贝克特:《审查制度与戏仿问题》

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Estudios Irlandeses Pub Date : 2019-10-31 DOI:10.24162/ei2019-9186

Seán Kennedy

{"title":"贝克特:《审查制度与戏仿问题》","authors":"Seán Kennedy","doi":"10.24162/ei2019-9186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a forceful critique of previous scholarship, Lloyd (Meadhbh) Houston discerns evidence of “sectarian eugenicism” in Beckett’s writings. It is a startling claim, and there are problems to it. In particular, I suggest, Houston ignores the issue of tone: Beckett’s use of parody. Responding to Houston’s critique, I offer some thoughts on eugenicism, sectarianism and misogyny in Murphy and First Love. The aim is not to exculpate Beckett from all charges of prejudice, only to complicate issues of complicity in a theocratic hetero-patriarchal society.","PeriodicalId":53822,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Irlandeses","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beckett, Censorship and the Problem of Parody\",\"authors\":\"Seán Kennedy\",\"doi\":\"10.24162/ei2019-9186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a forceful critique of previous scholarship, Lloyd (Meadhbh) Houston discerns evidence of “sectarian eugenicism” in Beckett’s writings. It is a startling claim, and there are problems to it. In particular, I suggest, Houston ignores the issue of tone: Beckett’s use of parody. Responding to Houston’s critique, I offer some thoughts on eugenicism, sectarianism and misogyny in Murphy and First Love. The aim is not to exculpate Beckett from all charges of prejudice, only to complicate issues of complicity in a theocratic hetero-patriarchal society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios Irlandeses\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios Irlandeses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24162/ei2019-9186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Irlandeses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24162/ei2019-9186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在对之前的学术研究的有力批判中，劳埃德(梅德赫)休斯顿在贝克特的作品中发现了“宗派优生主义”的证据。这是一个令人吃惊的说法，其中存在问题。我认为，休斯敦特别忽略了语气的问题:贝克特对戏仿的使用。为了回应休斯顿的批评，我对墨菲和初恋中的优生学、宗派主义和厌女症提出了一些看法。其目的并不是为贝克特开脱偏见的所有指控，只是为了使神权异性恋男权社会中的共谋问题复杂化。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Beckett, Censorship and the Problem of Parody

In a forceful critique of previous scholarship, Lloyd (Meadhbh) Houston discerns evidence of “sectarian eugenicism” in Beckett’s writings. It is a startling claim, and there are problems to it. In particular, I suggest, Houston ignores the issue of tone: Beckett’s use of parody. Responding to Houston’s critique, I offer some thoughts on eugenicism, sectarianism and misogyny in Murphy and First Love. The aim is not to exculpate Beckett from all charges of prejudice, only to complicate issues of complicity in a theocratic hetero-patriarchal society.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊