考察四年级课堂教师反馈的类型和方向,为教师备课提供信息

IF 1.2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Elementary School Journal Pub Date : 2023-07-06 DOI:10.1086/725668
E. Stevens, Philip Capin, Alicia A. Stewart, Elizabeth A. Swanson, S. Vaughn
{"title":"考察四年级课堂教师反馈的类型和方向,为教师备课提供信息","authors":"E. Stevens, Philip Capin, Alicia A. Stewart, Elizabeth A. Swanson, S. Vaughn","doi":"10.1086/725668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Providing academic feedback is strongly related to student achievement, yet there is little observational research examining the feedback provided by elementary classroom teachers. Informed by Hattie and Timperley’s model of feedback, we conducted an observation study examining the type and direction of feedback provided in 33 teachers’ fourth-grade social studies classrooms. Results showed teachers primarily repeated students’ answers (39.8%), followed by providing positive feedback (32.2%), praise (15.6%), and corrective feedback (11.8%). Most feedback was directed at the task. Teachers rarely provided combined positive and corrective feedback (0.5%) and infrequently directed feedback at the process or students’ self-regulation. These findings suggest teachers would benefit from support in providing effective feedback that is specific and supports students’ use of learning strategies and self-regulatory behavior. Implications for preservice and in-service teacher training related to providing effective feedback are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48010,"journal":{"name":"Elementary School Journal","volume":"124 1","pages":"109 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the Type and Direction of Teacher Feedback Provided In Fourth-Grade Classrooms to Inform Teacher Preparation\",\"authors\":\"E. Stevens, Philip Capin, Alicia A. Stewart, Elizabeth A. Swanson, S. Vaughn\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/725668\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Providing academic feedback is strongly related to student achievement, yet there is little observational research examining the feedback provided by elementary classroom teachers. Informed by Hattie and Timperley’s model of feedback, we conducted an observation study examining the type and direction of feedback provided in 33 teachers’ fourth-grade social studies classrooms. Results showed teachers primarily repeated students’ answers (39.8%), followed by providing positive feedback (32.2%), praise (15.6%), and corrective feedback (11.8%). Most feedback was directed at the task. Teachers rarely provided combined positive and corrective feedback (0.5%) and infrequently directed feedback at the process or students’ self-regulation. These findings suggest teachers would benefit from support in providing effective feedback that is specific and supports students’ use of learning strategies and self-regulatory behavior. Implications for preservice and in-service teacher training related to providing effective feedback are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Elementary School Journal\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"109 - 128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Elementary School Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/725668\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Elementary School Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725668","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提供学术反馈与学生成绩密切相关,但很少有观察性研究检查小学课堂教师提供的反馈。根据Hattie和Timperley的反馈模型,我们进行了一项观察研究,检查了33名教师在四年级社会研究课堂上提供的反馈的类型和方向。结果显示,教师以重复学生回答为主(39.8%),其次是积极反馈(32.2%)、表扬(15.6%)和纠正反馈(11.8%)。大多数反馈都是针对任务的。教师很少同时提供积极和纠正性反馈(0.5%),也很少针对过程或学生的自我调节提供直接反馈。这些发现表明,教师将受益于提供有效的反馈,这些反馈是具体的,支持学生使用学习策略和自我调节行为。讨论了提供有效反馈对职前和在职教师培训的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining the Type and Direction of Teacher Feedback Provided In Fourth-Grade Classrooms to Inform Teacher Preparation
Providing academic feedback is strongly related to student achievement, yet there is little observational research examining the feedback provided by elementary classroom teachers. Informed by Hattie and Timperley’s model of feedback, we conducted an observation study examining the type and direction of feedback provided in 33 teachers’ fourth-grade social studies classrooms. Results showed teachers primarily repeated students’ answers (39.8%), followed by providing positive feedback (32.2%), praise (15.6%), and corrective feedback (11.8%). Most feedback was directed at the task. Teachers rarely provided combined positive and corrective feedback (0.5%) and infrequently directed feedback at the process or students’ self-regulation. These findings suggest teachers would benefit from support in providing effective feedback that is specific and supports students’ use of learning strategies and self-regulatory behavior. Implications for preservice and in-service teacher training related to providing effective feedback are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Elementary School Journal
Elementary School Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Elementary School Journal has served researchers, teacher educators, and practitioners in the elementary and middle school education for over one hundred years. ESJ publishes peer-reviewed articles dealing with both education theory and research and their implications for teaching practice. In addition, ESJ presents articles that relate the latest research in child development, cognitive psychology, and sociology to school learning and teaching. ESJ prefers to publish original studies that contain data about school and classroom processes in elementary or middle schools while occasionally publishing integrative research reviews and in-depth conceptual analyses of schooling.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation and optimization of sequence-based gene regulatory deep learning models. “It’s Just Something That You Have to Do as a Teacher” Front Matter 41 Teachers, 41 Different Ways Predictable Variation in the Implementation of a Curricular Intervention—and Why it Matters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1