{"title":"从恐慌到困惑再到谈判——来自印尼新冠肺炎早期应对的思考","authors":"Setiadi Setiadi, Elan Lazuardi","doi":"10.21512/humaniora.v12i2.7012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research reflected on the response to the pandemic that emerged as it happened. It drew attention to the viral aspect of a pandemic, namely how people understood and responded to pandemics using various digital platforms. It questioned the context and reasons for what it called an immeasurable but organized community response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital-based research was applied through observing three mainstream digital media (Kompas TV, The Jakarta Post, and Detik.com) and social media (i.e., WhatsApp Messenger and Twitter). Data were analyzed thematically by categorizing the ways people responded to COVID-19 via social media into three thematic phases. In the first phase, digital media was used to voice frustration and disappointment with the government’s response. This had sparked public distrust of the government’s ability to deal with the pandemic at the national level. The second phase was the confusion phase. The rise of public discussion about the pandemic showed that the public was concerned about the development of the COVID-19 news in the country. The last phase was the negotiation phase. While COVID-19 was rapidly becoming a source of panic and confusion, grassroots initiatives emerged using social media. These initiatives aimed to help reduce panic and reduce socio-economic impacts. This research shows how anthropologists can still pay attention to social relations forged through social media in times of crisis where traditional anthropological fieldwork is nearly impossible. Methodologically, digital anthropology or social media ethnography is gaining momentum to be developed, considering that fieldwork cannot be done in the pandemic era.","PeriodicalId":30545,"journal":{"name":"Humaniora","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Panic to Confusion to Negotiation: Reflection from Early Response to Covid-19 in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Setiadi Setiadi, Elan Lazuardi\",\"doi\":\"10.21512/humaniora.v12i2.7012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research reflected on the response to the pandemic that emerged as it happened. It drew attention to the viral aspect of a pandemic, namely how people understood and responded to pandemics using various digital platforms. It questioned the context and reasons for what it called an immeasurable but organized community response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital-based research was applied through observing three mainstream digital media (Kompas TV, The Jakarta Post, and Detik.com) and social media (i.e., WhatsApp Messenger and Twitter). Data were analyzed thematically by categorizing the ways people responded to COVID-19 via social media into three thematic phases. In the first phase, digital media was used to voice frustration and disappointment with the government’s response. This had sparked public distrust of the government’s ability to deal with the pandemic at the national level. The second phase was the confusion phase. The rise of public discussion about the pandemic showed that the public was concerned about the development of the COVID-19 news in the country. The last phase was the negotiation phase. While COVID-19 was rapidly becoming a source of panic and confusion, grassroots initiatives emerged using social media. These initiatives aimed to help reduce panic and reduce socio-economic impacts. This research shows how anthropologists can still pay attention to social relations forged through social media in times of crisis where traditional anthropological fieldwork is nearly impossible. Methodologically, digital anthropology or social media ethnography is gaining momentum to be developed, considering that fieldwork cannot be done in the pandemic era.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30545,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Humaniora\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Humaniora\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v12i2.7012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humaniora","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v12i2.7012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项研究反映了疫情发生时对疫情的反应。它提请人们注意大流行的病毒方面,即人们如何利用各种数字平台理解和应对大流行。它质疑其所称的对新冠肺炎大流行的不可估量但有组织的社区反应的背景和原因。基于数字的研究通过观察三种主流数字媒体(Kompas TV、The Jakarta Post和Detik.com)和社交媒体(即WhatsApp Messenger和Twitter)来应用。通过将人们通过社交媒体应对新冠肺炎的方式分为三个主题阶段,对数据进行了主题分析。在第一阶段,数字媒体被用来表达对政府回应的沮丧和失望。这引发了公众对政府在国家层面应对疫情能力的不信任。第二阶段是混乱阶段。公众对疫情的讨论上升表明,公众对新冠肺炎新闻在该国的发展感到担忧。最后一个阶段是谈判阶段。当新冠肺炎迅速成为恐慌和混乱的根源时,草根阶层利用社交媒体发起了倡议。这些举措旨在帮助减少恐慌和减少社会经济影响。这项研究表明,在传统人类学田野调查几乎不可能的危机时期,人类学家仍然可以关注通过社交媒体建立的社会关系。在方法论上,考虑到在疫情时代无法进行实地调查,数字人类学或社交媒体民族志的发展势头越来越大。
From Panic to Confusion to Negotiation: Reflection from Early Response to Covid-19 in Indonesia
This research reflected on the response to the pandemic that emerged as it happened. It drew attention to the viral aspect of a pandemic, namely how people understood and responded to pandemics using various digital platforms. It questioned the context and reasons for what it called an immeasurable but organized community response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Digital-based research was applied through observing three mainstream digital media (Kompas TV, The Jakarta Post, and Detik.com) and social media (i.e., WhatsApp Messenger and Twitter). Data were analyzed thematically by categorizing the ways people responded to COVID-19 via social media into three thematic phases. In the first phase, digital media was used to voice frustration and disappointment with the government’s response. This had sparked public distrust of the government’s ability to deal with the pandemic at the national level. The second phase was the confusion phase. The rise of public discussion about the pandemic showed that the public was concerned about the development of the COVID-19 news in the country. The last phase was the negotiation phase. While COVID-19 was rapidly becoming a source of panic and confusion, grassroots initiatives emerged using social media. These initiatives aimed to help reduce panic and reduce socio-economic impacts. This research shows how anthropologists can still pay attention to social relations forged through social media in times of crisis where traditional anthropological fieldwork is nearly impossible. Methodologically, digital anthropology or social media ethnography is gaining momentum to be developed, considering that fieldwork cannot be done in the pandemic era.