来自数据分析的预测:马来西亚数据保护法是否适用?

T. San
{"title":"来自数据分析的预测:马来西亚数据保护法是否适用?","authors":"T. San","doi":"10.1080/13600834.2020.1759276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As data analytics become prevalent in industries in Malaysia to draw predictions about individuals’ habits and behaviour, it is important that certainty exists about the legal status of predictions vis-à-vis data protection law. The predictions can be privacy-intrusive and threaten individuals’ autonomy, although this may not always be so. The Malaysian Personal Data Protection Act 2010 is silent on the legal status of predictions. This paper examines whether the Malaysian Parliament should extend the Act to provide control to individuals over predictions about themselves. In doing so, the paper explores the position in the EU, Japan, Australia and the USA. The finding is that in those jurisdictions, predictions are within the remit of data protection law. It is argued that this is an over-generalisation and is inconsonant with commercial realities. The author advocates that a different approach be adopted to achieve a balance between individuals’ interest to control their data and commercial needs to use predictions without undue hindrance.","PeriodicalId":44342,"journal":{"name":"Information & Communications Technology Law","volume":"29 1","pages":"291 - 307"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600834.2020.1759276","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictions from data analytics: Does Malaysian data protection law apply?\",\"authors\":\"T. San\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13600834.2020.1759276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT As data analytics become prevalent in industries in Malaysia to draw predictions about individuals’ habits and behaviour, it is important that certainty exists about the legal status of predictions vis-à-vis data protection law. The predictions can be privacy-intrusive and threaten individuals’ autonomy, although this may not always be so. The Malaysian Personal Data Protection Act 2010 is silent on the legal status of predictions. This paper examines whether the Malaysian Parliament should extend the Act to provide control to individuals over predictions about themselves. In doing so, the paper explores the position in the EU, Japan, Australia and the USA. The finding is that in those jurisdictions, predictions are within the remit of data protection law. It is argued that this is an over-generalisation and is inconsonant with commercial realities. The author advocates that a different approach be adopted to achieve a balance between individuals’ interest to control their data and commercial needs to use predictions without undue hindrance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information & Communications Technology Law\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"291 - 307\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13600834.2020.1759276\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information & Communications Technology Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2020.1759276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information & Communications Technology Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600834.2020.1759276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要随着数据分析在马来西亚的行业中越来越普遍,以对个人的习惯和行为进行预测,重要的是要确定预测相对于数据保护法的法律地位。这些预测可能会侵犯隐私,威胁个人的自主权,尽管情况并非总是如此。2010年《马来西亚个人数据保护法》对预测的法律地位保持沉默。本文探讨了马来西亚议会是否应该扩大该法案的范围,以控制个人对自己的预测。在这样做的过程中,本文探讨了欧盟、日本、澳大利亚和美国的立场。研究结果表明,在这些司法管辖区,预测属于数据保护法的管辖范围。有人认为,这是一种过度概括,与商业现实不符。作者主张采取不同的方法,在个人控制数据的兴趣和在没有不当阻碍的情况下使用预测的商业需求之间实现平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predictions from data analytics: Does Malaysian data protection law apply?
ABSTRACT As data analytics become prevalent in industries in Malaysia to draw predictions about individuals’ habits and behaviour, it is important that certainty exists about the legal status of predictions vis-à-vis data protection law. The predictions can be privacy-intrusive and threaten individuals’ autonomy, although this may not always be so. The Malaysian Personal Data Protection Act 2010 is silent on the legal status of predictions. This paper examines whether the Malaysian Parliament should extend the Act to provide control to individuals over predictions about themselves. In doing so, the paper explores the position in the EU, Japan, Australia and the USA. The finding is that in those jurisdictions, predictions are within the remit of data protection law. It is argued that this is an over-generalisation and is inconsonant with commercial realities. The author advocates that a different approach be adopted to achieve a balance between individuals’ interest to control their data and commercial needs to use predictions without undue hindrance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The last decade has seen the introduction of computers and information technology at many levels of human transaction. Information technology (IT) is now used for data collation, in daily commercial transactions like transfer of funds, conclusion of contract, and complex diagnostic purposes in fields such as law, medicine and transport. The use of IT has expanded rapidly with the introduction of multimedia and the Internet. Any new technology inevitably raises a number of questions ranging from the legal to the ethical and the social. Information & Communications Technology Law covers topics such as: the implications of IT for legal processes and legal decision-making and related ethical and social issues.
期刊最新文献
When objects betray you: the Internet of Things and the privilege against self-incrimination From object obfuscation to contextually-dependent identification: enhancing automated privacy protection in street-level image platforms (SLIPs) Balancing the autonomy and protection of children: competency challenges in data protection law Fidelity in legal coding: applying legal translation frameworks to address interpretive challenges The role of corporate social responsibility in the regulation of OTT platforms: the case of film industry and Turkish corporate law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1