青少年COGTEL的面对面评估:复试信度及其与学校成绩的关系

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia Pub Date : 2020-12-30 DOI:10.14349/rlp.2020.v52.17
B. Gouveia, É. Gouveia, M. Kliegel, Helder Lopes, Ana Rodrigues, A. Marques, Ana Luísa Correia, Ricardo Alves, A. Ihle
{"title":"青少年COGTEL的面对面评估:复试信度及其与学校成绩的关系","authors":"B. Gouveia, É. Gouveia, M. Kliegel, Helder Lopes, Ana Rodrigues, A. Marques, Ana Luísa Correia, Ricardo Alves, A. Ihle","doi":"10.14349/rlp.2020.v52.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL) has shown to be a brief, reliable, and valid instrument to assess cognitive functioning in adults in face-to-face procedures as well as over the phone. So far, no psychometric evaluation exists on its use in adolescents. The present study set out to evaluate the psychometric properties of the face-to-face application of the COGTEL in adolescents in the school context and to analyse the association with school grades. We assessed cognitive performance using COGTEL in face-to-face assessments of 170 adolescents, with retests after 6 months for test-retest reliability. Predictive validity was assessed using school grades. Test-retest reliability for the COGTEL was good (ICC = .77; p < .001). The partial correlation controlling for age between COGTEL and school grades was medium and positive (r = .40; p < .001). School grades alone explained 42% and 36% of the variance in the COGTEL total score in elementary and secondary students, respectively. The present study suggests that COGTEL is a reliable and valid instrument to assess cognitive functioning in adolescents, with the advantage of feasibility in multiple contexts.","PeriodicalId":46559,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Face-to-face Assessment of COGTEL in Adolescents: Test-Retest Reliability and Association with School Grades\",\"authors\":\"B. Gouveia, É. Gouveia, M. Kliegel, Helder Lopes, Ana Rodrigues, A. Marques, Ana Luísa Correia, Ricardo Alves, A. Ihle\",\"doi\":\"10.14349/rlp.2020.v52.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL) has shown to be a brief, reliable, and valid instrument to assess cognitive functioning in adults in face-to-face procedures as well as over the phone. So far, no psychometric evaluation exists on its use in adolescents. The present study set out to evaluate the psychometric properties of the face-to-face application of the COGTEL in adolescents in the school context and to analyse the association with school grades. We assessed cognitive performance using COGTEL in face-to-face assessments of 170 adolescents, with retests after 6 months for test-retest reliability. Predictive validity was assessed using school grades. Test-retest reliability for the COGTEL was good (ICC = .77; p < .001). The partial correlation controlling for age between COGTEL and school grades was medium and positive (r = .40; p < .001). School grades alone explained 42% and 36% of the variance in the COGTEL total score in elementary and secondary students, respectively. The present study suggests that COGTEL is a reliable and valid instrument to assess cognitive functioning in adolescents, with the advantage of feasibility in multiple contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2020.v52.17\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.2020.v52.17","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

认知电话筛查工具(COGTEL)已被证明是一种简单、可靠和有效的工具,可以在面对面程序和电话中评估成年人的认知功能。到目前为止,还没有对其在青少年中的使用进行心理测量评估。本研究旨在评估青少年在学校环境中面对面应用COGTEL的心理测量特性,并分析其与学校成绩的关系。我们在170名青少年的面对面评估中使用COGTEL评估了认知表现,并在6个月后重新测试测试的可靠性。预测有效性使用学校成绩进行评估。COGTEL的测试-再测试可靠性良好(ICC=.77;p<.001)。控制年龄的COGTEL与学校成绩之间的偏相关为中等正相关(r=.40;p<0.001)。仅学校成绩就分别解释了中小学生COGTEL总分42%和36%的差异。本研究表明,COGTEL是评估青少年认知功能的一种可靠有效的工具,在多种情况下具有可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Face-to-face Assessment of COGTEL in Adolescents: Test-Retest Reliability and Association with School Grades
The Cognitive Telephone Screening Instrument (COGTEL) has shown to be a brief, reliable, and valid instrument to assess cognitive functioning in adults in face-to-face procedures as well as over the phone. So far, no psychometric evaluation exists on its use in adolescents. The present study set out to evaluate the psychometric properties of the face-to-face application of the COGTEL in adolescents in the school context and to analyse the association with school grades. We assessed cognitive performance using COGTEL in face-to-face assessments of 170 adolescents, with retests after 6 months for test-retest reliability. Predictive validity was assessed using school grades. Test-retest reliability for the COGTEL was good (ICC = .77; p < .001). The partial correlation controlling for age between COGTEL and school grades was medium and positive (r = .40; p < .001). School grades alone explained 42% and 36% of the variance in the COGTEL total score in elementary and secondary students, respectively. The present study suggests that COGTEL is a reliable and valid instrument to assess cognitive functioning in adolescents, with the advantage of feasibility in multiple contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia
Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Revista latinoamericana de Psicología (RLP) is a four month publication from Konrad Lorenz Fundación Universitaria. The RLP evaluates works that belong to one of the following categories: original papers (with empiric and new information) of many psychology fields (regardless of the methodology used) or qualitative/quantitative systematic reviews. Eventually it will be interested on works’ revision related to the development psychology tools or softwares, original methodology papers and researches which evaluate psychology from scientometry. The RLP is not interested in publishing non-systematic reviews or states of the art, case studies, protocols studies, hypothesis or papers proposals, letters, commentaries or essays, opinions articles, politics documents nor other sort of secondary literature. Traditionally, there have been monographics, books’ reviews and “others” published in “Mundo de la Psicología”, nevertheless these modalities will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Actitudes desde la clase social baja hacia la clase social alta: el papel del contacto y la ansiedad intergrupal Efectos de la modalidad de presentación de un mensaje de educación-entretenimiento de prevención del VIH Concerns About Inequality in Health, Education and Income Jointly Predict Collective Actions Cross-cultural adaptation of the Science Motivation Questionnaire II (SMQ-II) for Portuguesespeaking Brazilian secondary school students Psychometric properties of the Entrepreneurial Intention Questionnaire (EIQ) in Dominican Republic adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1