{"title":"来自数据分析的预测:马来西亚数据保护法是否适用?","authors":"T. San","doi":"10.1080/13600834.2020.1759276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As data analytics become prevalent in industries in Malaysia to draw predictions about individuals’ habits and behaviour, it is important that certainty exists about the legal status of predictions vis-à-vis data protection law. The predictions can be privacy-intrusive and threaten individuals’ autonomy, although this may not always be so. The Malaysian Personal Data Protection Act 2010 is silent on the legal status of predictions. This paper examines whether the Malaysian Parliament should extend the Act to provide control to individuals over predictions about themselves. In doing so, the paper explores the position in the EU, Japan, Australia and the USA. The finding is that in those jurisdictions, predictions are within the remit of data protection law. It is argued that this is an over-generalisation and is inconsonant with commercial realities. The author advocates that a different approach be adopted to achieve a balance between individuals’ interest to control their data and commercial needs to use predictions without undue hindrance.","PeriodicalId":44342,"journal":{"name":"Information & Communications Technology Law","volume":"29 1","pages":"291 - 307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600834.2020.1759276","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictions from data analytics: Does Malaysian data protection law apply?\",\"authors\":\"T. San\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13600834.2020.1759276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT As data analytics become prevalent in industries in Malaysia to draw predictions about individuals’ habits and behaviour, it is important that certainty exists about the legal status of predictions vis-à-vis data protection law. The predictions can be privacy-intrusive and threaten individuals’ autonomy, although this may not always be so. The Malaysian Personal Data Protection Act 2010 is silent on the legal status of predictions. This paper examines whether the Malaysian Parliament should extend the Act to provide control to individuals over predictions about themselves. In doing so, the paper explores the position in the EU, Japan, Australia and the USA. The finding is that in those jurisdictions, predictions are within the remit of data protection law. It is argued that this is an over-generalisation and is inconsonant with commercial realities. The author advocates that a different approach be adopted to achieve a balance between individuals’ interest to control their data and commercial needs to use predictions without undue hindrance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information & Communications Technology Law\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"291 - 307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600834.2020.1759276\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information & Communications Technology Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2020.1759276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Communications Technology Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2020.1759276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predictions from data analytics: Does Malaysian data protection law apply?
ABSTRACT As data analytics become prevalent in industries in Malaysia to draw predictions about individuals’ habits and behaviour, it is important that certainty exists about the legal status of predictions vis-à-vis data protection law. The predictions can be privacy-intrusive and threaten individuals’ autonomy, although this may not always be so. The Malaysian Personal Data Protection Act 2010 is silent on the legal status of predictions. This paper examines whether the Malaysian Parliament should extend the Act to provide control to individuals over predictions about themselves. In doing so, the paper explores the position in the EU, Japan, Australia and the USA. The finding is that in those jurisdictions, predictions are within the remit of data protection law. It is argued that this is an over-generalisation and is inconsonant with commercial realities. The author advocates that a different approach be adopted to achieve a balance between individuals’ interest to control their data and commercial needs to use predictions without undue hindrance.
期刊介绍:
The last decade has seen the introduction of computers and information technology at many levels of human transaction. Information technology (IT) is now used for data collation, in daily commercial transactions like transfer of funds, conclusion of contract, and complex diagnostic purposes in fields such as law, medicine and transport. The use of IT has expanded rapidly with the introduction of multimedia and the Internet. Any new technology inevitably raises a number of questions ranging from the legal to the ethical and the social. Information & Communications Technology Law covers topics such as: the implications of IT for legal processes and legal decision-making and related ethical and social issues.