在新冠肺炎期间,在安全的儿童之家减少事件:学习的机会

IF 0.7 Q4 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research Pub Date : 2022-01-24 DOI:10.1108/jacpr-09-2021-0639
A. Mckeown, Gemma Macmillan, E. Watkins, D. Caveney, Anna Smith, P. J. Kennedy, R. Atkins, Robyn Lee
{"title":"在新冠肺炎期间,在安全的儿童之家减少事件:学习的机会","authors":"A. Mckeown, Gemma Macmillan, E. Watkins, D. Caveney, Anna Smith, P. J. Kennedy, R. Atkins, Robyn Lee","doi":"10.1108/jacpr-09-2021-0639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented for young people within the UK. The pandemic has presented particular challenges for vulnerable children and young people. For example, a recent study in the UK indicated that 83% of young people with existing mental health conditions said the pandemic had made their condition worse (Young Minds, 2020). To date, the impact upon populations such as young people in Secure Children’s Homes (SCHs) is unknown. This study aims to elucidate this area.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nSCHs provide a safe, supportive environment for vulnerable young people who frequently present with multiple and complex needs. Young people residing within a SCH may be residing at the setting because of a Secure Accommodation Order under a Section 25 Order of the Children’s Act (1989) or for criminal justice reasons, i.e. serving a Remand period or custodial sentence. Preliminary research compared a baseline period to a follow-up period after the commencement of COVID-19 national lockdown measures within a SCH in the North of England to develop understanding of the impact for young people.\n\n\nFindings\nA significant decrease in overall incidents (t (5) = −6.88, p < 0.001), restraints (t (5) = −9.07, p < 0.001) and other incidents including assaults occurred during follow-up. The SECURE STAIRS framework supports trauma-informed care and enhances support within the setting. Consistent with the framework, provision of formulation meetings was significantly increased within the follow-up period (Welsh’s t (74) = −2.74, p < 0.001). Reflections and future recommendations are outlined.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe unanticipated results highlight the value of examining incident data within secure environments and could lead to effective practice changes for practitioners working within this domain. This research also demonstrates how frameworks such as SECURE STAIRS can be beneficial for vulnerable young people during periods of change and stress in mitigating some of the potential negative effects. The implementation of such frameworks within SCHs is still novel and thus evaluative research is valuable.\n","PeriodicalId":45499,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reduction in incidents during COVID-19 in a Secure Children’s Home: an opportunity for learning\",\"authors\":\"A. Mckeown, Gemma Macmillan, E. Watkins, D. Caveney, Anna Smith, P. J. Kennedy, R. Atkins, Robyn Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jacpr-09-2021-0639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented for young people within the UK. The pandemic has presented particular challenges for vulnerable children and young people. For example, a recent study in the UK indicated that 83% of young people with existing mental health conditions said the pandemic had made their condition worse (Young Minds, 2020). To date, the impact upon populations such as young people in Secure Children’s Homes (SCHs) is unknown. This study aims to elucidate this area.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nSCHs provide a safe, supportive environment for vulnerable young people who frequently present with multiple and complex needs. Young people residing within a SCH may be residing at the setting because of a Secure Accommodation Order under a Section 25 Order of the Children’s Act (1989) or for criminal justice reasons, i.e. serving a Remand period or custodial sentence. Preliminary research compared a baseline period to a follow-up period after the commencement of COVID-19 national lockdown measures within a SCH in the North of England to develop understanding of the impact for young people.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nA significant decrease in overall incidents (t (5) = −6.88, p < 0.001), restraints (t (5) = −9.07, p < 0.001) and other incidents including assaults occurred during follow-up. The SECURE STAIRS framework supports trauma-informed care and enhances support within the setting. Consistent with the framework, provision of formulation meetings was significantly increased within the follow-up period (Welsh’s t (74) = −2.74, p < 0.001). Reflections and future recommendations are outlined.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThe unanticipated results highlight the value of examining incident data within secure environments and could lead to effective practice changes for practitioners working within this domain. This research also demonstrates how frameworks such as SECURE STAIRS can be beneficial for vulnerable young people during periods of change and stress in mitigating some of the potential negative effects. The implementation of such frameworks within SCHs is still novel and thus evaluative research is valuable.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jacpr-09-2021-0639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aggression Conflict and Peace Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jacpr-09-2021-0639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的新冠肺炎大流行对英国年轻人来说是前所未有的。这场大流行给弱势儿童和年轻人带来了特别的挑战。例如,英国最近的一项研究表明,83%有心理健康问题的年轻人表示,疫情使他们的病情恶化(young Minds,2020)。到目前为止,对安全儿童之家(SCH)中的年轻人等人群的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在阐明这一领域。SCH的设计/方法/方法为经常有多种复杂需求的弱势年轻人提供了一个安全、支持性的环境。居住在SCH内的年轻人可能是因为《儿童法》(1989年)第25条命令下的安全住宿令或刑事司法原因(即正在服刑或监禁)而住在该场所。初步研究将新冠肺炎全国封锁措施在英格兰北部的SCH内开始后的基线期与随访期进行了比较,以了解其对年轻人的影响。调查结果随访期间发生的总体事件(t(5)=−6.88,p<0.001)、约束(t(五)=−9.07,p<001)和包括袭击在内的其他事件显著减少。安全STAIRS框架支持创伤知情护理,并加强环境内的支持。与该框架一致,在随访期内,配方会议的提供显著增加(威尔士的t(74)=-2.74,p<0.001)。概述了反思和未来的建议。独创性/价值出乎意料的结果突出了在安全环境中检查事故数据的价值,并可能为该领域的从业者带来有效的实践变革。这项研究还表明,在变化和压力时期,安全阶梯等框架如何有利于弱势年轻人,减轻一些潜在的负面影响。在SCH中实施此类框架仍然是新颖的,因此评估研究是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reduction in incidents during COVID-19 in a Secure Children’s Home: an opportunity for learning
Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented for young people within the UK. The pandemic has presented particular challenges for vulnerable children and young people. For example, a recent study in the UK indicated that 83% of young people with existing mental health conditions said the pandemic had made their condition worse (Young Minds, 2020). To date, the impact upon populations such as young people in Secure Children’s Homes (SCHs) is unknown. This study aims to elucidate this area. Design/methodology/approach SCHs provide a safe, supportive environment for vulnerable young people who frequently present with multiple and complex needs. Young people residing within a SCH may be residing at the setting because of a Secure Accommodation Order under a Section 25 Order of the Children’s Act (1989) or for criminal justice reasons, i.e. serving a Remand period or custodial sentence. Preliminary research compared a baseline period to a follow-up period after the commencement of COVID-19 national lockdown measures within a SCH in the North of England to develop understanding of the impact for young people. Findings A significant decrease in overall incidents (t (5) = −6.88, p < 0.001), restraints (t (5) = −9.07, p < 0.001) and other incidents including assaults occurred during follow-up. The SECURE STAIRS framework supports trauma-informed care and enhances support within the setting. Consistent with the framework, provision of formulation meetings was significantly increased within the follow-up period (Welsh’s t (74) = −2.74, p < 0.001). Reflections and future recommendations are outlined. Originality/value The unanticipated results highlight the value of examining incident data within secure environments and could lead to effective practice changes for practitioners working within this domain. This research also demonstrates how frameworks such as SECURE STAIRS can be beneficial for vulnerable young people during periods of change and stress in mitigating some of the potential negative effects. The implementation of such frameworks within SCHs is still novel and thus evaluative research is valuable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Why do they decide to stay? Experience of Indian women surviving intimate partner violence Invited commentary on using music intervention and imagined interaction to deal with aggression and conflict The appreciation of the collaboration agreements used to prevent intrafamilial homicides State responses to herder–farmers conflict and peace-building in rural grazing areas of Nigeria To stay silent or to blow the whistle? Bystander’s intervening acts when witnessing intimate partner violence (IPV)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1