儿童急性疼痛的处理:46天腘窝坐骨神经导管1例报告

Laurent Hertz, C. Sola, P. D. L. Arena, C. Dadure
{"title":"儿童急性疼痛的处理:46天腘窝坐骨神经导管1例报告","authors":"Laurent Hertz, C. Sola, P. D. L. Arena, C. Dadure","doi":"10.23937/2377-4630/1410063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of perineural catheter for more than 72 hours is rare in perioperative practice, but was especially reported for chronic pain, oncologic related pain or palliative care. The main concern remains the risk of neurological or infectious complication. No guideline clearly specifies the maximum duration of perineural catheter maintenance and the safety of long-term catheters is discussed. Case report: We described the case of an 11-year-old boy who suffered a serious injury on his foot. An ultrasound guided sciatic nerve block was performed, with placement of a non-tunneled perineural catheter. The catheter could be used for 46 days with an excellent efficiency both for analgesia (continuous infusion) and anesthesia (additional bolus for surgical procedure). No infectious or neurological related complication to regional anesthesia was notified. Conclusion: This case demonstrates all the benefits that can be expected by long-term perineural catheter, even if it should be managed with great caution and after careful assessment of the risk-benefit balance. number of days before removal of the catheter with an increased risk after 3 days of catheter maintenance [2]. But only few transient and no major neurologic complications were reported [2]. In pediatric, PNBC are often used for postoperative analgesia after orthopedic or general surgery and are typically removed after only 2-3 days. Long term used of PNBC have yet been described for control of chronic pain, oncologic related pain or palliative care in young adults and children [3-5]. We present the case of a child who required the use of a PNBC over a long period of 46 days for perioperative pain management. The child and his family consented to the anonymous publication of this case. Description of the Case An 11-years-old boy, weighting 38 kg, without medical or surgical history, was admitted to our unit after a motor vehicle-pedestrian trauma. The child presented a faciocranial trauma with an initial loss of consciousness but a Glasgow score of 14 at the arrival of medical assistance. A fracture of the right horizontal branch of the mandibular corpus was diagnosed and treated by surgical osteosynthesis. Moreover, there was a severe injury with a large soft tissue defect extending from the internal malleolus to the second phalangeal of the right hallux and musculotendinous and osseous exposure. No vascular compromise was noted and the limited initial neurological exam was not able to objectify significant nerve injury or deficit. The patient complained of diffuse pain. However, shocked by the accident, it was not possible to assess the level of his pain. It was decided to treat him by sedation-analgesia with ketamine. Surgical CASe RePoRt","PeriodicalId":90855,"journal":{"name":"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Pain Management in a Child: A Case Report of 46-Days of Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Catheter\",\"authors\":\"Laurent Hertz, C. Sola, P. D. L. Arena, C. Dadure\",\"doi\":\"10.23937/2377-4630/1410063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The use of perineural catheter for more than 72 hours is rare in perioperative practice, but was especially reported for chronic pain, oncologic related pain or palliative care. The main concern remains the risk of neurological or infectious complication. No guideline clearly specifies the maximum duration of perineural catheter maintenance and the safety of long-term catheters is discussed. Case report: We described the case of an 11-year-old boy who suffered a serious injury on his foot. An ultrasound guided sciatic nerve block was performed, with placement of a non-tunneled perineural catheter. The catheter could be used for 46 days with an excellent efficiency both for analgesia (continuous infusion) and anesthesia (additional bolus for surgical procedure). No infectious or neurological related complication to regional anesthesia was notified. Conclusion: This case demonstrates all the benefits that can be expected by long-term perineural catheter, even if it should be managed with great caution and after careful assessment of the risk-benefit balance. number of days before removal of the catheter with an increased risk after 3 days of catheter maintenance [2]. But only few transient and no major neurologic complications were reported [2]. In pediatric, PNBC are often used for postoperative analgesia after orthopedic or general surgery and are typically removed after only 2-3 days. Long term used of PNBC have yet been described for control of chronic pain, oncologic related pain or palliative care in young adults and children [3-5]. We present the case of a child who required the use of a PNBC over a long period of 46 days for perioperative pain management. The child and his family consented to the anonymous publication of this case. Description of the Case An 11-years-old boy, weighting 38 kg, without medical or surgical history, was admitted to our unit after a motor vehicle-pedestrian trauma. The child presented a faciocranial trauma with an initial loss of consciousness but a Glasgow score of 14 at the arrival of medical assistance. A fracture of the right horizontal branch of the mandibular corpus was diagnosed and treated by surgical osteosynthesis. Moreover, there was a severe injury with a large soft tissue defect extending from the internal malleolus to the second phalangeal of the right hallux and musculotendinous and osseous exposure. No vascular compromise was noted and the limited initial neurological exam was not able to objectify significant nerve injury or deficit. The patient complained of diffuse pain. However, shocked by the accident, it was not possible to assess the level of his pain. It was decided to treat him by sedation-analgesia with ketamine. Surgical CASe RePoRt\",\"PeriodicalId\":90855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23937/2377-4630/1410063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of anesthetics and anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2377-4630/1410063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:围手术期使用神经导管超过72小时的情况很少见,但在慢性疼痛、肿瘤相关疼痛或姑息治疗中尤其有报道。主要关注的仍然是神经系统或感染性并发症的风险。没有明确规定会阴导管维护的最长持续时间的指南,也没有讨论长期导管的安全性。病例报告:我们描述了一个11岁男孩的案例,他的脚受了重伤。在超声引导下进行坐骨神经阻滞,并放置非隧道式神经导管。该导管可使用46天,在镇痛(持续输注)和麻醉(外科手术的额外推注)方面都具有良好的效率。未报告区域麻醉的感染性或神经系统相关并发症。结论:该病例证明了长期神经导管可以预期的所有益处,即使应该非常谨慎地进行管理,并在仔细评估风险-收益平衡后进行管理。移除导管前的天数,导管维护3天后风险增加[2]。但仅报告了少数短暂性神经系统并发症,且无重大神经系统并发症[2]。在儿科,PNBC通常用于骨科或普通外科手术后的术后镇痛,通常仅在2-3天后取出。PNBC的长期使用尚未被描述用于控制年轻成人和儿童的慢性疼痛、肿瘤相关疼痛或姑息治疗[3-5]。我们介绍了一个需要在46天的长时间内使用PNBC进行围手术期疼痛管理的儿童的案例。孩子和他的家人同意匿名公布这一案件。病例描述一名11岁男孩,体重38公斤,无病史或手术史,因机动车行人受伤入院。这名儿童出现了面颅创伤,最初失去意识,但在医疗救助到达时,格拉斯哥评分为14。诊断和治疗了一例下颌骨右侧水平支骨折。此外,还有一个严重的损伤,从内踝延伸到右拇第二指骨的大的软组织缺损,以及肌肉腱和骨暴露。没有发现血管损伤,有限的初步神经检查无法客观化显著的神经损伤或缺损。病人抱怨弥漫性疼痛。然而,由于对事故感到震惊,无法评估他的疼痛程度。决定用氯胺酮进行镇静镇痛治疗。外科病例RePoRt
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute Pain Management in a Child: A Case Report of 46-Days of Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Catheter
Background: The use of perineural catheter for more than 72 hours is rare in perioperative practice, but was especially reported for chronic pain, oncologic related pain or palliative care. The main concern remains the risk of neurological or infectious complication. No guideline clearly specifies the maximum duration of perineural catheter maintenance and the safety of long-term catheters is discussed. Case report: We described the case of an 11-year-old boy who suffered a serious injury on his foot. An ultrasound guided sciatic nerve block was performed, with placement of a non-tunneled perineural catheter. The catheter could be used for 46 days with an excellent efficiency both for analgesia (continuous infusion) and anesthesia (additional bolus for surgical procedure). No infectious or neurological related complication to regional anesthesia was notified. Conclusion: This case demonstrates all the benefits that can be expected by long-term perineural catheter, even if it should be managed with great caution and after careful assessment of the risk-benefit balance. number of days before removal of the catheter with an increased risk after 3 days of catheter maintenance [2]. But only few transient and no major neurologic complications were reported [2]. In pediatric, PNBC are often used for postoperative analgesia after orthopedic or general surgery and are typically removed after only 2-3 days. Long term used of PNBC have yet been described for control of chronic pain, oncologic related pain or palliative care in young adults and children [3-5]. We present the case of a child who required the use of a PNBC over a long period of 46 days for perioperative pain management. The child and his family consented to the anonymous publication of this case. Description of the Case An 11-years-old boy, weighting 38 kg, without medical or surgical history, was admitted to our unit after a motor vehicle-pedestrian trauma. The child presented a faciocranial trauma with an initial loss of consciousness but a Glasgow score of 14 at the arrival of medical assistance. A fracture of the right horizontal branch of the mandibular corpus was diagnosed and treated by surgical osteosynthesis. Moreover, there was a severe injury with a large soft tissue defect extending from the internal malleolus to the second phalangeal of the right hallux and musculotendinous and osseous exposure. No vascular compromise was noted and the limited initial neurological exam was not able to objectify significant nerve injury or deficit. The patient complained of diffuse pain. However, shocked by the accident, it was not possible to assess the level of his pain. It was decided to treat him by sedation-analgesia with ketamine. Surgical CASe RePoRt
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Trapezius Plane Block: Extended Use in Perioperative Pain Management in Nerve Transfer Surgeries A Questionnaire-Based Survey of Perioperative Utilisation of Ultrasound among Anaesthesiology Residents Pseudo Hypoxic Brain Swelling - An Unanticipated Life-Threatening Complication in Neurosurgery - Report of Two Cases with Review of Literature Anesthetic Management of the Case of Removal of Tracheobronchial Foreign Body in a Whistling Child: A Case Report The Use of the Liposomal Bupivacaine in the Quadratus Lumborum Block and Early Surgery Are Key Elements in Facilitating Ambulatory Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1