引力难题:从英国到澳大利亚的“第一舰队”令人困惑的时钟频率测量

IF 0.5 Q4 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage Pub Date : 2022-11-21 DOI:10.3724/sp.j.1440-2807.2022.04.04
R. Grijs
{"title":"引力难题:从英国到澳大利亚的“第一舰队”令人困惑的时钟频率测量","authors":"R. Grijs","doi":"10.3724/sp.j.1440-2807.2022.04.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Voyages of exploration often included astronomers among their crew to aid with maritime navigation. William Dawes, a British Marine who had been trained in practical astronomy, was assigned to the\"First Fleet\", a convoy of eleven ships that left England in May 1787 bound for Botany Bay (Sydney, Australia). Dawes was also expected to take measurements of the local gravitational acceleration, $g$, at any port of call by measuring the daily rate by which his Shelton pendulum clock differed from that at Greenwich, its calibration location. Although Dawes and Nevil Maskelyne, Britain's fifth Astronomer Royal, had planned to obtain clock-rate measurements in the Canary Islands, San Sebastian (Rio de Janeiro) and Table Bay, Captain Arthur Phillip, Commander of the First Fleet, only allowed Dawes to disembark the clock in Rio de Janeiro. Therefore, we have just one set of clock-rate measurements from the voyage, in addition to land-based measurements obtained in New South Wales. If gravity was the dominant factor affecting the clock's changing rate, Dawes' measurement of $-48.067$ sec per (sidereal) day obtained in Rio de Janeiro implies a local gravitational acceleration, $g = 9.7946$ m sec$^{-2}$. On the other hand, if we adopt the modern value, $g = 9.7878$ m s$^{-2}$, the implied daily decay rate is almost exactly 30 sec greater than Dawes' clock-rate determination, a difference that is well in excess of the prevailing uncertainties. This suggests that the pendulum's regulator nut may have been offset by a full turn, thus implying that our assumptions regarding the pendulum length may have to be revisited.","PeriodicalId":42167,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GRAVITATIONAL CONUNDRUM: CONFUSING CLOCK-RATE MEASUREMENTS ON THE 'FIRST FLEET’ FROM ENGLAND TO AUSTRALIA\",\"authors\":\"R. Grijs\",\"doi\":\"10.3724/sp.j.1440-2807.2022.04.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Voyages of exploration often included astronomers among their crew to aid with maritime navigation. William Dawes, a British Marine who had been trained in practical astronomy, was assigned to the\\\"First Fleet\\\", a convoy of eleven ships that left England in May 1787 bound for Botany Bay (Sydney, Australia). Dawes was also expected to take measurements of the local gravitational acceleration, $g$, at any port of call by measuring the daily rate by which his Shelton pendulum clock differed from that at Greenwich, its calibration location. Although Dawes and Nevil Maskelyne, Britain's fifth Astronomer Royal, had planned to obtain clock-rate measurements in the Canary Islands, San Sebastian (Rio de Janeiro) and Table Bay, Captain Arthur Phillip, Commander of the First Fleet, only allowed Dawes to disembark the clock in Rio de Janeiro. Therefore, we have just one set of clock-rate measurements from the voyage, in addition to land-based measurements obtained in New South Wales. If gravity was the dominant factor affecting the clock's changing rate, Dawes' measurement of $-48.067$ sec per (sidereal) day obtained in Rio de Janeiro implies a local gravitational acceleration, $g = 9.7946$ m sec$^{-2}$. On the other hand, if we adopt the modern value, $g = 9.7878$ m s$^{-2}$, the implied daily decay rate is almost exactly 30 sec greater than Dawes' clock-rate determination, a difference that is well in excess of the prevailing uncertainties. This suggests that the pendulum's regulator nut may have been offset by a full turn, thus implying that our assumptions regarding the pendulum length may have to be revisited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1440-2807.2022.04.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1440-2807.2022.04.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

探险之旅的船员中经常包括天文学家,以协助海上航行。威廉·道斯是一名接受过实用天文学训练的英国海军陆战队队员,他被分配到“第一舰队”,这是一支由11艘船组成的护卫队,于1787年5月离开英国前往植物学湾(澳大利亚悉尼)。道斯还预计将在任何停靠港测量当地重力加速度$g$,方法是测量他的谢尔顿摆钟与格林尼治(其校准位置)的摆钟的日变化率。尽管Dawes和英国第五位皇家天文学家Nevil Maskelyne计划在加那利群岛、圣塞巴斯蒂安(里约热内卢)和桌湾测量时钟频率,但第一舰队司令Arthur Phillip上尉只允许Dawes在里约热内卢下船。因此,除了在新南威尔士州获得的陆地测量外,我们只有一组航行中的时钟频率测量值。如果重力是影响时钟变化率的主要因素,Dawes在里约热内卢获得的每(恒星)天-48.067美元的测量值意味着局部重力加速度,$g=9.7946美元-秒$^{-2}$。另一方面,如果我们采用现代值$g=9.7878$ms$^{-2}$,则隐含的每日衰减率几乎正好比Dawes的时钟速率确定值大30秒,这一差异远远超过了普遍的不确定性。这表明摆锤的调节螺母可能已经偏移了一整圈,因此意味着我们可能必须重新考虑关于摆锤长度的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
GRAVITATIONAL CONUNDRUM: CONFUSING CLOCK-RATE MEASUREMENTS ON THE 'FIRST FLEET’ FROM ENGLAND TO AUSTRALIA
Voyages of exploration often included astronomers among their crew to aid with maritime navigation. William Dawes, a British Marine who had been trained in practical astronomy, was assigned to the"First Fleet", a convoy of eleven ships that left England in May 1787 bound for Botany Bay (Sydney, Australia). Dawes was also expected to take measurements of the local gravitational acceleration, $g$, at any port of call by measuring the daily rate by which his Shelton pendulum clock differed from that at Greenwich, its calibration location. Although Dawes and Nevil Maskelyne, Britain's fifth Astronomer Royal, had planned to obtain clock-rate measurements in the Canary Islands, San Sebastian (Rio de Janeiro) and Table Bay, Captain Arthur Phillip, Commander of the First Fleet, only allowed Dawes to disembark the clock in Rio de Janeiro. Therefore, we have just one set of clock-rate measurements from the voyage, in addition to land-based measurements obtained in New South Wales. If gravity was the dominant factor affecting the clock's changing rate, Dawes' measurement of $-48.067$ sec per (sidereal) day obtained in Rio de Janeiro implies a local gravitational acceleration, $g = 9.7946$ m sec$^{-2}$. On the other hand, if we adopt the modern value, $g = 9.7878$ m s$^{-2}$, the implied daily decay rate is almost exactly 30 sec greater than Dawes' clock-rate determination, a difference that is well in excess of the prevailing uncertainties. This suggests that the pendulum's regulator nut may have been offset by a full turn, thus implying that our assumptions regarding the pendulum length may have to be revisited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊最新文献
THE ROLE OF PROMINENCES IN THE HISTORY OF SOLAR PHYSICS TYCHO’S CONVERSATION WITH URANIA, AND OTHER ENGAGEMENTS WITH THE MUSE UNAMBIGUOUS IDENTIFICATION OF THE STAR ĀRDRĀ William Dawes: Scientist, Governor, Abolitionist: Caught Between Science and Religion, by Richard de Grijs and Andrew Jacob. The Age of Epistemology: Aristotelian Logic in Early Modern Philosophy 1500–1700, by Marco Sgarbi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1