{"title":"这不是一个[床]房间","authors":"Marta Silveira Peixoto, Angélica Paiva Ponzio","doi":"10.1080/20419112.2021.1962620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the commitments of modern architecture was to transform home living. Spaces were to be reviewed through new notions on use, fluidity, and transparency, often leading to formerly compartmentalized areas occupied by bulky furniture and pre-arranged compositions being opened up. In this way, some architects started experimenting with new arrangements, not only for single-family housing, but also in new apartment building configurations. This article, therefore, takes a perspective on two different but complementary home living experiments, by comparing Gio Ponti's Via Dezza apartment (Milan, Italy) and Paulo Mendes da Rocha's Butantã house (São Paulo, Brazil). Even though they come from different backgrounds and time periods, these works are similar in some of their fundamental principles, especially regarding the way they conceive the room. While designing their own home environments, these architects were able to freely express the essence of their ideas about home living. In both cases though, issues believed to be undeniable, such as privacy and intimacy, were treated in a very authorial way, sharing in common a particular way of interpreting the notion of the room.","PeriodicalId":41420,"journal":{"name":"Interiors-Design Architecture Culture","volume":"11 1","pages":"253 - 281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"This is not a [bed]room\",\"authors\":\"Marta Silveira Peixoto, Angélica Paiva Ponzio\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20419112.2021.1962620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the commitments of modern architecture was to transform home living. Spaces were to be reviewed through new notions on use, fluidity, and transparency, often leading to formerly compartmentalized areas occupied by bulky furniture and pre-arranged compositions being opened up. In this way, some architects started experimenting with new arrangements, not only for single-family housing, but also in new apartment building configurations. This article, therefore, takes a perspective on two different but complementary home living experiments, by comparing Gio Ponti's Via Dezza apartment (Milan, Italy) and Paulo Mendes da Rocha's Butantã house (São Paulo, Brazil). Even though they come from different backgrounds and time periods, these works are similar in some of their fundamental principles, especially regarding the way they conceive the room. While designing their own home environments, these architects were able to freely express the essence of their ideas about home living. In both cases though, issues believed to be undeniable, such as privacy and intimacy, were treated in a very authorial way, sharing in common a particular way of interpreting the notion of the room.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interiors-Design Architecture Culture\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"253 - 281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interiors-Design Architecture Culture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20419112.2021.1962620\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interiors-Design Architecture Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20419112.2021.1962620","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
现代建筑的承诺之一是改变家庭生活。空间将通过使用、流动性和透明度的新概念进行审查,通常会导致以前由笨重家具和预先布置的构图占据的区域被打开。通过这种方式,一些建筑师开始尝试新的安排,不仅适用于独栋住宅,也适用于新的公寓楼配置。因此,本文通过比较Gio Ponti的Via Dezza公寓(意大利米兰)和Paulo Mendes da Rocha的Butantãhouse(巴西圣保罗),来看待两个不同但互补的家庭生活实验。尽管他们来自不同的背景和时间段,但这些作品在一些基本原则上是相似的,尤其是在他们构思房间的方式上。在设计自己的家居环境时,这些建筑师能够自由地表达他们关于家居生活的想法的本质。然而,在这两种情况下,被认为是不可否认的问题,如隐私和亲密关系,都以一种非常权威的方式处理,共同分享了一种解释房间概念的特殊方式。
One of the commitments of modern architecture was to transform home living. Spaces were to be reviewed through new notions on use, fluidity, and transparency, often leading to formerly compartmentalized areas occupied by bulky furniture and pre-arranged compositions being opened up. In this way, some architects started experimenting with new arrangements, not only for single-family housing, but also in new apartment building configurations. This article, therefore, takes a perspective on two different but complementary home living experiments, by comparing Gio Ponti's Via Dezza apartment (Milan, Italy) and Paulo Mendes da Rocha's Butantã house (São Paulo, Brazil). Even though they come from different backgrounds and time periods, these works are similar in some of their fundamental principles, especially regarding the way they conceive the room. While designing their own home environments, these architects were able to freely express the essence of their ideas about home living. In both cases though, issues believed to be undeniable, such as privacy and intimacy, were treated in a very authorial way, sharing in common a particular way of interpreting the notion of the room.