{"title":"超越二进制:批判性心理健康研究中的复杂角色和身份","authors":"E. Tseris, Scarlett Franks, Eva Bright Hart","doi":"10.1080/09687599.2022.2034111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, we discuss our experiences on a project that is exploring gendered harms experienced by women during involuntary mental health treatment. We outline our journey towards a more complex understanding of our roles in the project, by considering the aspects of our identities that are hidden when situating ourselves only in terms of survivor or non-survivor researchers. In addition, we discuss expectations that are often present in research projects for survivor researchers to publicly disclose highly personal experiences, while non-survivor researchers face no such demands, and the myth of a homogenous survivor researcher identity. We discuss how critiquing binary identities, while still acknowledging power and difference, may open up new ideas about creative and strategic approaches to challenging and resisting psy-oppression.","PeriodicalId":48208,"journal":{"name":"Disability & Society","volume":"37 1","pages":"718 - 723"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond binaries: complex roles and identities in critical mental health research\",\"authors\":\"E. Tseris, Scarlett Franks, Eva Bright Hart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09687599.2022.2034111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this article, we discuss our experiences on a project that is exploring gendered harms experienced by women during involuntary mental health treatment. We outline our journey towards a more complex understanding of our roles in the project, by considering the aspects of our identities that are hidden when situating ourselves only in terms of survivor or non-survivor researchers. In addition, we discuss expectations that are often present in research projects for survivor researchers to publicly disclose highly personal experiences, while non-survivor researchers face no such demands, and the myth of a homogenous survivor researcher identity. We discuss how critiquing binary identities, while still acknowledging power and difference, may open up new ideas about creative and strategic approaches to challenging and resisting psy-oppression.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability & Society\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"718 - 723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2034111\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2022.2034111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond binaries: complex roles and identities in critical mental health research
Abstract In this article, we discuss our experiences on a project that is exploring gendered harms experienced by women during involuntary mental health treatment. We outline our journey towards a more complex understanding of our roles in the project, by considering the aspects of our identities that are hidden when situating ourselves only in terms of survivor or non-survivor researchers. In addition, we discuss expectations that are often present in research projects for survivor researchers to publicly disclose highly personal experiences, while non-survivor researchers face no such demands, and the myth of a homogenous survivor researcher identity. We discuss how critiquing binary identities, while still acknowledging power and difference, may open up new ideas about creative and strategic approaches to challenging and resisting psy-oppression.