K-12计算机教育中的计算思维:适当的教学法

IF 3.4 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Technology Pedagogy and Education Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/1475939X.2023.2184857
Haya A. Alajlan, Reem Alebaikan, Ahmad Almassaad
{"title":"K-12计算机教育中的计算思维:适当的教学法","authors":"Haya A. Alajlan, Reem Alebaikan, Ahmad Almassaad","doi":"10.1080/1475939X.2023.2184857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study identified appropriate pedagogy for computational thinking in K–12 computer education. The Delphi technique was employed to collect different views, ideas and opinions derived a consensus from a panel of 12 international experts through a series of questionnaires. The experts have various experiences in computer science, computer education and computational thinking. After three rounds of survey, the expert panel identified a total of 13 appropriate teaching/learning strategies to develop computational thinking skills in K–12 computer education distributed among the nine skills of computational thinking: eight strategies derived from the 12 teaching and learning strategies in the first draft of the Delphi survey questionnaire and five strategies suggested and agreed by the panel. This study demonstrated the importance of finding an appropriate pedagogy for computational thinking with a focus on K–12 computer education.","PeriodicalId":46992,"journal":{"name":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"337 - 349"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational thinking in K–12 computer education: appropriate pedagogy\",\"authors\":\"Haya A. Alajlan, Reem Alebaikan, Ahmad Almassaad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1475939X.2023.2184857\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study identified appropriate pedagogy for computational thinking in K–12 computer education. The Delphi technique was employed to collect different views, ideas and opinions derived a consensus from a panel of 12 international experts through a series of questionnaires. The experts have various experiences in computer science, computer education and computational thinking. After three rounds of survey, the expert panel identified a total of 13 appropriate teaching/learning strategies to develop computational thinking skills in K–12 computer education distributed among the nine skills of computational thinking: eight strategies derived from the 12 teaching and learning strategies in the first draft of the Delphi survey questionnaire and five strategies suggested and agreed by the panel. This study demonstrated the importance of finding an appropriate pedagogy for computational thinking with a focus on K–12 computer education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology Pedagogy and Education\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"337 - 349\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology Pedagogy and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2023.2184857\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology Pedagogy and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2023.2184857","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究为K-12计算机教育中的计算思维确定了合适的教学法。采用德尔菲技术收集不同的观点,通过一系列问卷调查,从12名国际专家组成的小组中得出共识。专家们在计算机科学、计算机教育和计算思维方面有着丰富的经验。经过三轮调查,专家小组共确定了13种适当的教学/学习策略,以发展K-12计算机教育中的计算思维技能,分布在9种计算思维技能中:8种策略源自德尔福调查问卷初稿中的12种教学策略,5种策略由专家小组建议并同意。这项研究证明了为计算思维寻找合适的教学法的重要性,重点是K-12计算机教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Computational thinking in K–12 computer education: appropriate pedagogy
ABSTRACT This study identified appropriate pedagogy for computational thinking in K–12 computer education. The Delphi technique was employed to collect different views, ideas and opinions derived a consensus from a panel of 12 international experts through a series of questionnaires. The experts have various experiences in computer science, computer education and computational thinking. After three rounds of survey, the expert panel identified a total of 13 appropriate teaching/learning strategies to develop computational thinking skills in K–12 computer education distributed among the nine skills of computational thinking: eight strategies derived from the 12 teaching and learning strategies in the first draft of the Delphi survey questionnaire and five strategies suggested and agreed by the panel. This study demonstrated the importance of finding an appropriate pedagogy for computational thinking with a focus on K–12 computer education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Technology Pedagogy and Education
Technology Pedagogy and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Student teacher learning with Ozobots and Makey Makeys during a workshop and field experience Scripted synergy: elevating EFL writing and creativity through collaborative digital storytelling Unmasking the depoliticisation of ICT in digital competence frameworks for educators: a critical discourse study WhatsApp for pedagogy: initiatives, instructional practices and the nature of knowledge in Israel’s secondary education A testing load: a review of cognitive load in computer and paper-based learning and assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1