房价和可负担性

IF 0.8 Q3 ECONOMICS New Zealand Economic Papers Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/00779954.2021.1878328
Ryan Greenaway‐McGrevy, P. Phillips
{"title":"房价和可负担性","authors":"Ryan Greenaway‐McGrevy, P. Phillips","doi":"10.1080/00779954.2021.1878328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The decade following the global financial crisis (GFC) has witnessed rampant house price appreciation in many cities of the developed world. The metropolitan centres of New Zealand showcase this phenomenon with house price appreciation persistently outpacing income growth. In Auckland, the ratio of prevailing median house prices to median household income rose from 6.4 in 2010 to 10.0 in 2016 (Demographia, 2011, 2017), before declining to 8.6 by 2019 as house prices flat-lined while household incomes increased (Demographia, 2020). However, a strong resurgence in house prices during 2020 means that this ratio has resumed its upward trajectory, with an increase of approximately 16% set against an increase in average household income of only 4.4% for the year through to June 2019 (Statistics New Zealand, 2020). Increases over the last decade of a similar or even larger magnitude have occurred in the cities of Tauranga, Hamilton, Napier, Wellington and Dunedin. A study by the authors (Greenaway-McGrevy & Phillips, 2016) analysed data for the main metropolitan centres over 2005–2016, finding strong evidence of repeated episodes of house price exuberance coupled with clear indications of spill-over effects among New Zealand cities. In response to these developments in the New Zealand housing market, an array of policy tools has been marshalled by the government and central bank designed to curb house price inflation. The measures have acted on both housing supply and demand but broadly have met with very limited success, as evidenced by the raw data in Figures 1 and 2. Empirical results from recursive econometric tests for speculative exuberance in theAuckland andWellingtonmarkets are shown in Figure 3. These recursive tests use the methods of Phillips, Shi, and Yu (2015a, 2015b) for detection and real-time dating of asset price bubbles, and indicate the presence of real estate bubble episodes in bothAuckland andWellington housingmarkets over the two periods 2004–2006 and 2015–2016.Moreover, the latest data for Auckland and Wellington suggest a renewal of explosive behaviour in these two real estate markets in the final quarter of 2020, confirming widespread anecdotal and media evidence in late 2020 of intensive demand pressure and resulting FOMO1 in real estate activity in New Zealand. In response to these recurrent developments over the last two decades, central government has recent sought to restrain housing demand by reducing foreign investment (through the Overseas Investment Bill) and by restricting investor speculation (through the Taxation (Bright Lines Test for Residential Land) Bill).2 In addition, macro-prudential policies by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand have sought to restrict access to credit through maximum load-to-value ratios (LVRs) that serve to cool down housing demand (Armstrong, Skilling, & Yao, 2019). These policies contributed to stabilizing house price appreciation for a few years after 2016, as evidenced in Figure 1. But these cooling measures have not led to noticeable reductions in house prices or improvements in affordability as measured by median price-to-income ratios. The latest data for 2020 indicate a renewal of rampant house price inflation that is contributing further to unaffordability.","PeriodicalId":38921,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Economic Papers","volume":"55 1","pages":"1 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00779954.2021.1878328","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"House prices and affordability\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Greenaway‐McGrevy, P. Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00779954.2021.1878328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The decade following the global financial crisis (GFC) has witnessed rampant house price appreciation in many cities of the developed world. The metropolitan centres of New Zealand showcase this phenomenon with house price appreciation persistently outpacing income growth. In Auckland, the ratio of prevailing median house prices to median household income rose from 6.4 in 2010 to 10.0 in 2016 (Demographia, 2011, 2017), before declining to 8.6 by 2019 as house prices flat-lined while household incomes increased (Demographia, 2020). However, a strong resurgence in house prices during 2020 means that this ratio has resumed its upward trajectory, with an increase of approximately 16% set against an increase in average household income of only 4.4% for the year through to June 2019 (Statistics New Zealand, 2020). Increases over the last decade of a similar or even larger magnitude have occurred in the cities of Tauranga, Hamilton, Napier, Wellington and Dunedin. A study by the authors (Greenaway-McGrevy & Phillips, 2016) analysed data for the main metropolitan centres over 2005–2016, finding strong evidence of repeated episodes of house price exuberance coupled with clear indications of spill-over effects among New Zealand cities. In response to these developments in the New Zealand housing market, an array of policy tools has been marshalled by the government and central bank designed to curb house price inflation. The measures have acted on both housing supply and demand but broadly have met with very limited success, as evidenced by the raw data in Figures 1 and 2. Empirical results from recursive econometric tests for speculative exuberance in theAuckland andWellingtonmarkets are shown in Figure 3. These recursive tests use the methods of Phillips, Shi, and Yu (2015a, 2015b) for detection and real-time dating of asset price bubbles, and indicate the presence of real estate bubble episodes in bothAuckland andWellington housingmarkets over the two periods 2004–2006 and 2015–2016.Moreover, the latest data for Auckland and Wellington suggest a renewal of explosive behaviour in these two real estate markets in the final quarter of 2020, confirming widespread anecdotal and media evidence in late 2020 of intensive demand pressure and resulting FOMO1 in real estate activity in New Zealand. In response to these recurrent developments over the last two decades, central government has recent sought to restrain housing demand by reducing foreign investment (through the Overseas Investment Bill) and by restricting investor speculation (through the Taxation (Bright Lines Test for Residential Land) Bill).2 In addition, macro-prudential policies by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand have sought to restrict access to credit through maximum load-to-value ratios (LVRs) that serve to cool down housing demand (Armstrong, Skilling, & Yao, 2019). These policies contributed to stabilizing house price appreciation for a few years after 2016, as evidenced in Figure 1. But these cooling measures have not led to noticeable reductions in house prices or improvements in affordability as measured by median price-to-income ratios. The latest data for 2020 indicate a renewal of rampant house price inflation that is contributing further to unaffordability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand Economic Papers\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00779954.2021.1878328\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand Economic Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2021.1878328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Economic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2021.1878328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

在全球金融危机之后的十年里,许多发达国家的城市见证了房价的疯狂上涨。新西兰的大都市中心体现了这一现象,房价涨幅持续超过收入增长。在奥克兰,现行房价中位数与家庭收入中位数之比从2010年的6.4上升到2016年的10.0 (Demographia, 2011年,2017年),然后到2019年下降到8.6,因为房价持平,而家庭收入增加(Demographia, 2020年)。然而,2020年房价的强劲反弹意味着这一比例已恢复上升轨迹,截至2019年6月,这一比例增长了约16%,而平均家庭收入仅增长了4.4%(新西兰统计局,2020年)。在过去十年中,陶朗加、汉密尔顿、纳皮尔、惠灵顿和达尼丁等城市的房价都出现了类似甚至更大的涨幅。作者(Greenaway-McGrevy & Phillips, 2016)的一项研究分析了2005-2016年主要大都市中心的数据,发现了房价反复上涨的有力证据,以及新西兰城市之间溢出效应的明确迹象。为了应对新西兰房地产市场的这些发展,政府和央行已经制定了一系列政策工具,旨在遏制房价上涨。这些措施对住房供应和需求都起了作用,但总体上收效甚微,如图1和图2中的原始数据所示。图3显示了奥克兰和惠灵顿市场投机繁荣的递归计量经济学检验的实证结果。这些递归检验使用Phillips、Shi和Yu (2015a, 2015b)的方法来检测和实时确定资产价格泡沫,并表明在2004-2006年和2015-2016年两个时期,奥克兰和惠灵顿住房市场都存在房地产泡沫事件。此外,奥克兰和惠灵顿的最新数据表明,2020年最后一个季度,这两个房地产市场的爆炸性行为将再次出现,这证实了2020年底普遍存在的轶事和媒体证据,即强烈的需求压力,并导致新西兰房地产活动出现FOMO1。为了应对过去二十年来这些经常性的发展,中央政府最近试图通过减少外国投资(通过海外投资法案)和限制投资者投机(通过税收(住宅用地明线测试)法案)来抑制住房需求此外,新西兰储备银行的宏观审慎政策试图通过最大负荷价值比(LVRs)来限制获得信贷的机会,这有助于冷却住房需求(Armstrong, Skilling, & Yao, 2019)。如图1所示,这些政策有助于在2016年之后的几年里稳定房价升值。但这些降温措施并没有导致房价明显下降,也没有改善以房价收入比中位数衡量的可负担性。2020年的最新数据表明,猖獗的房价通胀再次抬头,这进一步加剧了人们的负担能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
House prices and affordability
The decade following the global financial crisis (GFC) has witnessed rampant house price appreciation in many cities of the developed world. The metropolitan centres of New Zealand showcase this phenomenon with house price appreciation persistently outpacing income growth. In Auckland, the ratio of prevailing median house prices to median household income rose from 6.4 in 2010 to 10.0 in 2016 (Demographia, 2011, 2017), before declining to 8.6 by 2019 as house prices flat-lined while household incomes increased (Demographia, 2020). However, a strong resurgence in house prices during 2020 means that this ratio has resumed its upward trajectory, with an increase of approximately 16% set against an increase in average household income of only 4.4% for the year through to June 2019 (Statistics New Zealand, 2020). Increases over the last decade of a similar or even larger magnitude have occurred in the cities of Tauranga, Hamilton, Napier, Wellington and Dunedin. A study by the authors (Greenaway-McGrevy & Phillips, 2016) analysed data for the main metropolitan centres over 2005–2016, finding strong evidence of repeated episodes of house price exuberance coupled with clear indications of spill-over effects among New Zealand cities. In response to these developments in the New Zealand housing market, an array of policy tools has been marshalled by the government and central bank designed to curb house price inflation. The measures have acted on both housing supply and demand but broadly have met with very limited success, as evidenced by the raw data in Figures 1 and 2. Empirical results from recursive econometric tests for speculative exuberance in theAuckland andWellingtonmarkets are shown in Figure 3. These recursive tests use the methods of Phillips, Shi, and Yu (2015a, 2015b) for detection and real-time dating of asset price bubbles, and indicate the presence of real estate bubble episodes in bothAuckland andWellington housingmarkets over the two periods 2004–2006 and 2015–2016.Moreover, the latest data for Auckland and Wellington suggest a renewal of explosive behaviour in these two real estate markets in the final quarter of 2020, confirming widespread anecdotal and media evidence in late 2020 of intensive demand pressure and resulting FOMO1 in real estate activity in New Zealand. In response to these recurrent developments over the last two decades, central government has recent sought to restrain housing demand by reducing foreign investment (through the Overseas Investment Bill) and by restricting investor speculation (through the Taxation (Bright Lines Test for Residential Land) Bill).2 In addition, macro-prudential policies by the Reserve Bank of New Zealand have sought to restrict access to credit through maximum load-to-value ratios (LVRs) that serve to cool down housing demand (Armstrong, Skilling, & Yao, 2019). These policies contributed to stabilizing house price appreciation for a few years after 2016, as evidenced in Figure 1. But these cooling measures have not led to noticeable reductions in house prices or improvements in affordability as measured by median price-to-income ratios. The latest data for 2020 indicate a renewal of rampant house price inflation that is contributing further to unaffordability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Zealand Economic Papers
New Zealand Economic Papers Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Community-level ethnic diversity and community-level socio-economic development: evidence from 20 African countries The wage cost of a lack of access to affordable childcare in Aotearoa New Zealand Distinguished fellow lecture: monetary policy and the benefits and limits of central bank independence Differences between NZ and U.S. individual investor sentiment: more noise or more information? Citation for Bob Buckle to mark his Distinguished Fellow Award
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1