风险调节系统中的利用阈值

IF 3.1 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS American Journal of Health Economics Pub Date : 2023-03-17 DOI:10.1086/724791
Eran Politzer
{"title":"风险调节系统中的利用阈值","authors":"Eran Politzer","doi":"10.1086/724791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk adjustment systems, that reallocate funds among competing health insurers, often use risk adjustors that are based on utilization documented in medical claims. The level of utilization that triggers an adjustor, i.e. the utilization threshold, is frequently chosen implicitly and uniformly. I empirically study utilization thresholds in the setting of the U.S. Marketplaces. Simulat-ing alternative levels of thresholds for adjustors, I find thresholds that improve the prediction fit, by up to 9.6% in some disease groups. Using newly-defined measures for the incentives to game the system, I show that for some thresholds a tradeoff between fit and gaming-incentives does not exist. To guide a choice of multiple utilization thresholds, I employ a regression tree algorithm that considers both fit and gaming incentives.","PeriodicalId":45056,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization Thresholds in Risk Adjustment Systems\",\"authors\":\"Eran Politzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/724791\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Risk adjustment systems, that reallocate funds among competing health insurers, often use risk adjustors that are based on utilization documented in medical claims. The level of utilization that triggers an adjustor, i.e. the utilization threshold, is frequently chosen implicitly and uniformly. I empirically study utilization thresholds in the setting of the U.S. Marketplaces. Simulat-ing alternative levels of thresholds for adjustors, I find thresholds that improve the prediction fit, by up to 9.6% in some disease groups. Using newly-defined measures for the incentives to game the system, I show that for some thresholds a tradeoff between fit and gaming-incentives does not exist. To guide a choice of multiple utilization thresholds, I employ a regression tree algorithm that considers both fit and gaming incentives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/724791\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724791","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风险调整系统在相互竞争的医疗保险公司之间重新分配资金,通常使用基于医疗索赔中记录的使用情况的风险调整器。触发调节器的利用率水平,即利用率阈值,经常被隐式且一致地选择。我对美国市场设置中的利用率阈值进行了实证研究。模拟调整者的替代阈值水平,我发现在某些疾病组中,阈值可将预测结果提高9.6%。使用新定义的激励措施来与系统博弈,我发现对于某些阈值,不存在财务激励和博弈激励之间的权衡。为了指导选择多个利用率阈值,我采用了一种回归树算法,该算法同时考虑了财务和游戏激励。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utilization Thresholds in Risk Adjustment Systems
Risk adjustment systems, that reallocate funds among competing health insurers, often use risk adjustors that are based on utilization documented in medical claims. The level of utilization that triggers an adjustor, i.e. the utilization threshold, is frequently chosen implicitly and uniformly. I empirically study utilization thresholds in the setting of the U.S. Marketplaces. Simulat-ing alternative levels of thresholds for adjustors, I find thresholds that improve the prediction fit, by up to 9.6% in some disease groups. Using newly-defined measures for the incentives to game the system, I show that for some thresholds a tradeoff between fit and gaming-incentives does not exist. To guide a choice of multiple utilization thresholds, I employ a regression tree algorithm that considers both fit and gaming incentives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health Economics (AJHE) provides a forum for the in-depth analysis of health care markets and individual health behaviors. The articles appearing in AJHE are authored by scholars from universities, private research organizations, government, and industry. Subjects of interest include competition among private insurers, hospitals, and physicians; impacts of public insurance programs, including the Affordable Care Act; pharmaceutical innovation and regulation; medical device supply; the rise of obesity and its consequences; the influence and growth of aging populations; and much more.
期刊最新文献
The Effects of Post-Acute Care Payment Reform on Caregiving From Lawn Care to Home Care: Undocumented Immigration and Aging in Place Heterogeneous Effects of the Affordable Care Act on Emergency Department Visits and Payer Composition among Older Adults by Race and Ethnicity Increased Schooling Reduces Hospitalization Later in Life: New Evidence with Optimal Instruments from the United States Financial Risk and the Decision of Small Employers to Self-Fund Health Insurance: Evidence from Stop Loss Regulation in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1