{"title":"通过回顾来展望未来:布兰代斯在惠特尼诉加州案中的一致意见和通信法学术的未来","authors":"A. Sanders","doi":"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the decade following World War I, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a number of influential cases involving outspoken speakers, whose ideas were often less than popular. Against this backdrop, Justice Louis Brandeis introduced civic courage – the notion that public discussion of important issues is a political duty even when those ideas run counter to the status quo. Using his approach, this essay calls upon our most-established communication law scholars, asserting they are duty-bound to push our field and our scholarship forward. It outlines four areas in which we must undertake profound change to ensure the intellectual vibrancy of our scholarship and meaningfully commit to diversity and inclusion. By its very nature, ours must be a field that welcomes a robust exchange of ideas and viewpoints. It is past time to abandon the staid norms of First Amendment exceptionalism and traditional thinking about communication law.","PeriodicalId":42622,"journal":{"name":"Communication Law and Policy","volume":"25 1","pages":"429 - 446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Looking Forward by Looking Backward: Brandeis’ Concurrence in Whitney v. California and the Future of Communication Law Scholarship\",\"authors\":\"A. Sanders\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the decade following World War I, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a number of influential cases involving outspoken speakers, whose ideas were often less than popular. Against this backdrop, Justice Louis Brandeis introduced civic courage – the notion that public discussion of important issues is a political duty even when those ideas run counter to the status quo. Using his approach, this essay calls upon our most-established communication law scholars, asserting they are duty-bound to push our field and our scholarship forward. It outlines four areas in which we must undertake profound change to ensure the intellectual vibrancy of our scholarship and meaningfully commit to diversity and inclusion. By its very nature, ours must be a field that welcomes a robust exchange of ideas and viewpoints. It is past time to abandon the staid norms of First Amendment exceptionalism and traditional thinking about communication law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42622,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Law and Policy\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"429 - 446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Law and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Law and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10811680.2020.1805944","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
Looking Forward by Looking Backward: Brandeis’ Concurrence in Whitney v. California and the Future of Communication Law Scholarship
In the decade following World War I, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a number of influential cases involving outspoken speakers, whose ideas were often less than popular. Against this backdrop, Justice Louis Brandeis introduced civic courage – the notion that public discussion of important issues is a political duty even when those ideas run counter to the status quo. Using his approach, this essay calls upon our most-established communication law scholars, asserting they are duty-bound to push our field and our scholarship forward. It outlines four areas in which we must undertake profound change to ensure the intellectual vibrancy of our scholarship and meaningfully commit to diversity and inclusion. By its very nature, ours must be a field that welcomes a robust exchange of ideas and viewpoints. It is past time to abandon the staid norms of First Amendment exceptionalism and traditional thinking about communication law.
期刊介绍:
The societal, cultural, economic and political dimensions of communication, including the freedoms of speech and press, are undergoing dramatic global changes. The convergence of the mass media, telecommunications, and computers has raised important questions reflected in analyses of modern communication law, policy, and regulation. Serving as a forum for discussions of these continuing and emerging questions, Communication Law and Policy considers traditional and contemporary problems of freedom of expression and dissemination, including theoretical, conceptual and methodological issues inherent in the special conditions presented by new media and information technologies.