妇女对1993年1月波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那战争停火的控制失败。

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY Istorija 20. veka Pub Date : 2021-08-01 DOI:10.29362/ist20veka.2021.2.pet.435-460
Vladimir Petrović
{"title":"妇女对1993年1月波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那战争停火的控制失败。","authors":"Vladimir Petrović","doi":"10.29362/ist20veka.2021.2.pet.435-460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia was created in London in August of 1992 as an instrument for the negotiations conducted by the United Nations and the European Community, represented by Cyrus Vance and Lord David Owen. Until the end of the year, they developed a detailed proposal to settle the Bosnian conflict, known as the Vance-Owen Peace Plan (VOPP). The VOPP was presented to the leaders of the warring factions in Geneva during the first session of talks in January of 1993. On the basis of archive material, judicial records, published documents, and memoirs of the participants, this article aims to reconstruct the dramatic negotiation process, which consisted of several rounds. An analysis of the declared Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian positions during the negotiations, as well as the interactions among the delegations and relations within them, reveals that all the parties were had been deeply engaged in double dealing. The Croatian side was seemingly ready to sign the VOPP but was undermining it by launching a conflict in the field at the same time. The Serbian side was escalating as well, the Bosnian Serb leaders were not ready to accept the plan, despite the suggestions they had received from Belgrade. Sarajevo was procrastinating, hoping for a direct US involvement in the crisis following the inauguration of the new Clinton Administration. That administration did undermine the plan, which damaged the credibility of the international negotiators. In such circumstances, the plan had slim chances of succeeding. Although a ceasefire would have shortened the Bosnian war by almost three years and cut human losses by at least half, the main negotiators found a compromise solution to be unacceptable. As they defined and propagated maximalist goals, acceptance of a compromise was both damaging their grip on power and defying their worldview.","PeriodicalId":14520,"journal":{"name":"Istorija 20. veka","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NEUSPEH ŽENEVSKIH PREGOVORA O PREKIDU RATA U BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI JANUARA 1993.\",\"authors\":\"Vladimir Petrović\",\"doi\":\"10.29362/ist20veka.2021.2.pet.435-460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia was created in London in August of 1992 as an instrument for the negotiations conducted by the United Nations and the European Community, represented by Cyrus Vance and Lord David Owen. Until the end of the year, they developed a detailed proposal to settle the Bosnian conflict, known as the Vance-Owen Peace Plan (VOPP). The VOPP was presented to the leaders of the warring factions in Geneva during the first session of talks in January of 1993. On the basis of archive material, judicial records, published documents, and memoirs of the participants, this article aims to reconstruct the dramatic negotiation process, which consisted of several rounds. An analysis of the declared Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian positions during the negotiations, as well as the interactions among the delegations and relations within them, reveals that all the parties were had been deeply engaged in double dealing. The Croatian side was seemingly ready to sign the VOPP but was undermining it by launching a conflict in the field at the same time. The Serbian side was escalating as well, the Bosnian Serb leaders were not ready to accept the plan, despite the suggestions they had received from Belgrade. Sarajevo was procrastinating, hoping for a direct US involvement in the crisis following the inauguration of the new Clinton Administration. That administration did undermine the plan, which damaged the credibility of the international negotiators. In such circumstances, the plan had slim chances of succeeding. Although a ceasefire would have shortened the Bosnian war by almost three years and cut human losses by at least half, the main negotiators found a compromise solution to be unacceptable. As they defined and propagated maximalist goals, acceptance of a compromise was both damaging their grip on power and defying their worldview.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Istorija 20. veka\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Istorija 20. veka\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29362/ist20veka.2021.2.pet.435-460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Istorija 20. veka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29362/ist20veka.2021.2.pet.435-460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

前南斯拉夫问题国际会议是1992年8月在伦敦设立的,作为以赛勒斯·万斯和大卫·欧文勋爵为代表的联合国和欧洲共同体进行谈判的一个工具。直到年底,他们制定了一项解决波斯尼亚冲突的详细建议,称为万斯-欧文和平计划。1993年1月在日内瓦举行的第一届会谈期间,向交战各派领导人提出了和平方案。本文以档案资料、司法记录、公开文件和参与者的回忆录为基础,试图重构这一历经多轮戏剧性谈判的过程。对谈判期间宣布的波斯尼亚、塞尔维亚和克罗地亚的立场以及各代表团之间的相互作用和各代表团内部的关系进行的分析表明,所有各方都深深从事双重交易。克罗地亚一方似乎准备签署《自愿退出协议》,但同时在实地发动冲突,破坏了该协议。塞尔维亚方面也在升级,波斯尼亚塞族领导人不准备接受该计划,尽管他们从贝尔格莱德收到了建议。萨拉热窝一直在拖延,希望在克林顿新政府就职后,美国能直接介入这场危机。奥巴马政府确实破坏了该计划,损害了国际谈判代表的信誉。在这种情况下,这个计划成功的可能性很小。尽管停火将使波斯尼亚战争缩短近三年,并使人员伤亡至少减少一半,但主要谈判代表发现妥协解决方案是不可接受的。当他们定义和宣传最大化目标时,接受妥协既损害了他们对权力的控制,也违背了他们的世界观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
NEUSPEH ŽENEVSKIH PREGOVORA O PREKIDU RATA U BOSNI I HERCEGOVINI JANUARA 1993.
The International Conference on the Former Yugoslavia was created in London in August of 1992 as an instrument for the negotiations conducted by the United Nations and the European Community, represented by Cyrus Vance and Lord David Owen. Until the end of the year, they developed a detailed proposal to settle the Bosnian conflict, known as the Vance-Owen Peace Plan (VOPP). The VOPP was presented to the leaders of the warring factions in Geneva during the first session of talks in January of 1993. On the basis of archive material, judicial records, published documents, and memoirs of the participants, this article aims to reconstruct the dramatic negotiation process, which consisted of several rounds. An analysis of the declared Bosnian, Serbian, and Croatian positions during the negotiations, as well as the interactions among the delegations and relations within them, reveals that all the parties were had been deeply engaged in double dealing. The Croatian side was seemingly ready to sign the VOPP but was undermining it by launching a conflict in the field at the same time. The Serbian side was escalating as well, the Bosnian Serb leaders were not ready to accept the plan, despite the suggestions they had received from Belgrade. Sarajevo was procrastinating, hoping for a direct US involvement in the crisis following the inauguration of the new Clinton Administration. That administration did undermine the plan, which damaged the credibility of the international negotiators. In such circumstances, the plan had slim chances of succeeding. Although a ceasefire would have shortened the Bosnian war by almost three years and cut human losses by at least half, the main negotiators found a compromise solution to be unacceptable. As they defined and propagated maximalist goals, acceptance of a compromise was both damaging their grip on power and defying their worldview.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Istorija 20. veka
Istorija 20. veka Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
ИМЕНИЯ ВЕЛИКОГО КНЯЗЯ МИХАИЛА АЛЕКСАНДРОВИЧА. ЛИЦА И СУДЬБЫ. СЕРБСКИЙ СЛЕД SVETSKA, TRANSNACIONALNA I GLOBALNA ISTORIJA – ISTORIOGRAFIJA ZA UMREŽENA DRUŠTVA 21. STOLEĆA? REGIONALNA PISMENOST U JUGOSLAVIJI SA POSEBNIM OSVRTOM NA CRNU GORU ČETRDESET GODINA ČASOPISA „ISTORIJA 20. VEKA“ 1983‒2023. PRINC ĐORĐE KARAĐORĐEVIĆ U OKUPIRANOJ SRBIJI 1941–1944.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1