农场大厅——另一个样子

IF 0.6 2区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI:10.1002/bewi.202200031
Dieter Hoffmann
{"title":"农场大厅——另一个样子","authors":"Dieter Hoffmann","doi":"10.1002/bewi.202200031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>When the American Physical Society (APS) awarded me the 2020 Abraham Pais Prize for History of Physics, I was asked to submit a topic for my laureate lecture. After some thoughts I proposed that the APS's Forum for History and Philosophy of Physics should deviate from tradition and have not only the laureate, but also other colleagues speak in a themed session at the 2020 APS Spring Meeting. My proposal was accepted along with my proposed theme, “Farm Hall.”</p><p>The internment of ten German atomic physicists at the English manor estate Farm Hall near Cambridge during the second half of 1945 and the transcripts of some of their conversations, which were secretly recorded and selectively transcribed by the British secret service, represent a unique and fascinating source in the history of modern physics. During the past three decades, these transcripts have repeatedly—and almost cyclically—become the focus of intense discussions. It was therefore only natural to use the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the internment for a corresponding session, especially since Farm Hall is also of outstanding importance for my own work in the history of physics.</p><p>I was one of the first researchers—perhaps the first German historian (of science)—to examine the transcripts and related documents stored at the US National Archives after their release in spring 1992. This was entirely not so much a merit as sheer researcher's luck, because that spring I happened to make my first ever visit to what for me (as an East German) was literally the “New World.” As a fellow of the Humboldt Foundation, I was a guest of Gerald Holton at Harvard. My journey also took me to Washington, D.C., and, not entirely coincidentally, to the National Archives. After my return to Berlin, and not least through the encouragement of my friend and colleague Mark Walker, the idea of a German edition of the Farm Hall transcripts arose. It was by no means an easy task to find a German publisher, but eventually the German edition was published practically simultaneously with the English edition in the summer of 1993.<sup>1</sup></p><p>For the APS session, American scholars were invited who are not only experts on the subject of Farm Hall, but who also belong to my closer American circle of colleagues and to whom I owe many a helpful suggestion and reference on the subject. Unfortunately, the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic prevented the scheduled session from taking place as planned at the 2020 APS Spring Meeting; it was instead held as an online event on 15 March 2021.</p><p>What follows are revised versions of the papers given by Ryan Dahn (American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD) and Mark Walker (Union College, Schenectady, NY) as well as essays by David Cassidy (Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY) and Gerald Holton (Harvard University Cambridge, MA). A newcomer to the “club of veteran Farm Hall historians,” Dahn takes a fresh look at the transcripts and discusses why they are not the smoking gun they appear to be when it comes to determining whether German physicists intended to develop a nuclear bomb. Walker reappraises Heisenberg's apparent confusion at Farm Hall by contextualizing Heisenberg's knowledge about the working of atomic bombs and by comparing it to the contemporary state of affairs in the US; his contribution can also be read as an implicit response to Manfred Popp's recent polemic.<sup>2</sup> Cassidy discusses turning Farm Hall into a drama and provides a personal account of the challenges of writing a historical play as a professional historian. Finally, Holton—one of the last living eyewitnesses—gives a brief account of the long and difficult road to the release of the Farm Hall transcripts. Unfortunately, the adverse circumstances of the past few months have prevented the timely completion of my own manuscript. The paper is analyzing Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker's role in Farm Hall and the importance of Farm Hall for his further intellectual development in postwar Germany. The paper will be published in one of the next issues of this journal.</p><p> </p><p>Dieter Hoffmann, 10 May 2022</p>","PeriodicalId":55388,"journal":{"name":"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bewi.202200031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Farm Hall—Another Look\",\"authors\":\"Dieter Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bewi.202200031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>When the American Physical Society (APS) awarded me the 2020 Abraham Pais Prize for History of Physics, I was asked to submit a topic for my laureate lecture. After some thoughts I proposed that the APS's Forum for History and Philosophy of Physics should deviate from tradition and have not only the laureate, but also other colleagues speak in a themed session at the 2020 APS Spring Meeting. My proposal was accepted along with my proposed theme, “Farm Hall.”</p><p>The internment of ten German atomic physicists at the English manor estate Farm Hall near Cambridge during the second half of 1945 and the transcripts of some of their conversations, which were secretly recorded and selectively transcribed by the British secret service, represent a unique and fascinating source in the history of modern physics. During the past three decades, these transcripts have repeatedly—and almost cyclically—become the focus of intense discussions. It was therefore only natural to use the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the internment for a corresponding session, especially since Farm Hall is also of outstanding importance for my own work in the history of physics.</p><p>I was one of the first researchers—perhaps the first German historian (of science)—to examine the transcripts and related documents stored at the US National Archives after their release in spring 1992. This was entirely not so much a merit as sheer researcher's luck, because that spring I happened to make my first ever visit to what for me (as an East German) was literally the “New World.” As a fellow of the Humboldt Foundation, I was a guest of Gerald Holton at Harvard. My journey also took me to Washington, D.C., and, not entirely coincidentally, to the National Archives. After my return to Berlin, and not least through the encouragement of my friend and colleague Mark Walker, the idea of a German edition of the Farm Hall transcripts arose. It was by no means an easy task to find a German publisher, but eventually the German edition was published practically simultaneously with the English edition in the summer of 1993.<sup>1</sup></p><p>For the APS session, American scholars were invited who are not only experts on the subject of Farm Hall, but who also belong to my closer American circle of colleagues and to whom I owe many a helpful suggestion and reference on the subject. Unfortunately, the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic prevented the scheduled session from taking place as planned at the 2020 APS Spring Meeting; it was instead held as an online event on 15 March 2021.</p><p>What follows are revised versions of the papers given by Ryan Dahn (American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD) and Mark Walker (Union College, Schenectady, NY) as well as essays by David Cassidy (Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY) and Gerald Holton (Harvard University Cambridge, MA). A newcomer to the “club of veteran Farm Hall historians,” Dahn takes a fresh look at the transcripts and discusses why they are not the smoking gun they appear to be when it comes to determining whether German physicists intended to develop a nuclear bomb. Walker reappraises Heisenberg's apparent confusion at Farm Hall by contextualizing Heisenberg's knowledge about the working of atomic bombs and by comparing it to the contemporary state of affairs in the US; his contribution can also be read as an implicit response to Manfred Popp's recent polemic.<sup>2</sup> Cassidy discusses turning Farm Hall into a drama and provides a personal account of the challenges of writing a historical play as a professional historian. Finally, Holton—one of the last living eyewitnesses—gives a brief account of the long and difficult road to the release of the Farm Hall transcripts. Unfortunately, the adverse circumstances of the past few months have prevented the timely completion of my own manuscript. The paper is analyzing Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker's role in Farm Hall and the importance of Farm Hall for his further intellectual development in postwar Germany. The paper will be published in one of the next issues of this journal.</p><p> </p><p>Dieter Hoffmann, 10 May 2022</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bewi.202200031\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bewi.202200031\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bewi.202200031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当美国物理学会(APS)授予我2020年亚伯拉罕·派斯物理史奖时,我被要求为我的获奖演讲提交一个主题。经过一番思考,我提出,APS的物理历史与哲学论坛应该偏离传统,不仅让获奖者,而且让其他同事在2020年APS春季会议的主题会议上发言。我的提案和我提出的主题“农场大厅”一起被采纳了。1945年下半年,十名德国原子物理学家被关押在剑桥附近的英国庄园农场大厅(English manor estate Farm Hall),英国情报机构秘密记录并有选择地抄录了他们的一些谈话记录,这些记录代表了现代物理学史上独特而迷人的资料。在过去的三十年里,这些文本反复地——几乎是周期性地——成为激烈讨论的焦点。因此,利用关押75周年的机会举行相应的会议是很自然的,特别是因为农场大厅对我自己在物理学史上的工作也非常重要。我是第一批研究人员之一——也许是第一个(科学)德国历史学家——在1992年春天美国国家档案馆公布了这些记录和相关文件后,对它们进行了研究。与其说这是一个优点,不如说是纯粹的研究运气,因为那年春天,我碰巧第一次去了我(作为一个东德人)真正意义上的“新世界”。作为洪堡基金会的成员,我是哈佛大学杰拉尔德·霍尔顿的客人。我的旅程还把我带到了华盛顿特区,而且,并非完全巧合的是,我还去了国家档案馆。回到柏林后,在我的朋友兼同事马克·沃克(Mark Walker)的鼓励下,我萌生了出版《农场大厅》德文版本的想法。要找到一家德国出版商绝非易事,但最终在1993年夏天,德文版本几乎与英文版本同时出版了。美国科学学会的会议邀请了美国学者,他们不仅是《农场大厅》方面的专家,而且也是我在美国的同事圈子里的一员,在这个问题上,他们给了我许多有益的建议和参考。不幸的是,冠状病毒大流行的爆发使预定的会议未能按计划在2020年APS春季会议上举行;而是在2021年3月15日以在线活动的形式举行。以下是Ryan Dahn(美国物理研究所,马里兰大学帕克分校)和Mark Walker(联合学院,斯克内克塔迪,纽约州)给出的论文的修订版,以及David Cassidy(霍夫斯特拉大学,亨普斯特德,纽约州)和Gerald Holton(哈佛大学剑桥,马萨诸塞州)的论文。作为“资深农场大厅历史学家俱乐部”的新成员,达恩以全新的眼光看待这些记录,并讨论了为什么在确定德国物理学家是否打算开发核弹时,它们并不是确凿的证据。沃克通过将海森堡关于原子弹工作的知识置于背景中,并将其与当代美国的事态进行比较,重新评价了海森堡在农场大厅的明显困惑;他的贡献也可以被解读为对曼弗雷德·波普(Manfred Popp)最近争论的含蓄回应卡西迪讨论了把农场大厅变成一部戏剧,并提供了一个个人的挑战,写一个专业历史学家的历史剧本。最后,霍尔顿——最后在世的目击者之一——简要叙述了通往公布农场大厅记录的漫长而艰难的道路。不幸的是,过去几个月的不利情况使我无法及时完成自己的手稿。本文分析了卡尔·弗里德里希·冯Weizsäcker在农场大厅中的作用,以及农场大厅对他在战后德国进一步智力发展的重要性。这篇论文将发表在该杂志的下一期上。迪特尔·霍夫曼,2022年5月10日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Farm Hall—Another Look

When the American Physical Society (APS) awarded me the 2020 Abraham Pais Prize for History of Physics, I was asked to submit a topic for my laureate lecture. After some thoughts I proposed that the APS's Forum for History and Philosophy of Physics should deviate from tradition and have not only the laureate, but also other colleagues speak in a themed session at the 2020 APS Spring Meeting. My proposal was accepted along with my proposed theme, “Farm Hall.”

The internment of ten German atomic physicists at the English manor estate Farm Hall near Cambridge during the second half of 1945 and the transcripts of some of their conversations, which were secretly recorded and selectively transcribed by the British secret service, represent a unique and fascinating source in the history of modern physics. During the past three decades, these transcripts have repeatedly—and almost cyclically—become the focus of intense discussions. It was therefore only natural to use the occasion of the 75th anniversary of the internment for a corresponding session, especially since Farm Hall is also of outstanding importance for my own work in the history of physics.

I was one of the first researchers—perhaps the first German historian (of science)—to examine the transcripts and related documents stored at the US National Archives after their release in spring 1992. This was entirely not so much a merit as sheer researcher's luck, because that spring I happened to make my first ever visit to what for me (as an East German) was literally the “New World.” As a fellow of the Humboldt Foundation, I was a guest of Gerald Holton at Harvard. My journey also took me to Washington, D.C., and, not entirely coincidentally, to the National Archives. After my return to Berlin, and not least through the encouragement of my friend and colleague Mark Walker, the idea of a German edition of the Farm Hall transcripts arose. It was by no means an easy task to find a German publisher, but eventually the German edition was published practically simultaneously with the English edition in the summer of 1993.1

For the APS session, American scholars were invited who are not only experts on the subject of Farm Hall, but who also belong to my closer American circle of colleagues and to whom I owe many a helpful suggestion and reference on the subject. Unfortunately, the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic prevented the scheduled session from taking place as planned at the 2020 APS Spring Meeting; it was instead held as an online event on 15 March 2021.

What follows are revised versions of the papers given by Ryan Dahn (American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD) and Mark Walker (Union College, Schenectady, NY) as well as essays by David Cassidy (Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY) and Gerald Holton (Harvard University Cambridge, MA). A newcomer to the “club of veteran Farm Hall historians,” Dahn takes a fresh look at the transcripts and discusses why they are not the smoking gun they appear to be when it comes to determining whether German physicists intended to develop a nuclear bomb. Walker reappraises Heisenberg's apparent confusion at Farm Hall by contextualizing Heisenberg's knowledge about the working of atomic bombs and by comparing it to the contemporary state of affairs in the US; his contribution can also be read as an implicit response to Manfred Popp's recent polemic.2 Cassidy discusses turning Farm Hall into a drama and provides a personal account of the challenges of writing a historical play as a professional historian. Finally, Holton—one of the last living eyewitnesses—gives a brief account of the long and difficult road to the release of the Farm Hall transcripts. Unfortunately, the adverse circumstances of the past few months have prevented the timely completion of my own manuscript. The paper is analyzing Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker's role in Farm Hall and the importance of Farm Hall for his further intellectual development in postwar Germany. The paper will be published in one of the next issues of this journal.

 

Dieter Hoffmann, 10 May 2022

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte
Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Geschichte der Wissenschaften ist in erster Linie eine Geschichte der Ideen und Entdeckungen, oft genug aber auch der Moden, Irrtümer und Missverständnisse. Sie hängt eng mit der Entwicklung kultureller und zivilisatorischer Leistungen zusammen und bleibt von der politischen Geschichte keineswegs unberührt.
期刊最新文献
Western Anthelmintics in Early Twentieth-Century China Colonial Practices and Knowledge on "Tropical Diseases" of the In/between. Between Living and Non-living: Materiality of the Placenta in Ming China. Inhaltsverzeichnis: Ber. Wissenschaftsgesch. 3/2024 Titelbild: (Ber. Wissenschaftsgesch. 3/2024) Science in Community: Anatomy, Academy, and Argument in the Eighteenth-Century Holy Roman Empire**
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1