Disciple, which opened in 1970 to cater to the spiritual needs of lesbians and gays. When asked how they felt about their wedding “in relationship to the women’s movement,” Sandy and June did not respond directly, describing instead what their marriage meant to them: it was “a holy union and very beautiful,” they said. “This church makes you feel as normal as anyone could be.” Sandy and June’s embrace of normal seems to anticipate the queer Left critique of the marriage equality movement that dominated American lesbian and gay politics in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Where once one’s outsider status provided a perch from which to critique how capitalism and liberal democratic states worked hand in hand to privatize sexuality and to advocate for collectivist responses to social inequalities and injustices, Lisa Duggan argues, the modern marriage equality movement “upholds, sustains, and seeks inclusion within . . . heterosexist institutions . . . while promising the possibility of a demobilized gay constituency and a privatized, depoliticized gay culture anchored in domesticity and consumption.” June and Sandy’s seeming inability to draw a connection","PeriodicalId":45704,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","volume":"27 1","pages":"294 - 321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Love-Politics: Lesbian Wedding Practices in Canada and the United States from the 1920s to the 1970s\",\"authors\":\"Elise Chenier\",\"doi\":\"10.7560/JHS27204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I n 1972 t h e B r o o k l y n B a s e d lesbian feminist periodical Echo of Sappho profiled Sandy and June, a white butch and femme couple, on the occasion of their recent wedding ceremony. Sandy and June were one among hundreds of same-sex couples who had exchanged vows at Father Robert Mary Clement’s Church of the Beloved Disciple, which opened in 1970 to cater to the spiritual needs of lesbians and gays. When asked how they felt about their wedding “in relationship to the women’s movement,” Sandy and June did not respond directly, describing instead what their marriage meant to them: it was “a holy union and very beautiful,” they said. “This church makes you feel as normal as anyone could be.” Sandy and June’s embrace of normal seems to anticipate the queer Left critique of the marriage equality movement that dominated American lesbian and gay politics in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Where once one’s outsider status provided a perch from which to critique how capitalism and liberal democratic states worked hand in hand to privatize sexuality and to advocate for collectivist responses to social inequalities and injustices, Lisa Duggan argues, the modern marriage equality movement “upholds, sustains, and seeks inclusion within . . . heterosexist institutions . . . while promising the possibility of a demobilized gay constituency and a privatized, depoliticized gay culture anchored in domesticity and consumption.” June and Sandy’s seeming inability to draw a connection\",\"PeriodicalId\":45704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the History of Sexuality\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"294 - 321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the History of Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7560/JHS27204\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/JHS27204","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
1972年,B r o k l y n B a s e d女同性恋女权主义期刊《萨福回声》在他们最近的婚礼上介绍了Sandy和June,一对白人男女伴侣。Sandy和June是在Robert Mary Clement神父的宠儿门徒教堂交换誓言的数百对同性伴侣之一,该教堂于1970年开业,旨在满足男女同性恋的精神需求。当被问及他们对“与妇女运动有关”的婚礼有何感受时,Sandy和June没有直接回应,而是描述了他们的婚姻对他们意味着什么:他们说,这是“神圣的结合,非常美丽”。“这座教堂让你感觉和任何人一样正常。”桑迪和琼对正常的拥抱似乎预示着酷儿左派对婚姻平等运动的批判,这场运动在20世纪末和21世纪初主导了美国男女同性恋政治。Lisa Duggan认为,曾经的局外人身份为批判资本主义和自由民主国家如何携手将性私有化并倡导集体主义应对社会不平等和不公正提供了一个平台,现代婚姻平等运动“维护、维持并寻求融入……异质存在的机构……同时承诺有可能出现一个复员的同性恋选民群体和一个以家庭生活和消费为基础的私有化、非政治化的同性恋文化。”
Love-Politics: Lesbian Wedding Practices in Canada and the United States from the 1920s to the 1970s
I n 1972 t h e B r o o k l y n B a s e d lesbian feminist periodical Echo of Sappho profiled Sandy and June, a white butch and femme couple, on the occasion of their recent wedding ceremony. Sandy and June were one among hundreds of same-sex couples who had exchanged vows at Father Robert Mary Clement’s Church of the Beloved Disciple, which opened in 1970 to cater to the spiritual needs of lesbians and gays. When asked how they felt about their wedding “in relationship to the women’s movement,” Sandy and June did not respond directly, describing instead what their marriage meant to them: it was “a holy union and very beautiful,” they said. “This church makes you feel as normal as anyone could be.” Sandy and June’s embrace of normal seems to anticipate the queer Left critique of the marriage equality movement that dominated American lesbian and gay politics in the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Where once one’s outsider status provided a perch from which to critique how capitalism and liberal democratic states worked hand in hand to privatize sexuality and to advocate for collectivist responses to social inequalities and injustices, Lisa Duggan argues, the modern marriage equality movement “upholds, sustains, and seeks inclusion within . . . heterosexist institutions . . . while promising the possibility of a demobilized gay constituency and a privatized, depoliticized gay culture anchored in domesticity and consumption.” June and Sandy’s seeming inability to draw a connection