不同龈下机械器械技术对根表面修饰的评价-体外研究

Q4 Dentistry Revista Romana de Stomatologie Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.37897/rjs.2023.1.8
A. Soancă, Alexandra Roman, A. Ciurea, I. Micu, Andrei Picos, Sofia Iozon (Ene)
{"title":"不同龈下机械器械技术对根表面修饰的评价-体外研究","authors":"A. Soancă, Alexandra Roman, A. Ciurea, I. Micu, Andrei Picos, Sofia Iozon (Ene)","doi":"10.37897/rjs.2023.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives. The aim of this in vitro study was to observe through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the surface morphology of root samples treated with different mechanical instrumentation methods and the additional application of a nano-colloidal silver-based antiseptic solution. Material and methods. Root samples were prepared from extracted molars and divided in four groups: group 1 of samples was instrumented with Gracey curette (7/8), group 2 of samples was instrumented with ultrasonic tip 1S, group 3 of samples was instrumented with ultrasonic tips 1S plus H4R/L, group 4 of samples was treated with ultrasonic tips 1S plus H4R/L and application of the silver-based antiseptic solution. All samples were then subjected to SEM examination. Outcomes. Group 1 of samples presented a smoother surface compared to the samples in the other groups. Group 2, 3 and 4 displayed superficial grooves parallel to the direction of action of the ultrasonic tip. In group 3 and 4, root planning with tip H4R/L did not ameliorate the smoothness of the surface. The smear layer was present, regardless the instrumentation method. In group 4, the additional application of the antiseptic solution did not influence the surface morphology or the amount of smear layer. Conclusions. Gracey curettes created a smoother radicular surface compared to ultrasonic tips. Smear layer was obvious on the radicular surfaces, no matter the instrumentation method. The application of the silver-based antiseptic solution had no additional impact on surface morphology.","PeriodicalId":33514,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romana de Stomatologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The evaluation of root surface modifications after different subgingival mechanical instrumentation techniques – an in vitro study\",\"authors\":\"A. Soancă, Alexandra Roman, A. Ciurea, I. Micu, Andrei Picos, Sofia Iozon (Ene)\",\"doi\":\"10.37897/rjs.2023.1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives. The aim of this in vitro study was to observe through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the surface morphology of root samples treated with different mechanical instrumentation methods and the additional application of a nano-colloidal silver-based antiseptic solution. Material and methods. Root samples were prepared from extracted molars and divided in four groups: group 1 of samples was instrumented with Gracey curette (7/8), group 2 of samples was instrumented with ultrasonic tip 1S, group 3 of samples was instrumented with ultrasonic tips 1S plus H4R/L, group 4 of samples was treated with ultrasonic tips 1S plus H4R/L and application of the silver-based antiseptic solution. All samples were then subjected to SEM examination. Outcomes. Group 1 of samples presented a smoother surface compared to the samples in the other groups. Group 2, 3 and 4 displayed superficial grooves parallel to the direction of action of the ultrasonic tip. In group 3 and 4, root planning with tip H4R/L did not ameliorate the smoothness of the surface. The smear layer was present, regardless the instrumentation method. In group 4, the additional application of the antiseptic solution did not influence the surface morphology or the amount of smear layer. Conclusions. Gracey curettes created a smoother radicular surface compared to ultrasonic tips. Smear layer was obvious on the radicular surfaces, no matter the instrumentation method. The application of the silver-based antiseptic solution had no additional impact on surface morphology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Romana de Stomatologie\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Romana de Stomatologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjs.2023.1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romana de Stomatologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjs.2023.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。本体外研究的目的是通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察用不同机械仪器方法处理的根样品的表面形态以及纳米胶体银基防腐溶液的额外应用。材料和方法。从提取的臼齿中制备牙根样本,并将其分为四组:第一组样本用Gracey刮匙(7/8)进行器械治疗,第二组样本用超声波尖端1S进行器械治疗;第三组样本用超声尖端1S加H4R/L进行器械治疗。然后对所有样品进行SEM检查。结果。与其他组中的样品相比,第1组样品呈现出更光滑的表面。第2组、第3组和第4组显示平行于超声尖端作用方向的浅槽。在第3组和第4组中,用H4R/L尖端进行根部规划并没有改善表面的光滑度。无论采用何种仪器方法,均存在涂抹层。在第4组中,额外施用防腐溶液不会影响表面形态或涂抹层的数量。结论。与超声波尖端相比,优雅的刮匙创造了更光滑的神经根表面。无论采用何种方法,根表面均有明显的Smear层。银基防腐溶液的应用对表面形态没有额外的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The evaluation of root surface modifications after different subgingival mechanical instrumentation techniques – an in vitro study
Objectives. The aim of this in vitro study was to observe through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) the surface morphology of root samples treated with different mechanical instrumentation methods and the additional application of a nano-colloidal silver-based antiseptic solution. Material and methods. Root samples were prepared from extracted molars and divided in four groups: group 1 of samples was instrumented with Gracey curette (7/8), group 2 of samples was instrumented with ultrasonic tip 1S, group 3 of samples was instrumented with ultrasonic tips 1S plus H4R/L, group 4 of samples was treated with ultrasonic tips 1S plus H4R/L and application of the silver-based antiseptic solution. All samples were then subjected to SEM examination. Outcomes. Group 1 of samples presented a smoother surface compared to the samples in the other groups. Group 2, 3 and 4 displayed superficial grooves parallel to the direction of action of the ultrasonic tip. In group 3 and 4, root planning with tip H4R/L did not ameliorate the smoothness of the surface. The smear layer was present, regardless the instrumentation method. In group 4, the additional application of the antiseptic solution did not influence the surface morphology or the amount of smear layer. Conclusions. Gracey curettes created a smoother radicular surface compared to ultrasonic tips. Smear layer was obvious on the radicular surfaces, no matter the instrumentation method. The application of the silver-based antiseptic solution had no additional impact on surface morphology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
SEM and EDS comparative studies about the homogeneity of some cements used for luting of posts Ultrastructural studies on implants failure with immediate or late loading The causes of adhesive direct dental restorations failures A systematic review of sinus floor augmentation complications. Does graft type influence the complications rate? The RT-PCR additional value in detecting periodontal pathogens in periodontitis patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1