对智障人士进行眼动脱敏和再加工远程传递的一些观察

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities Pub Date : 2023-01-13 DOI:10.1111/jppi.12452
Gemma Unwin, Biza Stenfert-Kroese, Gemma Rogers, Sophie Swain, Steve Hiles, Clair Clifford, Derek Farrell, Paul Willner
{"title":"对智障人士进行眼动脱敏和再加工远程传递的一些观察","authors":"Gemma Unwin,&nbsp;Biza Stenfert-Kroese,&nbsp;Gemma Rogers,&nbsp;Sophie Swain,&nbsp;Steve Hiles,&nbsp;Clair Clifford,&nbsp;Derek Farrell,&nbsp;Paul Willner","doi":"10.1111/jppi.12452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is increasingly recognised that many people with intellectual disabilities suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Eye-movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) has been proposed as a potentially helpful intervention that is less reliant on verbal skills than other effective treatments for PTSD and therefore could be more effective than verbal interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. The Trauma-AID project is a randomised clinical trial (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness of a bespoke EMDR protocol for adults with intellectual disability and PTSD, which incorporates a prolonged phase of Psycho-Education and Stabilisation (PES) prior to the trauma confrontation phase of EMDR. The COVID-19 pandemic struck during the feasibility phase of the Trauma-AID project, necessitating a second feasibility study to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of remote or hybrid delivery of the PES + EMDR protocol. To this end, we conducted two online surveys of therapists followed by interviews with clients, carers and senior therapists. The surveys were analysed descriptively. Content analysis was used for client and carer interviews, and framework analysis for therapist interviews. All stakeholders reported positive experiences of EMDR; however, some challenges were identified. The majority of clients, carers and therapists interviewed reported that the intervention, whether PES alone or the full PES-EMDR package, had improved symptoms of PTSD and psychological well-being, and carers also reported decreases in challenging behaviour. A full account of the data is provided in four Supplementary Digital files. PES-EMDR therapy appears both feasible and acceptable for clients with intellectual disabilities and therapists, whether delivered face-to-face or in a remote or hybrid mode, though remote working appears easier for the PES phase than the EMDR phase of the intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":47236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"20 2","pages":"205-215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12452","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some observations on remote delivery of eye-movement desensitisation and reprocessing to people with intellectual disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Gemma Unwin,&nbsp;Biza Stenfert-Kroese,&nbsp;Gemma Rogers,&nbsp;Sophie Swain,&nbsp;Steve Hiles,&nbsp;Clair Clifford,&nbsp;Derek Farrell,&nbsp;Paul Willner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jppi.12452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>It is increasingly recognised that many people with intellectual disabilities suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Eye-movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) has been proposed as a potentially helpful intervention that is less reliant on verbal skills than other effective treatments for PTSD and therefore could be more effective than verbal interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. The Trauma-AID project is a randomised clinical trial (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness of a bespoke EMDR protocol for adults with intellectual disability and PTSD, which incorporates a prolonged phase of Psycho-Education and Stabilisation (PES) prior to the trauma confrontation phase of EMDR. The COVID-19 pandemic struck during the feasibility phase of the Trauma-AID project, necessitating a second feasibility study to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of remote or hybrid delivery of the PES + EMDR protocol. To this end, we conducted two online surveys of therapists followed by interviews with clients, carers and senior therapists. The surveys were analysed descriptively. Content analysis was used for client and carer interviews, and framework analysis for therapist interviews. All stakeholders reported positive experiences of EMDR; however, some challenges were identified. The majority of clients, carers and therapists interviewed reported that the intervention, whether PES alone or the full PES-EMDR package, had improved symptoms of PTSD and psychological well-being, and carers also reported decreases in challenging behaviour. A full account of the data is provided in four Supplementary Digital files. PES-EMDR therapy appears both feasible and acceptable for clients with intellectual disabilities and therapists, whether delivered face-to-face or in a remote or hybrid mode, though remote working appears easier for the PES phase than the EMDR phase of the intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"20 2\",\"pages\":\"205-215\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jppi.12452\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12452\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jppi.12452","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人们越来越认识到,许多智障人士患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。眼动脱敏和再加工(EMDR)被认为是一种潜在的有益干预措施,与其他有效的创伤后应激障碍治疗方法相比,它对语言技能的依赖性较小,因此对智障患者来说可能比语言干预更有效。创伤援助项目是一项随机临床试验(RCT),评估针对智力残疾和创伤后应激障碍成年人的定制EMDR方案的有效性,该方案在EMDR的创伤对抗阶段之前纳入了长期的心理教育和稳定(PES)阶段。新冠肺炎疫情发生在创伤急救项目的可行性阶段,需要进行第二次可行性研究,以评估远程或混合交付PES的可接受性和可行性 + EMDR协议。为此,我们对治疗师进行了两次在线调查,然后采访了客户、护理人员和高级治疗师。对调查进行了描述性分析。内容分析用于客户和护理人员访谈,框架分析用于治疗师访谈。所有利益相关者都报告了EMDR的积极经验;然而,也发现了一些挑战。接受采访的大多数客户、护理人员和治疗师报告称,无论是单独的PES还是完整的PES‐EMDR包,干预都改善了创伤后应激障碍症状和心理健康,护理人员也报告了挑战行为的减少。四个补充数字文件提供了数据的完整说明。PES‐EMDR治疗对于智障患者和治疗师来说似乎既可行又可接受,无论是面对面还是远程或混合模式,尽管远程工作在PES阶段似乎比干预的EMDR阶段更容易。[来自作者]
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Some observations on remote delivery of eye-movement desensitisation and reprocessing to people with intellectual disabilities

It is increasingly recognised that many people with intellectual disabilities suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Eye-movement desensitisation and reprocessing (EMDR) has been proposed as a potentially helpful intervention that is less reliant on verbal skills than other effective treatments for PTSD and therefore could be more effective than verbal interventions for people with intellectual disabilities. The Trauma-AID project is a randomised clinical trial (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness of a bespoke EMDR protocol for adults with intellectual disability and PTSD, which incorporates a prolonged phase of Psycho-Education and Stabilisation (PES) prior to the trauma confrontation phase of EMDR. The COVID-19 pandemic struck during the feasibility phase of the Trauma-AID project, necessitating a second feasibility study to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of remote or hybrid delivery of the PES + EMDR protocol. To this end, we conducted two online surveys of therapists followed by interviews with clients, carers and senior therapists. The surveys were analysed descriptively. Content analysis was used for client and carer interviews, and framework analysis for therapist interviews. All stakeholders reported positive experiences of EMDR; however, some challenges were identified. The majority of clients, carers and therapists interviewed reported that the intervention, whether PES alone or the full PES-EMDR package, had improved symptoms of PTSD and psychological well-being, and carers also reported decreases in challenging behaviour. A full account of the data is provided in four Supplementary Digital files. PES-EMDR therapy appears both feasible and acceptable for clients with intellectual disabilities and therapists, whether delivered face-to-face or in a remote or hybrid mode, though remote working appears easier for the PES phase than the EMDR phase of the intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
What Would Have Helped People With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities in the UK During COVID-19? Talk-LD and Talk-LD+: A pilot trial of school-based interventions to challenge discrimination and promote inclusion Moving toward a time-based and balanced quality of life Evaluation of an Australian community-based model of care for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities undergoing procedures under sedation After us, together with us: Quality of life in adults with disabilities in an inclusive and sustainable future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1