德国五个政策部门的生物多样性政策整合:我们如何转变治理以使实施工作发挥作用?

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2023.100175
Fabian Pröbstl , Axel Paulsch , Luciana Zedda , Nicole Nöske , Elsa Maria Cardona Santos , Yves Zinngrebe
{"title":"德国五个政策部门的生物多样性政策整合:我们如何转变治理以使实施工作发挥作用?","authors":"Fabian Pröbstl ,&nbsp;Axel Paulsch ,&nbsp;Luciana Zedda ,&nbsp;Nicole Nöske ,&nbsp;Elsa Maria Cardona Santos ,&nbsp;Yves Zinngrebe","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2023.100175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Drivers for biodiversity loss are largely regulated by policies in non-environmental sectors. The limited mainstreaming of biodiversity into respective policies remains yet to be analysed. During the process of updating the German National Biodiversity Strategy, we conducted 33 interviews and a stakeholder workshop to analyse barriers and levers for biodiversity integration in five policy sectors: agriculture, forests, marine &amp; coastal areas, business &amp; industries, rural &amp; urban development. Based on Biodiversity Policy Integration literature, we distinguish four leverage points for transformation related to inclusive, integrated, accountable and adaptive governance. We found that biodiversity inclusive narratives and innovative approaches exist but are overshadowed by conflicting vested interests. Dominant sector policies are incoherent and continue to provide harmful subsidies. Institutional structures fail to reflexively respond to ambitious agendas and are locked into sector specific accountability hierarchies. Thus, transformative national planning needs to overcome institutional lock-ins and empower agents to develop innovative solutions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100175"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biodiversity policy integration in five policy sectors in Germany: How can we transform governance to make implementation work?\",\"authors\":\"Fabian Pröbstl ,&nbsp;Axel Paulsch ,&nbsp;Luciana Zedda ,&nbsp;Nicole Nöske ,&nbsp;Elsa Maria Cardona Santos ,&nbsp;Yves Zinngrebe\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esg.2023.100175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Drivers for biodiversity loss are largely regulated by policies in non-environmental sectors. The limited mainstreaming of biodiversity into respective policies remains yet to be analysed. During the process of updating the German National Biodiversity Strategy, we conducted 33 interviews and a stakeholder workshop to analyse barriers and levers for biodiversity integration in five policy sectors: agriculture, forests, marine &amp; coastal areas, business &amp; industries, rural &amp; urban development. Based on Biodiversity Policy Integration literature, we distinguish four leverage points for transformation related to inclusive, integrated, accountable and adaptive governance. We found that biodiversity inclusive narratives and innovative approaches exist but are overshadowed by conflicting vested interests. Dominant sector policies are incoherent and continue to provide harmful subsidies. Institutional structures fail to reflexively respond to ambitious agendas and are locked into sector specific accountability hierarchies. Thus, transformative national planning needs to overcome institutional lock-ins and empower agents to develop innovative solutions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth System Governance\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth System Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811623000125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811623000125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

生物多样性丧失的驱动因素在很大程度上受到非环境部门政策的管制。将生物多样性有限地纳入各自政策的主流仍有待分析。在更新德国国家生物多样性战略的过程中,我们进行了33次访谈和利益相关者研讨会,以分析农业、森林、海洋和生物多样性整合的五个政策部门的障碍和杠杆。沿海地区,商业& &;工业、农村;城市发展。基于生物多样性政策整合的相关文献,我们区分了四个与包容性、综合性、问责性和适应性治理相关的转型杠杆点。我们发现,生物多样性包容性叙事和创新方法是存在的,但被既得利益冲突所掩盖。主导部门的政策不连贯,并继续提供有害的补贴。体制结构未能对雄心勃勃的议程作出条件反射性反应,并被锁定在特定部门的问责等级制度中。因此,变革性的国家规划需要克服体制上的束缚,并赋予行动者制定创新解决方案的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Biodiversity policy integration in five policy sectors in Germany: How can we transform governance to make implementation work?

Drivers for biodiversity loss are largely regulated by policies in non-environmental sectors. The limited mainstreaming of biodiversity into respective policies remains yet to be analysed. During the process of updating the German National Biodiversity Strategy, we conducted 33 interviews and a stakeholder workshop to analyse barriers and levers for biodiversity integration in five policy sectors: agriculture, forests, marine & coastal areas, business & industries, rural & urban development. Based on Biodiversity Policy Integration literature, we distinguish four leverage points for transformation related to inclusive, integrated, accountable and adaptive governance. We found that biodiversity inclusive narratives and innovative approaches exist but are overshadowed by conflicting vested interests. Dominant sector policies are incoherent and continue to provide harmful subsidies. Institutional structures fail to reflexively respond to ambitious agendas and are locked into sector specific accountability hierarchies. Thus, transformative national planning needs to overcome institutional lock-ins and empower agents to develop innovative solutions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diversifying climate policy advice: Research agenda on the expertise of national climate councils Jurisdictional approaches to sustainable agro-commodity governance: The state of knowledge and future research directions Towards sustainable governance of freshwater sand – A resource regime approach Exploring the rights of nature in freshwater and marine ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1