sonAIR飞机噪声仿真模型的验证

IF 1.7 Q2 ACOUSTICS Noise Mapping Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1515/noise-2021-0007
D. Jäger, Christoph Zellmann, Felix Schlatter, J. Wunderli
{"title":"sonAIR飞机噪声仿真模型的验证","authors":"D. Jäger, Christoph Zellmann, Felix Schlatter, J. Wunderli","doi":"10.1515/noise-2021-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract sonAIR is a recently developed aircraft noise simulation model designed for single flight simulation while still being applicable for calculation of entire airport scenarios. This paper presents a rigorous validation exercise, wherein roughly 20’000 single flights were simulated using the 22 currently available sonAIR emission models of turbofan aircraft and compared against noise measurements. The measurements were recorded with the noise monitoring terminals at Zurich and Geneva airport, Switzerland, and with additional microphones installed by the author’s institution. Data from 22 measurement positions were analyzed, covering all departure and approach routes at distances from 1.8 to 53 kilometers from the airports. sonAIR was found to be accurate for departures and approaches under different operating conditions and aircraft configuration. The mean overall differences between simulation and measurements were well below ±1 dB in terms of noise event levels, with standard deviations of ±1.7 dB respectively ±2.4 dB, depending on the model type. A few aircraft types that displayed larger deviations are discussed individually. A sensitivity analysis on the input data found the quality and level of detail of the land cover data to be critical for the simulation accuracy. Changes in other input data such as atmospheric profiles and buildings had non-significant impacts.","PeriodicalId":44086,"journal":{"name":"Noise Mapping","volume":"8 1","pages":"95 - 107"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/noise-2021-0007","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of the sonAIR aircraft noise simulation model\",\"authors\":\"D. Jäger, Christoph Zellmann, Felix Schlatter, J. Wunderli\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/noise-2021-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract sonAIR is a recently developed aircraft noise simulation model designed for single flight simulation while still being applicable for calculation of entire airport scenarios. This paper presents a rigorous validation exercise, wherein roughly 20’000 single flights were simulated using the 22 currently available sonAIR emission models of turbofan aircraft and compared against noise measurements. The measurements were recorded with the noise monitoring terminals at Zurich and Geneva airport, Switzerland, and with additional microphones installed by the author’s institution. Data from 22 measurement positions were analyzed, covering all departure and approach routes at distances from 1.8 to 53 kilometers from the airports. sonAIR was found to be accurate for departures and approaches under different operating conditions and aircraft configuration. The mean overall differences between simulation and measurements were well below ±1 dB in terms of noise event levels, with standard deviations of ±1.7 dB respectively ±2.4 dB, depending on the model type. A few aircraft types that displayed larger deviations are discussed individually. A sensitivity analysis on the input data found the quality and level of detail of the land cover data to be critical for the simulation accuracy. Changes in other input data such as atmospheric profiles and buildings had non-significant impacts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Noise Mapping\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"95 - 107\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1515/noise-2021-0007\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Noise Mapping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2021-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noise Mapping","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/noise-2021-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

摘要sonAIR是最近开发的一种飞机噪声模拟模型,设计用于单次飞行模拟,但仍适用于整个机场场景的计算。本文提出了一项严格的验证工作,其中使用22个目前可用的涡扇飞机sonAIR排放模型模拟了大约20’000次单次飞行,并与噪声测量结果进行了比较。测量结果是用瑞士苏黎世和日内瓦机场的噪音监测终端以及提交人所在机构安装的额外麦克风记录的。分析了22个测量位置的数据,涵盖了距离机场1.8至53公里的所有出发和进近路线。sonAIR被发现在不同的操作条件和飞机配置下对起飞和进近是准确的。就噪声事件水平而言,模拟和测量之间的平均总体差异远低于±1 dB,标准偏差分别为±1.7 dB和±2.4 dB,具体取决于模型类型。对显示较大偏差的几种机型分别进行了讨论。对输入数据的敏感性分析发现,土地覆盖数据的质量和详细程度对模拟精度至关重要。大气剖面和建筑物等其他输入数据的变化没有产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of the sonAIR aircraft noise simulation model
Abstract sonAIR is a recently developed aircraft noise simulation model designed for single flight simulation while still being applicable for calculation of entire airport scenarios. This paper presents a rigorous validation exercise, wherein roughly 20’000 single flights were simulated using the 22 currently available sonAIR emission models of turbofan aircraft and compared against noise measurements. The measurements were recorded with the noise monitoring terminals at Zurich and Geneva airport, Switzerland, and with additional microphones installed by the author’s institution. Data from 22 measurement positions were analyzed, covering all departure and approach routes at distances from 1.8 to 53 kilometers from the airports. sonAIR was found to be accurate for departures and approaches under different operating conditions and aircraft configuration. The mean overall differences between simulation and measurements were well below ±1 dB in terms of noise event levels, with standard deviations of ±1.7 dB respectively ±2.4 dB, depending on the model type. A few aircraft types that displayed larger deviations are discussed individually. A sensitivity analysis on the input data found the quality and level of detail of the land cover data to be critical for the simulation accuracy. Changes in other input data such as atmospheric profiles and buildings had non-significant impacts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Noise Mapping
Noise Mapping ACOUSTICS-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
5
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ever since its inception, Noise Mapping has been offering fast and comprehensive peer-review, while featuring prominent researchers among its Advisory Board. As a result, the journal is set to acquire a growing reputation as the main publication in the field of noise mapping, thus leading to a significant Impact Factor. The journal aims to promote and disseminate knowledge on noise mapping through the publication of high quality peer-reviewed papers focusing on the following aspects: noise mapping and noise action plans: case studies; models and algorithms for source characterization and outdoor sound propagation: proposals, applications, comparisons, round robin tests; local, national and international policies and good practices for noise mapping, planning, management and control; evaluation of noise mitigation actions; evaluation of environmental noise exposure; actions and communications to increase public awareness of environmental noise issues; outdoor soundscape studies and mapping; classification, evaluation and preservation of quiet areas.
期刊最新文献
Three-dimensional visualisation of traffic noise based on the Henk de-Klujijver model Noise pollution and associated health impacts at Ganeshpeth Bus Terminus in Nagpur, India Reliability of smart noise pollution map Statistical modeling of traffic noise at intersections in a mid-sized city, India Case study on the audibility of siren-driven alert systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1