在与非人类的对话中，或者在细胞的话语中，女性是如何沉默的

IF 0.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language and Dialogue Pub Date : 2022-03-22 DOI:10.1075/ld.00119.pra

E. Prażmo

{"title":"在与非人类的对话中，或者在细胞的话语中，女性是如何沉默的","authors":"E. Prażmo","doi":"10.1075/ld.00119.pra","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Dialogue plays a most important role in interpersonal relations creating and strengthening social cohesion.\n Conversely, the lack of dialogue – and more tellingly a deliberate resistance to it – leads to social friction and animosity. In\n this paper I focus on a strategy used to intentionally disable a possibility of a meaningful dialogue and to deny any voice to the\n “other”. Dehumanising the “other” by linguistically representing them as animals or machines exempts the perpetrator from any\n obligation towards the “other”, including the obligation to respect their rights. I adopt Haslam’s model of dehumanisation (2006) which shows how, by means of metaphorical language, women are dehumanised and\n denied the possibility to participate in a meaningful dialogue in the so called manosphere.","PeriodicalId":42318,"journal":{"name":"Language and Dialogue","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In dialogue with non-humans or how women are silenced in incels’ discourse\",\"authors\":\"E. Prażmo\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ld.00119.pra\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Dialogue plays a most important role in interpersonal relations creating and strengthening social cohesion.\\n Conversely, the lack of dialogue – and more tellingly a deliberate resistance to it – leads to social friction and animosity. In\\n this paper I focus on a strategy used to intentionally disable a possibility of a meaningful dialogue and to deny any voice to the\\n “other”. Dehumanising the “other” by linguistically representing them as animals or machines exempts the perpetrator from any\\n obligation towards the “other”, including the obligation to respect their rights. I adopt Haslam’s model of dehumanisation (2006) which shows how, by means of metaphorical language, women are dehumanised and\\n denied the possibility to participate in a meaningful dialogue in the so called manosphere.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00119.pra\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00119.pra","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

对话在人际关系、创造和加强社会凝聚力方面发挥着最重要的作用。相反，缺乏对话——更明显的是刻意抵制对话——会导致社会摩擦和敌意。在本文中，我关注的是一种策略，这种策略用于故意禁用有意义的对话的可能性，并拒绝向“他者”发出任何声音。通过在语言上将“他者”描绘成动物或机器而使其失去人性，行为人可以免除对“他者”的任何义务，包括尊重其权利的义务。我采用哈斯拉姆(Haslam)的非人性化模型(2006年)，该模型展示了通过隐喻语言，女性如何被非人性化，并被剥夺了在所谓的“庄园”中参与有意义对话的可能性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

In dialogue with non-humans or how women are silenced in incels’ discourse

Dialogue plays a most important role in interpersonal relations creating and strengthening social cohesion. Conversely, the lack of dialogue – and more tellingly a deliberate resistance to it – leads to social friction and animosity. In this paper I focus on a strategy used to intentionally disable a possibility of a meaningful dialogue and to deny any voice to the “other”. Dehumanising the “other” by linguistically representing them as animals or machines exempts the perpetrator from any obligation towards the “other”, including the obligation to respect their rights. I adopt Haslam’s model of dehumanisation (2006) which shows how, by means of metaphorical language, women are dehumanised and denied the possibility to participate in a meaningful dialogue in the so called manosphere.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Language and Dialogue LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： In our post-Cartesian times human abilities are regarded as integrated and interacting abilities. Speaking, thinking, perceiving, having emotions need to be studied in interaction. Integration and interaction take place in dialogue. Scholars are called upon to go beyond reductive methods of abstraction and division and to take up the challenge of coming to terms with the complex whole. The conclusions drawn from reasoning about human behaviour in the humanities and social sciences have finally been proven by experiments in the natural sciences, especially neurology and sociobiology. What happens in the black box, can now, at least in part, be made visible. The journal intends to be an explicitly interdisciplinary journal reaching out to any discipline dealing with human abilities on the basis of consilience or the unity of knowledge. It is the challenge of post-Cartesian science to tackle the issue of how body, mind and language are interconnected and dialogically put to action. The journal invites papers which deal with ‘language and dialogue’ as an integrated whole in different languages and cultures and in different areas: everyday, institutional and literary, in theory and in practice, in business, in court, in the media, in politics and academia. In particular the humanities and social sciences are addressed: linguistics, literary studies, pragmatics, dialogue analysis, communication and cultural studies, applied linguistics, business studies, media studies, studies of language and the law, philosophy, psychology, cognitive sciences, sociology, anthropology and others. The journal Language and Dialogue is a peer reviewed journal and associated with the book series Dialogue Studies, edited by Edda Weigand.

期刊最新文献

Negotiating leader identities through indirect mockery in talk about decision-making in a distributed leadership context Exploring dialogue and culture A dialogic speech act approach to ridiculing references in the French presidential debate of 2022 Building trust in the transport sector during the pandemic The drama of dialogue action in distinct discourse spaces