对组织中有效的绩效管理体系的系统评审

Dickson Mdhlalose
{"title":"对组织中有效的绩效管理体系的系统评审","authors":"Dickson Mdhlalose","doi":"10.21776/ub.jam.2023.021.02.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the impact of Performance Management Systems (PMS) on employee and organizational performance. The researcher utilized exploratory research in the study because the investigation tries to identify known/unknown factors and evaluate established hypotheses. Data was gathered through secondary research methods. Online research was conducted. Secondary information was collected using many online search tools and specialized journals, textbooks, articles in scientific journals, and online sources related to the topic. Establishing an efficient PMS is a difficult task for organizations. There are a variety of PMS tools that exist. The 360-feedback approach is the most suited appraisal method for executing the PMS for employees in an organization. PMS enhances employee performance employees' performance fairly since connections between performance reviews and improved productivity do not hold. Managers' engagement, senior management involvement, and performance feedback are key indicators of PMS's efficacy. The relevance of this research contributes to the current body of knowledge about performance management systems. Organizations would find this study's conclusions valuable and intriguing. Organizations will comprehend the influence of a successful PMS on employee and organizational performance and, as a result, devise effective countermeasures or capitalize on the advantages. This study will bring about novel knowledge of PMS and further provide future research leads. Because of its reliance on secondary sources, this investigation could only include published academic papers that existed when the study was done.","PeriodicalId":32350,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN ORGANIZATIONS\",\"authors\":\"Dickson Mdhlalose\",\"doi\":\"10.21776/ub.jam.2023.021.02.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine the impact of Performance Management Systems (PMS) on employee and organizational performance. The researcher utilized exploratory research in the study because the investigation tries to identify known/unknown factors and evaluate established hypotheses. Data was gathered through secondary research methods. Online research was conducted. Secondary information was collected using many online search tools and specialized journals, textbooks, articles in scientific journals, and online sources related to the topic. Establishing an efficient PMS is a difficult task for organizations. There are a variety of PMS tools that exist. The 360-feedback approach is the most suited appraisal method for executing the PMS for employees in an organization. PMS enhances employee performance employees' performance fairly since connections between performance reviews and improved productivity do not hold. Managers' engagement, senior management involvement, and performance feedback are key indicators of PMS's efficacy. The relevance of this research contributes to the current body of knowledge about performance management systems. Organizations would find this study's conclusions valuable and intriguing. Organizations will comprehend the influence of a successful PMS on employee and organizational performance and, as a result, devise effective countermeasures or capitalize on the advantages. This study will bring about novel knowledge of PMS and further provide future research leads. Because of its reliance on secondary sources, this investigation could only include published academic papers that existed when the study was done.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2023.021.02.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2023.021.02.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定绩效管理系统(PMS)对员工和组织绩效的影响。研究人员在研究中使用探索性研究,因为调查试图识别已知/未知因素并评估已建立的假设。通过二次研究方法收集数据。进行了在线调查。次要信息是通过许多在线搜索工具和专业期刊、教科书、科学期刊上的文章以及与该主题相关的在线资源收集的。建立有效的PMS对组织来说是一项艰巨的任务。有各种各样的PMS工具存在。360-反馈方法是最适合于组织中对员工执行PMS的评估方法。PMS公平地提高了员工的绩效,因为绩效评估与提高生产率之间的联系并不成立。管理者的敬业度、高层管理者的参与度和绩效反馈是PMS有效性的关键指标。这项研究的相关性有助于目前关于绩效管理系统的知识体系。组织会发现这项研究的结论是有价值的和有趣的。组织将理解成功的PMS对员工和组织绩效的影响,因此,制定有效的对策或利用优势。本研究将为经前症候群的研究带来新的认识,并为今后的研究提供线索。由于它依赖于二手资料,这项调查只能包括研究完成时存在的已发表的学术论文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN ORGANIZATIONS
This study aims to determine the impact of Performance Management Systems (PMS) on employee and organizational performance. The researcher utilized exploratory research in the study because the investigation tries to identify known/unknown factors and evaluate established hypotheses. Data was gathered through secondary research methods. Online research was conducted. Secondary information was collected using many online search tools and specialized journals, textbooks, articles in scientific journals, and online sources related to the topic. Establishing an efficient PMS is a difficult task for organizations. There are a variety of PMS tools that exist. The 360-feedback approach is the most suited appraisal method for executing the PMS for employees in an organization. PMS enhances employee performance employees' performance fairly since connections between performance reviews and improved productivity do not hold. Managers' engagement, senior management involvement, and performance feedback are key indicators of PMS's efficacy. The relevance of this research contributes to the current body of knowledge about performance management systems. Organizations would find this study's conclusions valuable and intriguing. Organizations will comprehend the influence of a successful PMS on employee and organizational performance and, as a result, devise effective countermeasures or capitalize on the advantages. This study will bring about novel knowledge of PMS and further provide future research leads. Because of its reliance on secondary sources, this investigation could only include published academic papers that existed when the study was done.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
THE IMPACT OF CUSTOMER SATISFACTION, CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE, E-SERVICE QUALITY TO CUSTOMER TRUST IN PURCHASING DIGITAL PRODUCT AT THE MARKETPLACE EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC INFLUENCE OF PERCEIVED BRAND GLOBALNESS AND LOCALNESS: A CASE STUDY ON HIGH-INVOLVEMENT GOODS THE DIGITAL MARKETING TO INFLUENCE CUSTOMER SATISFACTION MEDIATED BY PURCHASE DECISION SYSTEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP INTENTION MODEL, FAMILY BACKGROUND, AND PRIOR ENTREPRENEURIAL EXPERIENCE ON STUDENTS’ ENTREPRENEURIAL INTENTION THE VALUE OF CATUR PURUSA ARTHA AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP ORIENTATION AS A BASE FOR MAXIMIZING SMEs PERFORMANCE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1