为什么农业政策对环境没有更大的野心?比较瑞士的失败尝试

IF 12.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Resources Environment and Sustainability Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100096
Stefan Mann , Antonia Kaiser
{"title":"为什么农业政策对环境没有更大的野心?比较瑞士的失败尝试","authors":"Stefan Mann ,&nbsp;Antonia Kaiser","doi":"10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Switzerland is a country that has ambitious agri-environmental objectives, but its targets are continuously missed. The paper at hand examines this contradiction by describing and analysing three recent attempts to transform agricultural policies and change the unfortunate situation. The three cases were compared in a qualitative multimethod research design and along dimensions that are potentially relevant for explaining reform failures. While the attempts depicted involved distinctive governance pathways, they all failed to meet their objectives because of the large disadvantages their realisation would have generated. These included, above all, a reduction of the national self-sufficiency rate. It is concluded that the strategy of providing incentives for mere extensification has reached a dead end. New strategies to tackle food consumption patterns appear to be more promising.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34479,"journal":{"name":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100096"},"PeriodicalIF":12.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why is agricultural policy not more environmentally ambitious? Comparing failed attempts in Switzerland\",\"authors\":\"Stefan Mann ,&nbsp;Antonia Kaiser\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resenv.2022.100096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Switzerland is a country that has ambitious agri-environmental objectives, but its targets are continuously missed. The paper at hand examines this contradiction by describing and analysing three recent attempts to transform agricultural policies and change the unfortunate situation. The three cases were compared in a qualitative multimethod research design and along dimensions that are potentially relevant for explaining reform failures. While the attempts depicted involved distinctive governance pathways, they all failed to meet their objectives because of the large disadvantages their realisation would have generated. These included, above all, a reduction of the national self-sufficiency rate. It is concluded that the strategy of providing incentives for mere extensification has reached a dead end. New strategies to tackle food consumption patterns appear to be more promising.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Environment and Sustainability\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Environment and Sustainability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916122000408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Environment and Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666916122000408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

瑞士是一个有着雄心勃勃的农业环境目标的国家,但它的目标总是无法实现。本文通过描述和分析最近三次改变农业政策和改变不幸状况的尝试来检验这种矛盾。这三个案例在定性的多方法研究设计中进行了比较,并沿着可能与解释改革失败相关的维度进行了比较。尽管所描述的尝试涉及不同的治理途径,但它们都未能实现其目标,因为它们的实现将产生巨大的不利因素。这些措施首先包括降低国家自给率。结论是,仅仅为扩大提供奖励的战略已走入死胡同。解决食品消费模式的新策略似乎更有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why is agricultural policy not more environmentally ambitious? Comparing failed attempts in Switzerland

Switzerland is a country that has ambitious agri-environmental objectives, but its targets are continuously missed. The paper at hand examines this contradiction by describing and analysing three recent attempts to transform agricultural policies and change the unfortunate situation. The three cases were compared in a qualitative multimethod research design and along dimensions that are potentially relevant for explaining reform failures. While the attempts depicted involved distinctive governance pathways, they all failed to meet their objectives because of the large disadvantages their realisation would have generated. These included, above all, a reduction of the national self-sufficiency rate. It is concluded that the strategy of providing incentives for mere extensification has reached a dead end. New strategies to tackle food consumption patterns appear to be more promising.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Environment and Sustainability
Resources Environment and Sustainability Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
33 days
期刊最新文献
Effects of asymmetric policies to achieve emissions reduction on energy trade: A North American perspective An efficient strategy to promote food waste composting by adding black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae during the compost maturation phase Household energy use and barriers in clean transition in the Tibetan Plateau Enhancing the performance of runoff prediction in data-scarce hydrological domains using advanced transfer learning Unveiling driving disparities between satisfaction and equity of ecosystem services in urbanized areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1