承诺官员能力、内部控制系统质量、利益冲突和服务欺诈

Erfan Agusfiandifutra, A. Akram, Endar Pituringsih
{"title":"承诺官员能力、内部控制系统质量、利益冲突和服务欺诈","authors":"Erfan Agusfiandifutra, A. Akram, Endar Pituringsih","doi":"10.24843/eja.2023.v33.i05.p17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to examine the influence of Commitment Making Officer Competency (PPK), Quality of Internal Control System (SPI) and Conflict of Interest on Goods & Services Procurement Fraud (PBJ) with Performance Accountability as moderator. The research was conducted at 40 regional apparatus organizations of the NTB provincial government with a sample of 107 respondents. Hypothesis testing uses a multiple linear regression model, namely Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The test results show that PPK Competence and SPI Quality have a negative effect on PBJ Fraud while Conflict of Interest has no effect on PBJ Fraud. This study found that PPK competence strengthens and SPI quality weakens the effect of Performance Accountability on PBJ Fraud, but Conflict of Interest has no effect on PBJ fraud which is moderated by Performance Accountability. \nKeywords: Fraud in Procurement of Goods/Services, Commitment Making Officers (PPK), Internal Control System (SPI), Conflicts of Interest, Performance Accountability","PeriodicalId":31177,"journal":{"name":"EJurnal Akuntansi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kompetensi Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen, Kualitas Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Konflik Kepentingan dan Fraud Pengadaan Barang atau Jasa\",\"authors\":\"Erfan Agusfiandifutra, A. Akram, Endar Pituringsih\",\"doi\":\"10.24843/eja.2023.v33.i05.p17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this research is to examine the influence of Commitment Making Officer Competency (PPK), Quality of Internal Control System (SPI) and Conflict of Interest on Goods & Services Procurement Fraud (PBJ) with Performance Accountability as moderator. The research was conducted at 40 regional apparatus organizations of the NTB provincial government with a sample of 107 respondents. Hypothesis testing uses a multiple linear regression model, namely Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The test results show that PPK Competence and SPI Quality have a negative effect on PBJ Fraud while Conflict of Interest has no effect on PBJ Fraud. This study found that PPK competence strengthens and SPI quality weakens the effect of Performance Accountability on PBJ Fraud, but Conflict of Interest has no effect on PBJ fraud which is moderated by Performance Accountability. \\nKeywords: Fraud in Procurement of Goods/Services, Commitment Making Officers (PPK), Internal Control System (SPI), Conflicts of Interest, Performance Accountability\",\"PeriodicalId\":31177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJurnal Akuntansi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJurnal Akuntansi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2023.v33.i05.p17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJurnal Akuntansi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2023.v33.i05.p17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是以绩效问责为调节因子,考察承诺官员能力(PPK)、内部控制系统质量(SPI)和利益冲突对商品和服务采购欺诈(PBJ)的影响。这项研究在NTB省政府的40个地区机构进行,样本为107名受访者。假设检验采用多元线性回归模型,即适度回归分析(MRA)。测试结果表明,PPK能力和SPI质量对PBJ欺诈有负面影响,而利益冲突对PBJ诈骗没有影响。本研究发现,PPK能力增强,SPI质量减弱了绩效问责制对PBJ欺诈的影响,但利益冲突对PBJ诈骗没有影响,而绩效问责制对其有调节作用。关键词:商品/服务采购欺诈、承诺官员、内部控制系统、利益冲突、绩效责任
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kompetensi Pejabat Pembuat Komitmen, Kualitas Sistem Pengendalian Internal, Konflik Kepentingan dan Fraud Pengadaan Barang atau Jasa
The aim of this research is to examine the influence of Commitment Making Officer Competency (PPK), Quality of Internal Control System (SPI) and Conflict of Interest on Goods & Services Procurement Fraud (PBJ) with Performance Accountability as moderator. The research was conducted at 40 regional apparatus organizations of the NTB provincial government with a sample of 107 respondents. Hypothesis testing uses a multiple linear regression model, namely Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA). The test results show that PPK Competence and SPI Quality have a negative effect on PBJ Fraud while Conflict of Interest has no effect on PBJ Fraud. This study found that PPK competence strengthens and SPI quality weakens the effect of Performance Accountability on PBJ Fraud, but Conflict of Interest has no effect on PBJ fraud which is moderated by Performance Accountability. Keywords: Fraud in Procurement of Goods/Services, Commitment Making Officers (PPK), Internal Control System (SPI), Conflicts of Interest, Performance Accountability
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Teori Sinyal Dalam Anomali Window Dressing 2022 Dan Penurunan Risiko Kredit Macet Pada Subsektor Perbankan: Studi Kasus Isu Resesi 2023 Restrukturisasi Kredit dan Kecukupan Modal: Apakah Mempengaruhi Likuiditas? Minat Mahasiswa Menjadi dan Tidak Menjadi Akuntan Publik Pemahaman Peraturan Perpajakan, Tingkat Penghasilan, Sanksi Pajak dan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi Analisis Struktur Modal Perusahaan Rokok yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1