数字知识共享:美国原住民和土著社区研究人员对使用、影响、风险和最佳实践的看法

IF 1.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE ARCHIVAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2022-01-14 DOI:10.1007/s10502-021-09378-9
Diana E. Marsh
{"title":"数字知识共享:美国原住民和土著社区研究人员对使用、影响、风险和最佳实践的看法","authors":"Diana E. Marsh","doi":"10.1007/s10502-021-09378-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Digital “returns” or “knowledge sharing”—the sharing of digital copies of archival collections with descendant Native and Indigenous communities—has become a key mode of broadening archival access while embracing community-driven curatorship and stewardship models. Yet, little is known about how the products of such programs—namely in the form of digital surrogates—are actually discovered, accessed, used, and circulated “on the ground” in Indigenous community contexts. This paper discusses a project that draws on qualitative interviews and ethnographic methods to fill this gap. I explore the uses and impacts of digitized collections from diverse community-based perspectives, taking the American Philosophical Society’s Digital Knowledge Sharing partnerships as a case study. Through semi-structured interviews with 36 participants and three site visits, the project documents Native community perspectives on the uses, meanings, and circulation of digitized collections in their home communities. I share major findings in eight categories: (1) <i>Barriers</i> to use and access; (2) <i>Circulation</i> of digital surrogate sharing; (3) <i>Formats</i> of digital copies (4) <i>Use</i> in wide-ranging community contexts (5) <i>Benefits</i> of digitization (6) <i>Limits</i> to digital affordances (7) <i>Risks</i> involved in digitization; and (8) <i>Best Practices</i> for archives going forward<i>.</i> This project provides insights for the broader professional communities in libraries, archives, and museums in order to develop best practices and policies for generating relevant and culturally sensitive digitization and digital sharing projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46131,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","volume":"23 1","pages":"81 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-021-09378-9.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital knowledge sharing: perspectives on use, impacts, risks, and best practices according to Native American and Indigenous community-based researchers\",\"authors\":\"Diana E. Marsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10502-021-09378-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Digital “returns” or “knowledge sharing”—the sharing of digital copies of archival collections with descendant Native and Indigenous communities—has become a key mode of broadening archival access while embracing community-driven curatorship and stewardship models. Yet, little is known about how the products of such programs—namely in the form of digital surrogates—are actually discovered, accessed, used, and circulated “on the ground” in Indigenous community contexts. This paper discusses a project that draws on qualitative interviews and ethnographic methods to fill this gap. I explore the uses and impacts of digitized collections from diverse community-based perspectives, taking the American Philosophical Society’s Digital Knowledge Sharing partnerships as a case study. Through semi-structured interviews with 36 participants and three site visits, the project documents Native community perspectives on the uses, meanings, and circulation of digitized collections in their home communities. I share major findings in eight categories: (1) <i>Barriers</i> to use and access; (2) <i>Circulation</i> of digital surrogate sharing; (3) <i>Formats</i> of digital copies (4) <i>Use</i> in wide-ranging community contexts (5) <i>Benefits</i> of digitization (6) <i>Limits</i> to digital affordances (7) <i>Risks</i> involved in digitization; and (8) <i>Best Practices</i> for archives going forward<i>.</i> This project provides insights for the broader professional communities in libraries, archives, and museums in order to develop best practices and policies for generating relevant and culturally sensitive digitization and digital sharing projects.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"81 - 115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10502-021-09378-9.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-021-09378-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10502-021-09378-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

数字“回报”或“知识共享”——与原住民和土著社区的后代共享档案收藏的数字副本——已成为扩大档案访问范围的一种关键模式,同时采用社区驱动的策展和管理模式。然而,人们对这些项目的产品——即以数字代孕的形式——是如何在土著社区环境中“实地”被发现、访问、使用和传播的,知之甚少。本文讨论了一个利用定性访谈和人种学方法来填补这一空白的项目。我以美国哲学学会的数字知识共享伙伴关系为例,从不同的社区视角探讨了数字化藏品的用途和影响。通过对36名参与者的半结构化访谈和三次现场访问,该项目记录了原住民社区对数字化藏品在其家乡社区的用途、意义和流通的看法。我分享了八类主要发现:(1)使用和获取障碍;(2) 数字代理共享的流通;(3) 数字拷贝的格式(4)在广泛的社区环境中的使用(5)数字化的好处(6)数字可供性的限制(7)数字化所涉及的风险;(8)今后档案的最佳做法。该项目为图书馆、档案馆和博物馆的更广泛的专业社区提供了见解,以制定最佳实践和政策,产生相关的、对文化敏感的数字化和数字共享项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital knowledge sharing: perspectives on use, impacts, risks, and best practices according to Native American and Indigenous community-based researchers

Digital “returns” or “knowledge sharing”—the sharing of digital copies of archival collections with descendant Native and Indigenous communities—has become a key mode of broadening archival access while embracing community-driven curatorship and stewardship models. Yet, little is known about how the products of such programs—namely in the form of digital surrogates—are actually discovered, accessed, used, and circulated “on the ground” in Indigenous community contexts. This paper discusses a project that draws on qualitative interviews and ethnographic methods to fill this gap. I explore the uses and impacts of digitized collections from diverse community-based perspectives, taking the American Philosophical Society’s Digital Knowledge Sharing partnerships as a case study. Through semi-structured interviews with 36 participants and three site visits, the project documents Native community perspectives on the uses, meanings, and circulation of digitized collections in their home communities. I share major findings in eight categories: (1) Barriers to use and access; (2) Circulation of digital surrogate sharing; (3) Formats of digital copies (4) Use in wide-ranging community contexts (5) Benefits of digitization (6) Limits to digital affordances (7) Risks involved in digitization; and (8) Best Practices for archives going forward. This project provides insights for the broader professional communities in libraries, archives, and museums in order to develop best practices and policies for generating relevant and culturally sensitive digitization and digital sharing projects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE
ARCHIVAL SCIENCE INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
18.20%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Archival Science promotes the development of archival science as an autonomous scientific discipline. The journal covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practice. Moreover, it investigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and data. It also seeks to promote the exchange and comparison of concepts, views and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the world.Archival Science''s approach is integrated, interdisciplinary, and intercultural. Its scope encompasses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context. To meet its objectives, the journal draws from scientific disciplines that deal with the function of records and the way they are created, preserved, and retrieved; the context in which information is generated, managed, and used; and the social and cultural environment of records creation at different times and places.Covers all aspects of archival science theory, methodology, and practiceInvestigates different cultural approaches to creation, management and provision of access to archives, records, and dataPromotes the exchange and comparison of concepts, views, and attitudes related to recordkeeping issues around the worldAddresses the entire field of recorded process-related information, analyzed in terms of form, structure, and context
期刊最新文献
Dedication and introduction to the provenance special issue Kindred contexts: archives, archaeology, and the concept of provenance The power of provenance in the records continuum Archival context, provenance, and a tool to capture archival context* The archive as home: ruminations on domestic notions of provenance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1