Metropole事项

IF 1.1 2区 历史学 Q1 HISTORY WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1353/wmq.2023.a903167
A. Siddique
{"title":"Metropole事项","authors":"A. Siddique","doi":"10.1353/wmq.2023.a903167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In probing the entanglements of empire and revolution, historians of British America have long looked to the scholarship on early modern British politics, culture, and society for guiding narratives, interpretive paradigms, and precedents on which to base their analyses. The mid-twentieth-century studies of the origins of the American Revolution that came to inspire generations of research all relied upon accounts of early modern British political history. The most analytically influential borrowing that historians of early America made from British historiography was surely the concept of republicanism, which scholars of the English Revolution had excavated as an anti-monarchical political language and historians of early America then proposed as a guiding ideological current of the mid-eighteenth-century colonial critique of crown and Parliament.1 Other terms that found powerful application in the scholarship on early modern British politics—such as Whig and mercantilism—have proved equally useful to making sense of the British Atlantic world.2 Yet historiographies are not static: scholarship that in","PeriodicalId":51566,"journal":{"name":"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY","volume":"80 1","pages":"559 - 567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metropole Matters\",\"authors\":\"A. Siddique\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/wmq.2023.a903167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In probing the entanglements of empire and revolution, historians of British America have long looked to the scholarship on early modern British politics, culture, and society for guiding narratives, interpretive paradigms, and precedents on which to base their analyses. The mid-twentieth-century studies of the origins of the American Revolution that came to inspire generations of research all relied upon accounts of early modern British political history. The most analytically influential borrowing that historians of early America made from British historiography was surely the concept of republicanism, which scholars of the English Revolution had excavated as an anti-monarchical political language and historians of early America then proposed as a guiding ideological current of the mid-eighteenth-century colonial critique of crown and Parliament.1 Other terms that found powerful application in the scholarship on early modern British politics—such as Whig and mercantilism—have proved equally useful to making sense of the British Atlantic world.2 Yet historiographies are not static: scholarship that in\",\"PeriodicalId\":51566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"559 - 567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/wmq.2023.a903167\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WILLIAM AND MARY QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/wmq.2023.a903167","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在探究帝国与革命之间的纠葛时,英属美国的历史学家们长期以来一直在寻找关于早期现代英国政治、文化和社会的学术研究,以寻找指导叙事、解释范式和先例,以此作为他们分析的基础。二十世纪中期对美国革命起源的研究启发了几代人的研究,这些研究都依赖于对早期现代英国政治史的描述。早期美国历史学家从英国史学中借鉴的最有影响力的分析无疑是共和主义的概念,研究英国革命的学者将其挖掘为一种反君主制的政治语言,而美国早期的历史学家则将其作为18世纪中期对王权和议会的殖民批判的一种指导思想潮流。其他在研究早期现代英国政治的学术研究中得到有力应用的术语——如辉格党和重商主义——也被证明对理解英属大西洋世界同样有用然而,史学并不是一成不变的:学术在不断发展
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Metropole Matters
In probing the entanglements of empire and revolution, historians of British America have long looked to the scholarship on early modern British politics, culture, and society for guiding narratives, interpretive paradigms, and precedents on which to base their analyses. The mid-twentieth-century studies of the origins of the American Revolution that came to inspire generations of research all relied upon accounts of early modern British political history. The most analytically influential borrowing that historians of early America made from British historiography was surely the concept of republicanism, which scholars of the English Revolution had excavated as an anti-monarchical political language and historians of early America then proposed as a guiding ideological current of the mid-eighteenth-century colonial critique of crown and Parliament.1 Other terms that found powerful application in the scholarship on early modern British politics—such as Whig and mercantilism—have proved equally useful to making sense of the British Atlantic world.2 Yet historiographies are not static: scholarship that in
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
期刊最新文献
Cultivating Empire: Capitalism, Philanthropy, and the Negotiation of American Imperialism in Indian Country by Lori J. Daggar (review) The Great Power of Native Women Editor's Note: "Methods and Practices" Historical Care and the (Re)Writing of Sexual Violence in the Colonial Americas To Her Credit: Women, Finance, and the Law in Eighteenth-Century New England Cities by Sara T. Damiano (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1