“修补漏洞”:利用教育工作者的内部知识倡导包容性实践

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Equity & Excellence in Education Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/10665684.2021.2021656
Carrie E. Rood
{"title":"“修补漏洞”:利用教育工作者的内部知识倡导包容性实践","authors":"Carrie E. Rood","doi":"10.1080/10665684.2021.2021656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this article, I highlight resistance methods that teachers who identified as having disability studies in education and social justice identities used to uphold ideological commitments to these identities. I specifically focus on the teachers’ leverage of the tactic of “working the cracks” to actively reframe disability outside of deficit-based frameworks with colleagues and in support of families. As Collins described, individuals working in bureaucratic systems (e.g., public schools) must use the cracks of the system, or insider knowledge, to find the spaces and fissures that they can work through and expand on. Educators used the cracks of the systems of special education to advocate alongside and for the inclusion of students with disabilities.","PeriodicalId":47334,"journal":{"name":"Equity & Excellence in Education","volume":"54 1","pages":"426 - 439"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Working the Cracks”: Leveraging Educators’ Insider Knowledge to Advocate for Inclusive Practices\",\"authors\":\"Carrie E. Rood\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10665684.2021.2021656\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this article, I highlight resistance methods that teachers who identified as having disability studies in education and social justice identities used to uphold ideological commitments to these identities. I specifically focus on the teachers’ leverage of the tactic of “working the cracks” to actively reframe disability outside of deficit-based frameworks with colleagues and in support of families. As Collins described, individuals working in bureaucratic systems (e.g., public schools) must use the cracks of the system, or insider knowledge, to find the spaces and fissures that they can work through and expand on. Educators used the cracks of the systems of special education to advocate alongside and for the inclusion of students with disabilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Equity & Excellence in Education\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"426 - 439\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Equity & Excellence in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2021.2021656\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Equity & Excellence in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2021.2021656","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要在这篇文章中,我强调了在教育和社会正义身份中被认定为有残疾研究的教师用来维护对这些身份的意识形态承诺的抵制方法。我特别关注的是教师们利用“破解裂缝”的策略,在与同事的基于赤字的框架之外,积极重塑残疾问题,并支持家庭。正如柯林斯所描述的,在官僚系统(如公立学校)工作的个人必须利用系统的裂缝或内部知识,找到他们可以克服和扩展的空间和裂缝。教育工作者利用特殊教育系统的裂缝,与残疾学生一起倡导并支持他们的融入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“Working the Cracks”: Leveraging Educators’ Insider Knowledge to Advocate for Inclusive Practices
ABSTRACT In this article, I highlight resistance methods that teachers who identified as having disability studies in education and social justice identities used to uphold ideological commitments to these identities. I specifically focus on the teachers’ leverage of the tactic of “working the cracks” to actively reframe disability outside of deficit-based frameworks with colleagues and in support of families. As Collins described, individuals working in bureaucratic systems (e.g., public schools) must use the cracks of the system, or insider knowledge, to find the spaces and fissures that they can work through and expand on. Educators used the cracks of the systems of special education to advocate alongside and for the inclusion of students with disabilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Equity & Excellence in Education
Equity & Excellence in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
23.10%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Equity & Excellence in Education publishes articles based on scholarly research utilizing qualitative or quantitative methods, as well as essays that describe and assess practical efforts to achieve educational equity and are contextualized within an appropriate literature review. We consider manuscripts on a range of topics related to equity, equality and social justice in K-12 or postsecondary schooling, and that focus upon social justice issues in school systems, individual schools, classrooms, and/or the social justice factors that contribute to inequality in learning for students from diverse social group backgrounds. There have been and will continue to be many social justice efforts to transform educational systems as well as interpersonal interactions at all levels of schooling.
期刊最新文献
Imagining Disability Justice in Arts Education: Loving Critiques and Pathways Forward Chismosas Against White Hetero-patriarchy: Chisme as a Literacy Pedagogy of Resistant Girlhood/Womanhood FOR THE CULTURE We are transformers: on being black, women, and pedagogues Freedom Moves: Theorizing Hip Hop as Black Liberatory Practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1