机器人辅助部分肾切除术是一种安全有效的T1期肾肿瘤切除方法吗?

D. Choudhary, Shams Tabrej Asgarali Ansari, E. Galeti, S. Shahab
{"title":"机器人辅助部分肾切除术是一种安全有效的T1期肾肿瘤切除方法吗?","authors":"D. Choudhary, Shams Tabrej Asgarali Ansari, E. Galeti, S. Shahab","doi":"10.32948/auo.2022.03.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Robotic surgery has now evolved as an emerging tool for better and easy operative techniques. The quest for trifecta comprising warm ischemia time less than 25 minutes, negative surgical margins and no perioperative complications seems to be better accomplished by robotic partial nephrectomy, which is likely to become the new standard for minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.\nMaterials & Methods It is a prospective observational study over 18 months in patients aged more > 18 years with a renal tumour of clinical stage T1 coming for robotic partial nephrectomy. A total of 40 patients were included in the study who underwent robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumours less than 7 cm in size. The duration of the study was from July- 2018 to December-2019 and their follow up period was 3 months post-surgery.\nResults Of the 40 patients, the mean age was 52.3 ± 11.91 years. 28 (70%) patients were males and remaining 12 (30%) were females. 11 (27.5%) tumours were situated in the anterior upper pole, 9 (22.5%) in the anterior lower pole, 8 (20%) in the posterior upper pole, 7 (17.5%) in the posterior lower pole and interpolar tumours were 5 in number (12.5%). 24 (60%) tumors were ≥ 50% exophytic, 11 (27.5%) were < 50% exophytic and 5 (12.5%) were purely endophytic in nature. Maximum nephrometry score was 5a amounting to 10 (25%) patients and 5p tumours were the second most common amounting to 7 (17.5%) patients. The mean console time was noted to be 84.40± 12.05 mins. The mean total operative time was noted to be 167.00 ± 21.116 minutes. Mean Warm Ischemia Time (WIT) was recorded to be 27.28 ± 5.923 minutes. The mean blood loss was 145.75±61.075 ml. The mean length of hospital stay was 4.27 ± 0.78 days. None of the cases was converted to open partial/radical nephrectomy and none had positive surgical margins in the histopathology reports.\nConclusion Our study shows that Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) is an efficacious and safe surgery in stage T1 renal tumours (tumour size <7 cm) to achieve complete oncological clearance by minimal access technique.","PeriodicalId":33190,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Urologic Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy an efficacious and safe procedure for removal of stage T1 renal tumors?\",\"authors\":\"D. Choudhary, Shams Tabrej Asgarali Ansari, E. Galeti, S. Shahab\",\"doi\":\"10.32948/auo.2022.03.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Robotic surgery has now evolved as an emerging tool for better and easy operative techniques. The quest for trifecta comprising warm ischemia time less than 25 minutes, negative surgical margins and no perioperative complications seems to be better accomplished by robotic partial nephrectomy, which is likely to become the new standard for minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.\\nMaterials & Methods It is a prospective observational study over 18 months in patients aged more > 18 years with a renal tumour of clinical stage T1 coming for robotic partial nephrectomy. A total of 40 patients were included in the study who underwent robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumours less than 7 cm in size. The duration of the study was from July- 2018 to December-2019 and their follow up period was 3 months post-surgery.\\nResults Of the 40 patients, the mean age was 52.3 ± 11.91 years. 28 (70%) patients were males and remaining 12 (30%) were females. 11 (27.5%) tumours were situated in the anterior upper pole, 9 (22.5%) in the anterior lower pole, 8 (20%) in the posterior upper pole, 7 (17.5%) in the posterior lower pole and interpolar tumours were 5 in number (12.5%). 24 (60%) tumors were ≥ 50% exophytic, 11 (27.5%) were < 50% exophytic and 5 (12.5%) were purely endophytic in nature. Maximum nephrometry score was 5a amounting to 10 (25%) patients and 5p tumours were the second most common amounting to 7 (17.5%) patients. The mean console time was noted to be 84.40± 12.05 mins. The mean total operative time was noted to be 167.00 ± 21.116 minutes. Mean Warm Ischemia Time (WIT) was recorded to be 27.28 ± 5.923 minutes. The mean blood loss was 145.75±61.075 ml. The mean length of hospital stay was 4.27 ± 0.78 days. None of the cases was converted to open partial/radical nephrectomy and none had positive surgical margins in the histopathology reports.\\nConclusion Our study shows that Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) is an efficacious and safe surgery in stage T1 renal tumours (tumour size <7 cm) to achieve complete oncological clearance by minimal access technique.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Urologic Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Urologic Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32948/auo.2022.03.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Urologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32948/auo.2022.03.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人手术现在已经发展成为一种更好、更简单的手术技术的新兴工具。机器人肾部分切除术似乎能更好地实现热缺血时间小于25分钟、手术切缘阴性和无围手术期并发症的三联征,有可能成为微创肾部分切除术的新标准。材料与方法:这是一项为期18个月的前瞻性观察性研究,研究对象是年龄大于18岁、临床分期为T1的肾肿瘤患者,他们将接受机器人部分肾切除术。该研究共纳入了40例因肾肿瘤小于7厘米而接受机器人辅助部分肾切除术的患者。研究时间为2018年7月至2019年12月,随访时间为手术后3个月。结果40例患者平均年龄52.3±11.91岁。男性28例(70%),女性12例(30%)。肿瘤位于前上极11例(27.5%),前下极9例(22.5%),后上极8例(20%),后下极7例(17.5%),极间肿瘤5例(12.5%)。≥50%外生性肿瘤24例(60%),< 50%外生性肿瘤11例(27.5%),纯内生性肿瘤5例(12.5%)。最高肾测量评分为5a,共有10例(25%)患者,5p肿瘤是第二常见的,共有7例(17.5%)患者。平均控制台时间为84.40±12.05 min。平均总手术时间为167.00±21.116分钟。平均热缺血时间(WIT)为27.28±5.923 min。平均失血量145.75±61.075 ml,平均住院时间4.27±0.78 d。在组织病理学报告中,没有一例转为开放式部分/根治性肾切除术,也没有一例手术切缘阳性。结论机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)是一种有效且安全的手术,可以通过最小通路技术治疗T1期肾肿瘤(肿瘤大小< 7cm),实现肿瘤的完全清除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Is Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy an efficacious and safe procedure for removal of stage T1 renal tumors?
Background Robotic surgery has now evolved as an emerging tool for better and easy operative techniques. The quest for trifecta comprising warm ischemia time less than 25 minutes, negative surgical margins and no perioperative complications seems to be better accomplished by robotic partial nephrectomy, which is likely to become the new standard for minimally invasive partial nephrectomy. Materials & Methods It is a prospective observational study over 18 months in patients aged more > 18 years with a renal tumour of clinical stage T1 coming for robotic partial nephrectomy. A total of 40 patients were included in the study who underwent robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal tumours less than 7 cm in size. The duration of the study was from July- 2018 to December-2019 and their follow up period was 3 months post-surgery. Results Of the 40 patients, the mean age was 52.3 ± 11.91 years. 28 (70%) patients were males and remaining 12 (30%) were females. 11 (27.5%) tumours were situated in the anterior upper pole, 9 (22.5%) in the anterior lower pole, 8 (20%) in the posterior upper pole, 7 (17.5%) in the posterior lower pole and interpolar tumours were 5 in number (12.5%). 24 (60%) tumors were ≥ 50% exophytic, 11 (27.5%) were < 50% exophytic and 5 (12.5%) were purely endophytic in nature. Maximum nephrometry score was 5a amounting to 10 (25%) patients and 5p tumours were the second most common amounting to 7 (17.5%) patients. The mean console time was noted to be 84.40± 12.05 mins. The mean total operative time was noted to be 167.00 ± 21.116 minutes. Mean Warm Ischemia Time (WIT) was recorded to be 27.28 ± 5.923 minutes. The mean blood loss was 145.75±61.075 ml. The mean length of hospital stay was 4.27 ± 0.78 days. None of the cases was converted to open partial/radical nephrectomy and none had positive surgical margins in the histopathology reports. Conclusion Our study shows that Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) is an efficacious and safe surgery in stage T1 renal tumours (tumour size <7 cm) to achieve complete oncological clearance by minimal access technique.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Features and Significance of Malignant Priapism Research Progress on the Association between Obesity and Prostate Cancer Exploration of Apoptosis in Histopathologies of Balkan Endemic Nephropathies with Both Urothelial Tumour and Atrophied Kidney The relationship between vitamin D, chronic kidney disease, and mineral and bone disorder: a complex interplay comprehensive review Incidental Detection of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma in Nephrectomy Specimen for Chronic Pyelonephritis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1