重新考虑非洲修正原则中的团结

A. K. Fayemi
{"title":"重新考虑非洲修正原则中的团结","authors":"A. K. Fayemi","doi":"10.7196/SAJBL.2021.V14I2.00744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Principlism has attracted severe criticisms in contemporary bioethical scholarship. Scholars working in bioethics in the sub-Sahara have challenged the autonomy component of principlism, with strong emphasis on solidarity as a more fundamental principle that ought to guide bioethical discourses and practices in Africa and beyond. Focusing on Kevin Gary Behrens, who defends an indigenous Africaninspired version of principlism that incorporates salient African moral values including community, relationality, harmony and solidarity, this article questions the nebulous conception of solidarity in Behrens’ African modified principlism (AMP). AMP is anchored in the principles of respect for persons, beneficence, non-maleficence and harmony. Contra Behrens, I argue that the attempt to replace the American principlist model ‘with a new African-inspired principlist mantra’ can only succeed when there is a thorough analysis of the nature and boundaries of solidarity, which is currently lacking. Advancing on Thaddeus Metz’s construction of solidarity in his ‘Afro-bioethic of communion’, I defend a metaphoric normative conception of solidarity that represents historical symbols of the self and the other in a reflexive-care matrix of identification, recognition, inclusion and empathy. Beyond the partialist frame grounding the understanding of solidarity in African bioethical thought, which is inadequate, I offer a metaphoric, sympathetic and unbound space of solidarity. Suggested for future research is investigating the ranging implications of a metaphoric normative understanding of solidarity for dealing with vulnerable and non-vulnerable groups in the context of healthcare and environmental bioethics at the local, regional and global levels.","PeriodicalId":43498,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","volume":"14 1","pages":"50-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconsidering solidarity in an African modified principlism\",\"authors\":\"A. K. Fayemi\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAJBL.2021.V14I2.00744\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Principlism has attracted severe criticisms in contemporary bioethical scholarship. Scholars working in bioethics in the sub-Sahara have challenged the autonomy component of principlism, with strong emphasis on solidarity as a more fundamental principle that ought to guide bioethical discourses and practices in Africa and beyond. Focusing on Kevin Gary Behrens, who defends an indigenous Africaninspired version of principlism that incorporates salient African moral values including community, relationality, harmony and solidarity, this article questions the nebulous conception of solidarity in Behrens’ African modified principlism (AMP). AMP is anchored in the principles of respect for persons, beneficence, non-maleficence and harmony. Contra Behrens, I argue that the attempt to replace the American principlist model ‘with a new African-inspired principlist mantra’ can only succeed when there is a thorough analysis of the nature and boundaries of solidarity, which is currently lacking. Advancing on Thaddeus Metz’s construction of solidarity in his ‘Afro-bioethic of communion’, I defend a metaphoric normative conception of solidarity that represents historical symbols of the self and the other in a reflexive-care matrix of identification, recognition, inclusion and empathy. Beyond the partialist frame grounding the understanding of solidarity in African bioethical thought, which is inadequate, I offer a metaphoric, sympathetic and unbound space of solidarity. Suggested for future research is investigating the ranging implications of a metaphoric normative understanding of solidarity for dealing with vulnerable and non-vulnerable groups in the context of healthcare and environmental bioethics at the local, regional and global levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"50-54\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2021.V14I2.00744\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Bioethics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJBL.2021.V14I2.00744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

原则主义在当代生物伦理学学术中受到了严厉的批评。撒哈拉以南地区从事生物伦理学研究的学者对原则主义的自治部分提出了挑战,他们强烈强调团结是一项更基本的原则,应该指导非洲及其他地区的生物伦理学论述和实践。凯文·加里·贝伦斯(Kevin Gary Behrens)为一种非洲本土启发的原则主义辩护,这种原则主义融合了突出的非洲道德价值观,包括社区、关系、和谐和团结。本文对贝伦斯的非洲修正原则主义(AMP)中模糊的团结概念提出了质疑。AMP以尊重人、仁慈、无害和和谐的原则为基础。与贝伦斯相反,我认为,只有对团结的性质和边界进行彻底的分析,才能成功地“用一种新的非洲原则主义咒语”取代美国原则主义模式,而这正是目前所缺乏的。在梅茨(Thaddeus Metz)的《非洲生物伦理的共融》(african - bioethics of communion)中对团结的构建的基础上,我为团结的隐喻性规范概念辩护,该概念代表了自我和他人在认同、认可、包容和共情的反身性关怀矩阵中的历史符号。在对非洲生物伦理思想中团结的理解的片面框架之外,这是不充分的,我提供了一个隐喻性的,同情的和不受约束的团结空间。建议未来的研究是调查在地方、区域和全球各级的卫生保健和环境生物伦理背景下,对团结的隐喻性规范理解对处理弱势群体和非弱势群体的广泛影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reconsidering solidarity in an African modified principlism
Principlism has attracted severe criticisms in contemporary bioethical scholarship. Scholars working in bioethics in the sub-Sahara have challenged the autonomy component of principlism, with strong emphasis on solidarity as a more fundamental principle that ought to guide bioethical discourses and practices in Africa and beyond. Focusing on Kevin Gary Behrens, who defends an indigenous Africaninspired version of principlism that incorporates salient African moral values including community, relationality, harmony and solidarity, this article questions the nebulous conception of solidarity in Behrens’ African modified principlism (AMP). AMP is anchored in the principles of respect for persons, beneficence, non-maleficence and harmony. Contra Behrens, I argue that the attempt to replace the American principlist model ‘with a new African-inspired principlist mantra’ can only succeed when there is a thorough analysis of the nature and boundaries of solidarity, which is currently lacking. Advancing on Thaddeus Metz’s construction of solidarity in his ‘Afro-bioethic of communion’, I defend a metaphoric normative conception of solidarity that represents historical symbols of the self and the other in a reflexive-care matrix of identification, recognition, inclusion and empathy. Beyond the partialist frame grounding the understanding of solidarity in African bioethical thought, which is inadequate, I offer a metaphoric, sympathetic and unbound space of solidarity. Suggested for future research is investigating the ranging implications of a metaphoric normative understanding of solidarity for dealing with vulnerable and non-vulnerable groups in the context of healthcare and environmental bioethics at the local, regional and global levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
18
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Pragmatic ethical approaches to evangelising in the medical encounter The situation in Gaza – will cruelty and hatred triumph? Gaza and international law: The global obligation to protect life and health Is there a legal and ethical duty on doctors to inform patients of the likely co-payment costs should they be treated by practitioners who have contracted out of medical scheme rates? Three to one – an ethicolegal outline of mitochondrial donation in the South African context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1