重新审视一些被遗忘的关于儿童精神的观点

IF 1.2 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION International Journal of Childrens Spirituality Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1080/1364436X.2022.2136143
Tony Eaude
{"title":"重新审视一些被遗忘的关于儿童精神的观点","authors":"Tony Eaude","doi":"10.1080/1364436X.2022.2136143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article revisits various ideas from the literature on children’s spirituality which have elicited less attention in recent years, notably those of researchers who emphasise the contexts of children’s lives and those whose research uses children’s narratives. Key aspects meriting further investigation and research are suggested, especially the idea of the spirituality(ies) of societies, rather than only of individuals, and the importance of children’s agency and narratives. It is argued that spirituality should be seen as a process rather than a thing, or a set of practices; and that considerations of power, notably factors such as gender, race, class and age, are too rarely addressed. Some cautionary words about the current discourse in children’s spirituality and suggestions for how research should be conducted are presented, calling for a less individualised view with more emphasis on context and culture and on how the manifestations of children’s spirituality vary at different ages.","PeriodicalId":45218,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Childrens Spirituality","volume":"28 1","pages":"22 - 37"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting some half-forgotten ideas on children’s spirituality\",\"authors\":\"Tony Eaude\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1364436X.2022.2136143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article revisits various ideas from the literature on children’s spirituality which have elicited less attention in recent years, notably those of researchers who emphasise the contexts of children’s lives and those whose research uses children’s narratives. Key aspects meriting further investigation and research are suggested, especially the idea of the spirituality(ies) of societies, rather than only of individuals, and the importance of children’s agency and narratives. It is argued that spirituality should be seen as a process rather than a thing, or a set of practices; and that considerations of power, notably factors such as gender, race, class and age, are too rarely addressed. Some cautionary words about the current discourse in children’s spirituality and suggestions for how research should be conducted are presented, calling for a less individualised view with more emphasis on context and culture and on how the manifestations of children’s spirituality vary at different ages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Childrens Spirituality\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"22 - 37\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Childrens Spirituality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2022.2136143\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Childrens Spirituality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1364436X.2022.2136143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文回顾了近年来引起较少关注的关于儿童灵性的文献中的各种观点,特别是那些强调儿童生活背景的研究人员和那些使用儿童叙事的研究人员。提出了值得进一步调查和研究的关键方面,特别是社会而不仅仅是个人的精神观念,以及儿童的能动性和叙述的重要性。有人认为,灵性应该被视为一个过程,而不是一件事,或一套实践;而对权力的考虑,尤其是性别、种族、阶级和年龄等因素,很少被提及。对目前关于儿童灵性的论述提出了一些警告,并对如何进行研究提出了建议,呼吁减少个性化的观点,更多地强调背景和文化,以及不同年龄段儿童灵性的表现如何不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting some half-forgotten ideas on children’s spirituality
ABSTRACT This article revisits various ideas from the literature on children’s spirituality which have elicited less attention in recent years, notably those of researchers who emphasise the contexts of children’s lives and those whose research uses children’s narratives. Key aspects meriting further investigation and research are suggested, especially the idea of the spirituality(ies) of societies, rather than only of individuals, and the importance of children’s agency and narratives. It is argued that spirituality should be seen as a process rather than a thing, or a set of practices; and that considerations of power, notably factors such as gender, race, class and age, are too rarely addressed. Some cautionary words about the current discourse in children’s spirituality and suggestions for how research should be conducted are presented, calling for a less individualised view with more emphasis on context and culture and on how the manifestations of children’s spirituality vary at different ages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
53.80%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Religiosity, gender, and correlates of academic dishonesty among children: a Jordanian study The fluidity of Finnish youths’ Personal worldviews Validation study of the Early Childhood Educators’ Spiritual Practices in the Classroom (ECE-SPC) instrument using Rasch Supporting modern teaching in Islamic schools: pedagogical best practice for teachers Critical Reflection, Spirituality and Professional Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1